Become a member

Get the best offers and updates relating to Liberty Case News.

― Advertisement ―

spot_img

At the 5th SCL India's Biennial International Conference, 2025.

Our team attended the 5th SCL India's Biennial International Conference, 2025. Right from the Inaugral ceremony, the discourses truly marked brainstorming sessions from the...
HomeHigh CourtRajasthan High Court - JodhpurC.T.O., Ward-B, Udaipur vs M/S Soni Marketing, Udaipur ... on 7 August,...

C.T.O., Ward-B, Udaipur vs M/S Soni Marketing, Udaipur … on 7 August, 2025


Order

07/08/2025

1. The instant civil revision petition under Section 84 of the

Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003 has been preferred on behalf

of the Commercial Taxes Department being aggrieved of the

judgment and order dated 06.06.2013 passed by the Rajasthan

Tax Board, Ajmer in Appeal No.2231/2011/Udaipur, whereby the

appeal preferred by the Revenue was dismissed and the order

dated 27.06.2011 passed by the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals),

Commercial Taxes Department, Udaipur in Appeal No.137/VAT/10-

11 was affirmed.

2. Briefly stated, facts of the case are that the Assessing

Authority while assessing the tax of the respondent firm for the

Assessment Year 2007-08 found that the assessee firm had

purchased branded potato chips, namely, Uncle Chips, Lays etc.,

from the M/s Pepsico India Holding Pvt. Ltd. and sold the same by

[2025:RJ-JD:35678] (2 of 9) [CR-222/2013]

collecting tax at the rate of 4%, whereas the branded chips are

taxable at the rate of 12.5%, therefore, differential tax of

Rs.5,41,120/-, penalty under Section 61 of the RVAT Act

amounting to Rs.10,82,240/- (double of the alleged evaded tax

amount) and interest of Rs.1,62,336/- was imposed vide order

dated 31.03.2010 and since the assessee had not submitted form

VAT-10 and VAT-10A at the relevant time, therefore, penalty

amounting to Rs.36,910/- was also imposed vide the same order.



Source link