The right to appeal is an important component of the criminal justice system. A judgment delivered by a criminal court may involve errors in the appreciation of evidence, interpretation of law, application of procedural rules, or determination of sentence. The appellate process provides an opportunity for a superior court to examine such errors and, where necessary, correct the decision of the subordinate court.
The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), which replaced the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC), contains a comprehensive framework governing criminal appeals. The provisions relating to appeals are primarily contained in Sections 413 to 435 of the BNSS.
However, an appeal is not an inherent or automatic right. It is a statutory remedy and can be exercised only when the law expressly provides for it. The BNSS specifies the judgments and orders against which appeals may be filed, the persons entitled to appeal, the courts having appellate jurisdiction, the procedure for hearing appeals, and the powers available to appellate courts.
Meaning of Appeal
The term “appeal” has not been expressly defined under the BNSS. An appeal refers to a judicial proceeding through which a judgment, conviction, acquittal, sentence, or certain specified orders of a subordinate court are examined by a superior court.
An appeal is a continuation of the original proceedings. The appellate court may examine questions of law as well as questions of fact, depending upon the nature and scope of the appeal permitted by the statute.
The object of appellate jurisdiction is to provide a mechanism for correcting judicial errors and preventing miscarriage of justice. An appellate court may reconsider the evidence, examine the legality of the proceedings, determine whether the findings recorded by the trial court are sustainable, and interfere with the sentence where circumstances justify such intervention.
At the same time, the right of appeal is entirely statutory. No person can claim a right to appeal unless such right has been conferred by the BNSS or any other law in force.
General Rule: No Appeal Unless Provided by Law
Section 413 of the BNSS lays down the fundamental principle governing criminal appeals. No appeal can be filed against any judgment or order of a criminal court unless the BNSS or some other law expressly provides for such an appeal.
The provision reinforces the principle that an appeal is a creature of statute. However, the proviso to Section 413 recognises an important right of the victim. A victim has the right to prefer an appeal against an order:
- acquitting the accused;
- convicting the accused for a lesser offence; or
- imposing inadequate compensation.
Such an appeal lies to the court before which an appeal ordinarily lies against the order of conviction passed by the concerned court.
The provision strengthens the position of victims within the criminal justice system by giving them an independent statutory right to challenge certain adverse outcomes of criminal proceedings.
Appeals from Orders Requiring Security or Refusing Surety
Section 414 of the BNSS provides a right of appeal against certain orders concerning security for keeping peace or maintaining good behaviour.
A person ordered to give security for keeping the peace or for good behaviour may appeal against such order to the Court of Session.
Similarly, a person aggrieved by an order refusing to accept or rejecting a surety may prefer an appeal before the Court of Session.
However, the provision does not apply where proceedings are laid before a Sessions Judge in accordance with the specific procedure provided under the BNSS.
Appeals from Convictions
Section 415 of the BNSS deals with appeals against convictions and determines the appropriate appellate forum according to the court passing the conviction.
Appeal to the Supreme Court
A person convicted by the High Court in the exercise of its extraordinary original criminal jurisdiction may appeal to the Supreme Court.
Appeal to the High Court
A person may appeal to the High Court where:
- he has been convicted on a trial held by a Sessions Judge or Additional Sessions Judge; or
- any other court has sentenced him to imprisonment for more than seven years.
Where several persons are convicted at the same trial, all persons convicted at that trial may appeal to the High Court if any one of them has been sentenced to imprisonment for more than seven years.
Appeal to the Court of Session
An appeal lies to the Court of Session where a person is:
- convicted on a trial held by a Magistrate of the first class or second class;
- sentenced under Section 364 of the BNSS; or
- subjected to an order or sentence against which an appeal is permitted under Section 401 of the BNSS.
Thus, Section 415 distributes appellate jurisdiction between the Court of Session, High Court, and Supreme Court according to the nature of the trial court and the sentence imposed.
No Appeal in Certain Cases Where Accused Pleads Guilty
Section 416 restricts the right of appeal where an accused person has pleaded guilty and has been convicted on the basis of such plea.
Where the conviction is recorded by the High Court upon a plea of guilty, no appeal is permitted. Where the conviction is recorded by a Court of Session or by a Magistrate upon a plea of guilty, an appeal can be filed only regarding the extent or legality of the sentence.
