AIRRNEWS

Become a member

Get the best offers and updates relating to Liberty Case News.

― Advertisement ―

Golden Traders And Others vs The on 16 February, 2026

Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. PASUPULETI VENKATA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX ...
HomeHigh CourtAndhra Pradesh High Court - AmravatiChukka Pavan Kumar Reddy vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 21...

Chukka Pavan Kumar Reddy vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 21 July, 2025

The Criminal Petition has been filed under Section 482 of the

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNSS’) by

the petitioner/Accused No.1 for granting of pre-arrest bail in connection

with Crime No.45 of 2025 on the file of Steelplant Police Station,

Visakhapatnam Commissionerate, registered for the alleged offences

punishable under Sections 318 (4), 336 (3), 340 (2) read with 3 (5) of the

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNS’).

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 05.06.2025 at 17.00 hours

the complainant reported that his father was working as a foreman in the

BF-2 Department. He had completed B.Sc. and was searching for jobs

at that time. He approached Chukka Pavan Reddy, who is a friend of

real estate consultant Shiva. The said accused person offered a job in

the Revenue Department to the complainant. Based on that, the

complainant gave an amount of Rs.8,00,000/- through various

transactions in the presence of Chukka Purna, who is the Accused No.2

in the present case and the wife of Chukka Pavan Reddy,

petitioner/Accused No.1. Later, the accused neither provided the job and

nor returned the money to the complainant. Thereafter, the accused

Dr. YLR, J

Dated 21.07.2025

gave a cheque bearing number 40990388891. The complainant

deposited the cheque in the bank, but it was returned due to insufficient

balance in the said account. Later, he came to know that the accused

persons, Accused Nos.1 and 2, had cheated the complainant. Basing on

the said report of the complainant, a case was registered against the

petitioner/Accused No.1.



Source link