Dinesh Kumar vs State Of Rajasthan on 18 July, 2026

Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur

Dinesh Kumar vs State Of Rajasthan on 18 July, 2026

[2026:RJ-JP:32556]

           HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                          AT JODHPUR

     S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9445/2026
                         CNR: RJHC010663132026
                        URN: CRLMB / 20565U / 2026

Dinesh Kumar S/o Shri Shyamlal Saraswat, Aged About 41
Years, Resident Of Brahmano Ki Saredi, Police Station Asind,
District Bhilwara. (Lodged In Central Jail Bhilwara)
                                                                       ----Petitioner
                                       Versus
1.          State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
2.          Daulat Singh S/o Shri Mool Singh Bhati, Resident Of
            Bhopalganj, Bhilwara
                                                                    ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)            :     Mr. Dilkhush Ojha (Petitioner's
                                   Brother)
For Respondent(s)            :     Mr. Deepak Choudhary, AAG
                                   Mr. Urja Ram Kalbi, PP
                                   Mr. Lalit Kishor Sen, PP



                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL BENIWAL

Order

18/07/2026

SPONSORED

1. This application for bail has been filed by the petitioner under

Section 483 of BNSS (old Section 439 of Cr.P.C.). The requisite

details of the matter are tabulated herein below:

S.No.                                Particulars of the Case
     1.      FIR Number                                     508/2023
     2.      Date of lodging FIR                            22.06.2023
     3.      Concerned Police Station                       Pratap Nagar(Bhilwara)
     4.      District                                       Bhilwara
     5.      Offences alleged in the FIR                    Sections 467, ,  and
                                                             of IPC
     6.      Offences added, if any                         Section 120-B of IPC




                         (Uploaded on 18/07/2026 at 11:28:04 AM)
                        (Downloaded on 18/07/2026 at 08:37:14 PM)
 [2026:RJ-JP:32556]                       (2 of 3)                    [CRLMB-9445/2026]

2. The brother of the petitioner is present in person. He submits

that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case and

false allegations have been levelled against him. He submits that

offence alleged against the present petitioner is triable by

Magistrate. He also submits that the dispute between the parties

is purely of civil nature and parties have amicably settled their

differences. The factum of settlement being arrived between the

parties has also been noted by the trial Court. He further submits

that co-accused Raja Ram has already been enlarged on bail by

this Court in S.B. Crl. Misc. Bail Application No.8938/2026 vide

order dated 10.07.2026. The petitioner is in judicial custody since

17.06.2026 and the trial will take sufficiently long time, therefore,

he deserves to be enlarged on bail.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes this bail

application. However, he is not in a position to refute the fact that

offences alleged against the petitioner are triable by Magistrate.

4. Heard brother of the petitioner (present in person) and

learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on

record.

5. Having considered the rival submissions, facts and

circumstances of this case so also the fact that the offence alleged

against the present petitioner is triable by Magistrate; parties have

already settled their issue; co-accused Raja Ram has already been

enlarged on bail and that the prosecution has not expressed any

apprehension qua the petitioner fleeing away from justice, in case

he is enlarged on bail, in the considered opinion of this Court, no

fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner behind

(Uploaded on 18/07/2026 at 11:28:04 AM)
(Downloaded on 18/07/2026 at 08:37:14 PM)
[2026:RJ-JP:32556] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9445/2026]

the bars for an indefinite period as the trial will take sufficiently

long time. Thus, without expressing any opinion on

merits/demerits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the

bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted.

6. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 of

BNSS is allowed. It is ordered that petitioner- Dinesh Kumar

S/o Shri Shyamlal Saraswat, shall be released on bail in

connection with the aforesaid FIR; provided he executes personal

bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sound and solvent

sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial

Court for his appearance before that court on each and every date

of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of

the trial.

7. It is however, made clear that findings recorded/observations

made above are for limited purposes of adjudication of bail

application. The trial court shall not get prejudiced by the same.

(SUNIL BENIWAL),J

18/Abhishek kushwaha/664

(Uploaded on 18/07/2026 at 11:28:04 AM)
(Downloaded on 18/07/2026 at 08:37:14 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)