The provision is based on the principle that a person who voluntarily admits guilt ordinarily cannot subsequently challenge the conviction itself.
However, questions concerning the legality or extent of the sentence may still remain open to appellate scrutiny.
No Appeal in Petty Cases
Section 417 of the BNSS excludes appeals in certain petty cases. The object of this provision is to prevent the appellate courts from being burdened with appeals involving comparatively minor punishments.
- High Court: Imprisonment up to 3 months, fine up to ₹1,000, or both.
- Court of Session: Imprisonment up to 3 months, fine up to ₹200, or both.
- First Class Magistrate: Fine up to ₹100.
- Summary Trial by Magistrate under Section 283: Fine up to ₹200.
However, an appeal is allowed if any additional punishment is imposed along with the above sentence.
An appeal does not become maintainable merely because the convicted person is ordered to furnish security, imprisonment is imposed in default of payment of fine, or multiple fines are imposed whose total does not exceed the prescribed limit.
Appeal by the State Government Against Inadequate Sentence
Section 418 empowers the State Government to direct the Public Prosecutor to file an appeal against a sentence on the ground that it is inadequate.
Where the conviction has resulted from an investigation conducted by an agency empowered under a Central law, the Central Government may direct the Public Prosecutor to present such an appeal.
The appeal lies:
- to the Court of Session where the sentence was imposed by a Magistrate; and
- to the High Court where the sentence was imposed by any other court.
The appellate court cannot enhance the sentence without first giving the accused a reasonable opportunity to show cause against such enhancement.
While showing cause, the accused may also plead for acquittal or reduction of the sentence.
This safeguard ensures compliance with the principles of natural justice before the punishment imposed upon an accused is increased.
Appeal in Case of Acquittal
Section 419 of the BNSS governs appeals against orders of acquittal. The District Magistrate can direct the Public Prosecutor to appeal to the Court of Session against an acquittal passed by a Magistrate in a cognizable and non-bailable offence.
Appeal Against Conviction by High Court in Certain Cases
Section 420 provides for an appeal to the Supreme Court where the High Court, on appeal, reverses an order of acquittal and convicts the accused and sentences him to death, imprisonment for life, or imprisonment for ten years or more.
The provision creates a statutory right of appeal to the Supreme Court in serious cases where an acquittal has been reversed by the High Court.
Special Right of Appeal in Certain Cases
Section 421 provides a special right of appeal where more than one person is convicted in a single trial.
Where an appealable judgment or order has been passed in respect of any one of the persons convicted at the trial, all or any of the persons convicted at the same trial have a right of appeal.
The provision avoids inconsistent appellate remedies among persons convicted in the same criminal proceeding.
Procedure for Filing an Appeal
The BNSS prescribes procedural requirements governing the presentation and consideration of criminal appeals.
Petition of Appeal (Section 423)
Every appeal must ordinarily be made in the form of a petition in writing. The petition must be presented by the appellant or his advocate and must be accompanied by a copy of the judgment or order appealed against, unless the appellate court directs otherwise.
The petition should clearly state the grounds on which the judgment, conviction, sentence, or order is challenged.
Appeal by a Person in Jail (Section 424)
A person who is in jail may submit his petition of appeal and accompanying documents to the officer in charge of the jail. The jail authorities are required to forward the appeal to the appropriate appellate court.
This provision ensures that incarceration does not prevent a convicted person from exercising the statutory right of appeal.
Summary Dismissal of Appeal (Section 425)
The Appellate Court may dismiss an appeal at the initial stage if, after examining the appeal petition and judgment, it finds no sufficient ground to interfere.
However:
- The appellant must generally be given a reasonable opportunity of being heard before dismissal.
- In appeals filed through jail authorities, hearing may be dispensed with if the appeal is frivolous or producing the accused before the Court would cause disproportionate inconvenience.
- A jail appeal cannot be summarily dismissed until the time limit for filing an appeal has expired.
- The Appellate Court may call for the case record before dismissing the appeal.
- If the Court of Session or Chief Judicial Magistrate summarily dismisses the appeal, it must record reasons.
- If a jail appeal was dismissed without considering another properly filed appeal by the same appellant, the Court may hear and decide that appeal in the interests of justice.
