1. The appeal is directed against an order dated April 7, 2026, passed in
WPA 3311 of 2026.
2. By the order impugned, the learned Single Judge held that clause D of
the terms and conditions of the e-Auction notice dated December 31, 2025
had been incorporated by the tendering authority arbitrarily and with
malafide intention, only to debar the writ petitioner from participating in the
said tender process. Accordingly, the writ petition was allowed and the e-
Auction process initiated by the Birbhum Zilla Parishad by the notice dated
December 31, 2025, bearing No. WBZP-BHM-A-06-2025-26, was set aside
and quashed.
3. The work order issued to the appellant, as also the order of rejection
of the bid of the respondent No. 7/writ petitioner, were set aside. The
tendering authorities were directed to initiate a fresh e-Auction process, by
giving an opportunity to all the eligible bidders to participate and to
complete the process within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt
of the order of His Lordship.
