Become a member

Get the best offers and updates relating to Liberty Case News.

― Advertisement ―

HomeHigh CourtPatna High Court - OrdersBharat Kumar Sharma, vs The State Of Bihar on 17 February, 2026

Bharat Kumar Sharma, vs The State Of Bihar on 17 February, 2026


I. A. No. 4 of 2025
Patna High Court CWJC No.9935 of 2025(5) dt.17-02-2026

1. The present Interlocutory Application is filed by

one Ms. Priya Das, praying that she be impleaded as an

intervener in the present writ petition. The factual aspects of the

application, as averred by the applicant, are as follows:

The applicant describes herself as a public-spirited

individual and social worker, serving as the Patron of the Tribal

Social Welfare Trust, a registered public charitable organization

focused on the upliftment and protection of the rights of

Scheduled Tribes across India. She claims to have initiated

multiple complaints and representations regarding the

petitioner’s alleged fraudulent use of a Scheduled Tribe (ST)

caste certificate to secure employment and subsequent benefits

in the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), including his

initial appointment as Assistant Environmental Engineer in 1997

and his later role as Member Secretary in 2023. These

complaints were lodged with bodies such as the National

Commission for Scheduled Tribes (NCST), Central Vigilance

Commission (CVC), Prime Minister’s Office (PMO), and the

General Administration Department (GAD), Bihar, between

2023 and 2025, allegedly leading to the caste verification

proceedings challenged in the main writ petition. The applicant

asserts that the petitioner’s caste certificate, declaring him as
Patna High Court CWJC No.9935 of 2025(5) dt.17-02-2026

belonging to the “Lohar” caste under ST, was provisional and

invalidated by Bihar Government Circular No. 43 dated

23.03.1996, following the Supreme Court’s judgment in

Nityanand Sharma v. State of Bihar, (1996) 3 SCC 576, yet he

continued to avail benefits. She highlights her role in pursuing

these complaints, including appearances before NCST and

representations to the Ministry of Environment, Forest and

Climate Change (MoEFCC), and argues that her intervention is

necessary in public interest to safeguard ST rights from misuse.



Source link