Mukesh Pandit vs The State Of Bihar on 13 July, 2026

    0
    7
    ADVERTISEMENT

    1. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant and

    learned counsel for the respondent-State of Bihar.

    SPONSORED

    2. Leave granted.

    3. Appellant has preferred this Criminal Appeal against

    the impugned order dated 03.11.2025 passed by the High

    Court of Patna (briefly the ‘High Court’ hereinafter),

    rejecting his application for anticipatory bail.

    4. It is stated that appellant is apprehending his

    arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.747C of 2022

    registered under Sections 498A and 323 of the Indian Penal

    Code, 1860 (in short ‘IPC’) read with Sections 3/4 of the

    Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. On the ground that appellant

    was declared as a proclaimed offender, the prayer for

    anticipatory bail was turned down by the High Court.

    Reason: 5. From the Record of Proceedings before this Court, we

    find that appellant had assailed the order whereby he was

    declared as a proclaimed offender before the High Court.

    Finally, by the order dated 24.04.2026, the High Court had

    set aside the order declaring the appellant as a

    proclaimed offender.



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here