Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur
Raman Ahir S/O Bhawani Lal vs State Of Rajasthan on 14 July, 2026
[2026:RJ-JP:26672]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10514/2026
URN: CRLMB / 19508U / 2026
Raman Ahir S/o Bhawani Lal, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Surya
Nagar Road, Jagpura, Police Station Ranpur, District Kota City,
(Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota, District
Kota).
----Accused-Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
—-Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nitin Kumar Sharma
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA
Order
14/07/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed against the order
of the learned trial Court dated 01.07.2026 on behalf of the
accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with
FIR No. 78/2026 registered at Police Station Ranpur, District Kota
City for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 8, 15 and 18 of
NDPS Act.
2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the
accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; that
charge-sheet has already been filed; that the accused-petitioner is
in custody since long; that co-accused has already been enlarged
on bail; that recovered contraband is below commercial quantity;
that there are no criminal antecedents of similar nature
registered against the accused-petitioner and conclusion of trial
(Uploaded on 18/07/2026 at 12:48:24 PM)
(Downloaded on 20/07/2026 at 11:56:34 PM)
[2026:RJ-JP:26672] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-10514/2026]
will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by
keeping the accused-petitioner behind the bars and, therefore,
prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of
bail under Section 483 of BNSS.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes
the submissions preferred by learned counsel for the accused-
petitioner hereinabove. It is further submitted that there is one
criminal antecedent registered against the accused-petitioner
under Sections 323, 341, 354 of IPC and under Section 3(2)(va)
of SC/ST Act. Therefore, he should not be enlarged on bail.
4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances
of the case and material available on record. Keeping in view the
fact that the charge-sheet against the accused-petitioner has
already been filed; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since
29.04.2026; that recovered contraband is below commercial
quantity; that there are no criminal antecedents of similar nature
registered against the accused-petitioner; that co-accused namely
Vikram Bajya has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide
order dated 03.06.2026 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail
Application No. 7889/2026 and trial will take its own time. Hence,
this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits
of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-
petitioner on bail.
5. Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483
BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Raman
Ahir S/o Bhawani Lal is ordered to be released on bail, provided
he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with
two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial
(Uploaded on 18/07/2026 at 12:48:24 PM)
(Downloaded on 20/07/2026 at 11:56:34 PM)
[2026:RJ-JP:26672] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-10514/2026]
Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court
and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all
subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do
so.
6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve
himself in any offence(s) during currency of the bail.
7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the
learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application
against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before
the concerned Court.
8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the
instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial
of the case in any manner.
9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the
concerned trial Court and Jail Authorities through e-mail/fax, for
necessary compliance.
(SANGEETA SHARMA),J
82/KAVISH
(Uploaded on 18/07/2026 at 12:48:24 PM)
(Downloaded on 20/07/2026 at 11:56:34 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
