Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur
Dilshyad Khan S/O Abdul Shakur vs State Of Rajasthan (2026:Rj-Jp:6542) on 11 February, 2026
[2026:RJ-JP:6542]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9708/2023
1. Dilshyad Khan S/o Abdul Shakur, Aged About 21 Years, R/
o 34/35 Sector 35, Pratap Nagar, Sanganer Jaipur
2. Vijay Saini S/o Sohan Lal Saini, Aged About 24 Years, R/o
10, Ramnagar-A, Toll Tax, Pratap Nagar, Sanganer, Jaipur
3. Krishna Kumar Sharma S/o Ram Ray Sharma, Aged About
24 Years, R/o S-70 Riico Colony, Sanganer Jaipur
4. Dheeraj Saini S/o Vijay Kumar Saini, Aged About 21
Years, R/o Udb Rakshak, Jagatpura Jaipur
5. Kshitiz Srivastava S/o Manish Srivastava, Aged About 23
Years, R/o 16/34 Vinay Nagar, Bichla, Ajmer
6. Ankit Vaishnav S/o Rajendra Prasad Vaishnav, Aged About
22 Years, R/o Pratap Apartment, Pratap Nagar, Sector 29,
Jaipur
7. Avinash Jaiman S/o Dinesh Kumar Sharma, Aged About
21 Years, R/o E-34 Saraswati Nagar, Jaipur
8. Arun Kumar S/o Pappu Ram, Aged About 22 Years, R/o
44, Mukhya Abadi, Gothari Kishangarh Bans, Alwar
9. Aman Kumar Vashistha S/o Shiv Kumar Sharma, R/o Vyas
Pada, Masalpur, Karauli
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Additional Chief
Secretary, Medical Health And Family Welfare
Department, Secretariat, Jaipur
2. State Health And Family Welfare Institution, Jhalana
Doongri Jaipur Through Its Director
3. Rajasthan Paramedical Council, Jaipur C-7, Sultan House,
2 And 3 Floor, Above Canara Bank, Sawai Jai Singh
Highway Bani Park, Jaipur Through Its Registrar
4. Mahatma Gandhi University Of Medical Sciences And
Technology, Sitapura Jaipur Through Its Registrar
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashwinee Kumar Jaiman
Mr. Keshav Parashar
(Uploaded on 17/02/2026 at 09:49:35 AM)
(Downloaded on 18/02/2026 at 03:57:06 PM)
[2026:RJ-JP:6542] (2 of 3) [CW-9708/2023]
Mr. Moin Khan
Mr. Ashish Kabra
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bharat Saini
Mr. Vivek Guwalani for
Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order
11/02/2026
1. Learned counsel for the parties are in agreement that
the issue involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by
judgment dated 08.09.2025 passed by Coordinate Bench of this
Court in the batch of writ petitions led by S.B. Civil Writ Petition
No. 17418/2016 (Pinki Yadav & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan
& Ors.). Petitioner submits that only change is in the year of
recruitment.
2. In the aforesaid order dated 08.09.2025 following
directions were given:
(i) It is declared that the Rajasthan Para Medical Council
had no authority to deny registration to the petitioners
and the denial was arbitrary and illegal.
(ii) The respondents are directed to consider the
candidature of the petitioners for appointment on the
posts of Lab Technician/Assistant Radiographer pursuant
to advertisement dated 10.10.2016, provided they are
otherwise eligible and have secured suitable place in
merit, while doing so no objection shall be raised on the
ground that their registration with RPMC was not granted
prior to last date of submission of application form.
(iii) It is, however, clarified that the above direction shall
apply only to those petitioners, who had duly submitted
their application for registration with RPMC prior to last
date prescribed for submitting application form under the
advertisement dated 10.10.2016.
(iv) Petitioners shall be accorded appointment in
accordance with their merit position in the selection
process. Upon appointment of the eligible and entitled
petitioners, they shall be granted notional seniority and
notional pay fixation from the date persons lower in merit(Uploaded on 17/02/2026 at 09:49:35 AM)
(Downloaded on 18/02/2026 at 03:57:06 PM)
[2026:RJ-JP:6542] (3 of 3) [CW-9708/2023]to them were appointed. However, they shall not be
entitled to claim back wages or arrears of salary for the
period prior to their actual joining. Necessary compliance
shall be made accordingly by the Respondents within a
period of two months from the date of receipt of a
certified copy of this order.
3. In view of the consensus arrived at between the
parties, the instant writ petition is disposed of in the same terms
and with the same directions as given in the case of Pinki Yadav
(supra).
4. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(ANAND SHARMA),J
NEERU /74
(Uploaded on 17/02/2026 at 09:49:35 AM)
(Downloaded on 18/02/2026 at 03:57:06 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
