Become a member

Get the best offers and updates relating to Liberty Case News.

― Advertisement ―

A Constitutional Analysis Through the Doctrine of Pith and Substance – Law School Policy Review

Sanskriti Verma Abstract: This post examines how the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act, 2025 fails constitutional scrutiny under the Doctrine of Pith...
HomeHigh CourtRajasthan High CourtChintu Makwana vs State Of Rajasthan on 19 February, 2026

Chintu Makwana vs State Of Rajasthan on 19 February, 2026


Order

Conclusion of Arguments &
Reserved on : 16/02/2026
Pronounced on : 19/02/2026

1. This application for bail has been filed by the petitioner under

Section 483 of BNSS (old Section 439 of Cr.P.C.) in connection

with FIR No. 399/2023 dated 10.12.2023, Police Station Sadar

Banswara, District Banswara, for the offences under Section 302

IPC. After filing challan, offences under Sections 341, 143,147,

148, 149, 365, 201, 114 & 120-B IPC, have been added.

2. Learned counsel of the petitioner submitted that the main

accused in the present crime is Devendra Makwana. He submitted

that there were in all 31 witnesses, out of which only 03 witnesses

have been examined so far. While referring to the FIR, it was

submitted that the complainant has not made any direct allegation

against the petitioner, rather it is stated that the father of the

(Uploaded on 19/02/2026 at 04:49:26 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:8894] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-14301/2025]

complainant, who is deceased, told him about the threat received

from co-accused Devendra and the present petitioner. There is no

eye-witness to the incident and the petitioner has been implicated

based on circumstantial evidence.



Source link