Procedure Where Appeal Is Not Dismissed Summarily (Section 426)
Where the appellate court does not dismiss the appeal summarily, it must issue notice of the time and place at which the appeal will be heard.
Notice must be given to the appellant or his advocate and to the appropriate government authority or complainant, depending upon the nature of the appeal.
The appellate court may call for the record of the case from the subordinate court.
After receiving the record and hearing the parties, the appellate court proceeds to decide the appeal in accordance with the law.
The requirement of notice and hearing ensures that the parties affected by the appellate proceedings receive an adequate opportunity to present their arguments.
Powers of the Appellate Court
The powers of appellate courts are primarily contained in Section 427 of the BNSS. The nature of the powers depends upon the type of appeal before the court.
Powers in an Appeal Against Acquittal
In an appeal against an order of acquittal, the appellate court may:
- reverse the order of acquittal;
- direct further inquiry;
- order the accused to be retried or committed for trial;
- find the accused guilty and pass sentence according to law.
The power to reverse an acquittal is significant because the appellate court may reassess the evidence and arrive at a conclusion different from that reached by the trial court.
However, appellate courts ordinarily exercise caution while interfering with acquittals because the presumption of innocence is strengthened by an acquittal.
Powers in an Appeal Against Conviction
In an appeal against conviction, the appellate court may:
- reverse the finding and sentence and acquit or discharge the accused;
- order the accused to be retried by a competent court;
- alter the finding while maintaining the sentence;
- alter the nature or extent of the sentence;
- reduce the sentence; or
- with or without altering the finding, alter the nature or extent of the sentence as permitted by law.
The appellate court cannot enhance the sentence in an appeal filed by the accused unless the accused has been given an opportunity to show cause against such enhancement.
The appellate court also cannot impose a punishment greater than the punishment that the trial court was legally competent to impose.
Powers in an Appeal for Enhancement of Sentence
In an appeal seeking enhancement of sentence, the appellate court may:
- reverse the finding and sentence and acquit or discharge the accused;
- order a retrial;
- alter the finding while maintaining the sentence; or
- alter the nature or extent of the sentence so as to enhance or reduce it.
Before enhancing the sentence, the accused must be given a reasonable opportunity of hearing.
Powers in Appeals from Other Orders
In appeals arising from orders other than convictions or acquittals, the appellate court may alter or reverse the order appealed against.
Consequential and Incidental Orders
The appellate court may pass any amendment or consequential or incidental order that is just and proper.
This broad power enables the appellate court to mould the relief according to the requirements of justice and the circumstances of the case.
Power to Order Further Inquiry or Retrial
An appellate court may order further inquiry or retrial where defects in the original proceedings have resulted in failure of justice.
A retrial is not ordered merely because some procedural irregularity has occurred. The court must consider whether the defect has materially affected the fairness of the trial or the correctness of the judgment.
The power to direct retrial must therefore be exercised cautiously because repeated criminal proceedings may cause prejudice to both the accused and the victim.
Power to Take Additional Evidence
Section 432 of the BNSS empowers the appellate court to take additional evidence or direct such evidence to be taken where it considers additional evidence necessary.
The appellate court must record reasons for taking additional evidence. The evidence may be taken directly by the appellate court or by a subordinate court as directed. The accused or his advocate has the right to be present when additional evidence is recorded.
The power to take additional evidence is intended to advance justice and correct genuine deficiencies in the evidentiary record. It should not ordinarily be used to allow a party to fill gaps in its case that could have been addressed during the trial.
Suspension of Sentence Pending Appeal and Release on Bail
Section 430 of the BNSS empowers the appellate court to suspend the execution of a sentence pending the disposal of an appeal.
The appellate court may release the convicted person on bail or on his own bond after recording reasons in writing.
Where a person has been convicted of an offence punishable with death, imprisonment for life, or imprisonment for a term of ten years or more, the court must provide an opportunity to the Public Prosecutor to show cause in writing against release before granting bail.
The provision also recognises the right of the Public Prosecutor to seek cancellation of bail granted to the convicted person.
The suspension of sentence is particularly important because criminal appeals may take considerable time to be finally decided.
