Asis Kumar Tewari vs Unknown on 6 March, 2026

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Asis Kumar Tewari vs Unknown on 6 March, 2026

Author: Tirthankar Ghosh

Bench: Tirthankar Ghosh

06.03.2026
Serial no. 34
  [G.S.D]



                                          CRM (M) 2084 of 2025
                 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of
                 Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in
                 connection with Suti Police Station Case No. 80 of 2024 dated
                 30.01.2024 u/s 467///// of the IPC, 1860 and adding
                 Sections 7(a)///// of the PC Act.
                                             -And-

                In the matter of : Asis Kumar Tewari

                                                                                ... Petitioner(s)
                Mr. Ayan Bhattacharjee
                Mr. Jisan Iqbal Hossain
                                                             ... for the Petitioner(s)

                Mr. Zareen Nasima Khan, Jr Govt. Adv.
                Mr. Prakash Mishra
                                                             ... for the State-respondent(s)

A comprehensive report has been submitted by the

State which reflects that sanction has been granted by the

Secretary, WBBSE. Let the same be kept with the record.

Mr. Bhattacharjee, learned senior advocate, submits

that the petitioner is in custody for one year ten months.

The investigation is complete and charge-

sheet/supplementary charge-sheet has been submitted

before the jurisdictional court.

Having considered that the issue relating to grant of

sanction consumed substantial period of time, I am of the

view that the proceedings should be expedited at the trial

court.

Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer

for bail.

2

The case was initiated pursuant to the directions

passed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the

Hon’ble High Court and the investigation has already been

completed, charge-sheet/supplementary charge-sheet has

also been submitted before the jurisdictional court.

Having considered the period of detention of the

petitioner which is for one year ten months as also the fact

that the investigation having been completed, I am of the

view that the learned trial court would release the petitioner

on bail on such terms and conditions as it deems fit and

proper for ensuring further appearance of the present

petitioner during the trial only after the stage of

consideration of charges is over.

With the aforesaid observations, CRM(M) 2084 of

2025 is disposed of.

Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected
from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta.

Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied
for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all
requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)
3