Advertisement
Advertisement

― Advertisement ―

The Challenge of judicial vacancies: Growing Justice System Crisis

WHAT IS THE SUPREME COURT RULING ABOUT? According to the Supreme Court decision, in the lack of a rule requiring so, there is no...

Who is Rich

HomeDeva Rajak vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 11 March, 2026

Deva Rajak vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 11 March, 2026

ADVERTISEMENT

21. It is highlighted that unless the possession
was coupled with requisite mental element, i.e.
conscious possession and not mere custody
without awareness of the nature of such
possession, Section 20 is not attracted.

SPONSORED

22. The expression ‘possession’ is a
polymorphous term which assumes different
colours in different contexts. It may carry
different meanings in contextually different
backgrounds. It is impossible, as was observed
in Superintendent & Remembrancer of Legal
Affairs, West Bengal v. Anil Kumar Bhunja and
Ors. (AIR 1980 SC 52), to work out a
completely logical and precise definition of
“possession” uniformally applicable to all
situations in the context of all statutes.



Source link