Arrest of Accused in Appeal Against Acquittal (Section 431)
When an appeal is presented against an order of acquittal, the High Court may issue a warrant directing that the accused be arrested and brought before it or any subordinate court.
The court before which the accused is produced may commit him to prison pending disposal of the appeal or release him on bail.
This power ensures the availability of the accused during proceedings arising from an appeal against acquittal.
Right of Appellant to Be Heard
The right of hearing forms an essential part of appellate procedure. Where an appeal is admitted for regular hearing, the appellant or his advocate must be given an opportunity to present arguments.
The prosecution, complainant, victim, or other interested party may also be heard according to the nature of the appeal.
The appellate court must examine the record, consider the grounds of challenge, evaluate the relevant evidence and legal issues, and deliver a reasoned judgment.
Abatement of Appeals
Section 435 of the BNSS deals with the abatement of criminal appeals. Generally, an appeal against acquittal or an appeal seeking enhancement of sentence finally abates on the death of the accused.
Other appeals ordinarily abate on the death of the appellant, except an appeal from a sentence of fine.
However, where an appeal is against a conviction and sentence of death or imprisonment, a near relative of the deceased appellant may apply for leave to continue the appeal. Such application must be made within the prescribed period.
If leave is granted, the appeal does not abate. The provision recognises that a criminal conviction may have consequences for the reputation and legal interests of the deceased person’s family even after his death.
Finality of Appellate Judgments and Orders (Section 434)
Judgments and orders passed by appellate courts are final subject to the provisions relating to further appeals, reference, and revision.
The appellate court must pronounce its judgment in accordance with the procedural requirements prescribed under the BNSS.
A copy of the appellate judgment or order is transmitted to the court whose decision was challenged so that the necessary consequential action may be taken.
Difference Between Appeal and Revision
An appeal is a statutory right available where expressly provided by law. The appellate court generally possesses broader powers to reconsider questions of fact and law and to reassess evidence.
Revision, on the other hand, is a supervisory jurisdiction exercised by the High Court or Sessions Court to examine the correctness, legality, propriety, or regularity of proceedings before subordinate criminal courts.
The revisional jurisdiction is generally narrower than appellate jurisdiction and cannot ordinarily be invoked as a substitute for an appeal where the person had a right of appeal but failed to exercise it.
Importance of Appeals in Criminal Justice Administration
The appellate mechanism performs several important functions within the criminal justice system. It provides a safeguard against wrongful convictions and unjustified acquittals. It allows superior courts to correct errors in the appreciation of evidence and interpretation of criminal law. It promotes consistency in judicial decision-making and facilitates the authoritative interpretation of statutory provisions.
The appellate process also ensures scrutiny of sentences. Punishment must remain proportionate to the gravity of the offence, the circumstances of the offender, and the applicable sentencing principles.
The rights given to victims to challenge acquittals, convictions for lesser offences, and inadequate compensation further demonstrate the movement of criminal procedure towards greater participation of victims in the justice delivery process.
At the same time, procedural restrictions on appeals in petty cases, convictions based on guilty pleas, and appeals against acquittals seek to maintain a balance between the right to judicial review and the need for finality of criminal proceedings.
Conclusion
Appeals under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 constitute an essential mechanism for correcting errors and protecting the fairness of criminal proceedings. Sections 413 to 435 of the BNSS establish a detailed framework governing appeals against convictions, acquittals, inadequate sentences, and certain specified orders.
The BNSS determines who may file an appeal, identifies the appropriate appellate forum, prescribes the procedure for presentation and hearing of appeals, and confers extensive powers upon appellate courts.
Depending upon the nature of the appeal, an appellate court may reverse a conviction or acquittal, order further inquiry or retrial, alter findings, modify sentences, take additional evidence, suspend the execution of sentences, grant bail, and pass consequential orders necessary to secure the ends of justice.
However, the right of appeal remains a statutory right and must be exercised strictly within the framework established by law.
The appellate system ultimately serves a broader purpose than merely providing another stage of litigation. It strengthens judicial accountability, promotes consistency in criminal adjudication, protects the rights of accused persons and victims, and helps ensure that criminal proceedings result in decisions that are lawful, fair, and just.
Important Link
Law Library: Notes and Study Material for LLB, LLM, Judiciary, and Entrance Exams
