Become a member

Get the best offers and updates relating to Liberty Case News.

― Advertisement ―

spot_img

JOB OPPORTUNITY UNDER SONAL MISHAL

About the FirmThe hiring organisation is seeking experienced legal professionals to manage litigation and non-litigation matters, particularly in real estate and dispute resolution....
HomeSupreme Court of IndiaAIROnline 2025 SC 789

AIROnline 2025 SC 789


Supreme Court Of India

(From : AIROnline 2024 KAR 2363)

Hon’ble Judge(s):

Vikram Nath,
Sanjay Karol,
Sandeep Mehta
, JJJ

Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act (19 of 1952) , S.11— Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (54 of 2002) , S.35— Sale of defaulter’s assets – Claims of priority by EPFO and bank – Determination of – Recovery proceedings were initiated against establishment as it had defaulted in payment of provident fund dues – A bank and appellant assignee of another bank had auctioned property of establishment under SARFAESI Act – Bank claimed priority under S. 35 of SARFAESI Act, over sales taxes and other dues payable to Government or local authority and pleaded that no recovery can be made from it till its entire dues were satisfied – Appellant offered to make part of the payment to EPFO but wanted bank to bear more liability having recovered more in auction – Bank was not joined as a party before High Court when order was passed by High Court directing appellant to transmit money to the account of EPFO – Matter was remanded to High Court to examine priority of first charge amongst EPFO and secured creditors after impleading Bank as a respondent.

(Para 9
10
11
12)

…..

Step 1

Enter your contact details.



Source link