Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur
Suryadev S/O Bhawanishankar vs State Of Rajasthan on 9 July, 2026
[2026:RJ-JP:25795]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7762/2026
URN: CRLMB / 14117U / 2026
Suryadev S/o Bhawanishankar, R/o Village Kadyyanohar, Police
Station Chhabra, District Baran, Rajasthan. (Presently Lodged In
District Jail, Baran)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sudhir Jain
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order
09/07/2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under
Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.35/2010 registered at Police
Station Chhabra, District Baran for offences under Sections 147,
148, 149, 323, 307 and 302 of IPC.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned
Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner
has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that,
though allegations have been levelled against the petitioner of
causing the murder of the deceased, Ramesh, and inflicting
injuries upon the injured persons, namely Bhuralal, Chhittarlal and
Ramkalyan, the medical evidence does not establish that injuries
sustained by the injured persons are dangerous to life. He submits
that the specific role of causing the fatal injuries to the
(Uploaded on 13/07/2026 at 10:21:51 AM)
(Downloaded on 15/07/2026 at 12:00:33 AM)
[2026:RJ-JP:25795] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7762/2026]
deceased, Ramesh, has been attributed to the co-accused, Suresh
and Prakash. It is further submitted that no overt act has been
attributed to the present petitioner in causing any injury either to
the deceased, Ramesh, or to any of the injured persons. Petitioner
is behind the bars since 09.04.2026. Charge-sheet has been filed.
The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no
fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in
further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be
allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail
application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material
available on record and in light of submissions made by learned
counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on
merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail
to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483
B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Suryadev
S/o Bhawanishankar, be released on bail provided he furnishes
a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the
sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial
court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on
all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J
24/Arun
(Uploaded on 13/07/2026 at 10:21:51 AM)
(Downloaded on 15/07/2026 at 12:00:33 AM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
