Uttarakhand High Court
Pankaj Sharma vs State Of Uttarakhand on 14 July, 2026
Author: Rakesh Thapliyal
Bench: Rakesh Thapliyal
Office Notes, reports, orders
SL. Dat or proceedings or directions COURT'S OR JUDGE'S ORDERS
No. e and Registrar's order with
Signatures
UKHC010120552026
CRLA/407/2026
Pankaj Sharma
--Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand --Respondent
Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the
appellant.
2. Mr. Tumul K Nainwal, learned AGA, for the State
of Uttarakhand.
3. The instant criminal appeal has been preferred by
the appellant – Pankaj Sharma S/o Lapparam,
challenging the judgment and order passed by the
learned Special Judge, (NDPS Act), Haridwar in Special
Sessions Trial No.47 of 2019, “State Vs. Pankaj Sharma”
arising out of FIR No.89 of 2018, whereby the appellant
has been convicted for the offences punishable under
Section 8/20 of the NDPS Act with the sentence of three
years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.20,000/-.
4. As per office report, the appeal is well within
time.
5. Admit.
6. Summon the trial court record.
7. It is argued by the learned counsel for the
appellant that while convicting the appellant, the Trial
Court enlarged the appellant on interim bail.
8. Let the State may file objections within two weeks
to the bail application by disclosing about the criminal
antecedents of the appellant.
9. Put up this matter on 07.08.2026.
10. Till then, the appellant shall remain on interim
bail.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.)
14.07.2026
Nitesh/
