― Advertisement ―

Important articles and Judgments on witness protection

 1) SC approves Witness Protection Scheme 2018We, accordingly, direct that:(i) This Court has given its imprimatur to the Scheme prepared by respondent No. 1...
Home______________________________________ vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 10 March, 2026

______________________________________ vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 10 March, 2026

The petitioner has filed the present petition for

seeking regular bail in FIR No. 58/2025, dated 14.03.2025,

registered at Police Station Sadar, District Bilaspur, H.P., for the

commission of an offence punishable under Section 109 read with

Section 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 and Section

25 of the Arms Act.

Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes

( 2026:HHC:6377 )

2. It has been asserted that the petitioner was falsely

implicated based on prior enmity with the injured. As per the

prosecution, the injured and his son had hired the shooters to kill

the petitioner. They shot at the petitioner, and he suffered a bullet

injury. An FIR No. 160 of 2024 was registered at Police Station

Sadar, District Bilaspur, H.P. Subsequently, the informant was

also injured in a shootout. 7-8 FIRs have been registered against

the petitioner because of the enmity and political rivalry. The

police arrested the petitioner based on the surmises. There is no

material to connect the petitioner to the commission of the crime.

Petitioner had filed a bail petition, which was dismissed by the

learned Sessions Judge. The petitioner would abide by the terms

and conditions that the Court may impose. Hence, it was prayed

that the present petition be allowed and the petitioner be released

on bail.



Source link