The Secretary To Government vs Ashok George on 16 July, 2026

    0
    12
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Dr. A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar, J.

    SPONSORED

    As the issue involved in all these appeals is the same, they are

    taken up together for consideration and disposed by this common

    judgment.

    2. W.A.No.665 of 2017 impugns the judgment dated

    14.12.2016 of a learned Single Judge in W.P.(C).No.25006 of 2015.

    The petitioners in the said writ petition were owners of property in

    Kozhikode district in which they were carrying on granite operations. By

    virtue of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Thresiamma Jacob v.

    Geologist – [2013 (3) KLT 275 (SC)] persons in ownership of land in

    the Malabar region of Kerala State, had to be treated as owners of the

    land as well as the sub-soil, and consequently, unless there was an

    enactment vesting the ownership of the sub-soil/mineral wealth in the

    State of Kerala, there could be no demand of royalty from the said

    landowners when they exploited the mineral wealth from their own

    lands. It was therefore their case in the writ petition that the provisions

    of Rule 2 to 9, 11, 12, 20 and 49 of the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession
    CNR : KLHC010459232017

    W.A.No.665/2017, 3218/25, 440/26,
    587/26, 590/26 & 1263/26 :: 14 ::



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here