Bhagwan Sahay S/O Ramchandra vs State Govt. Through Tehsildar on 7 July, 2026

    0
    3
    ADVERTISEMENT

    and also considered by the learned Single Judge while passing the

    impugned order. However, despite passing of such orders, the

    SPONSORED

    State Revenue Authorities, by their intentional silent act, are not

    taking necessary action under Section 82, 175 and 214 of the Act

    of 1955 as noted above, in respect of the transfer of land in the

    State of Rajasthan, in violation of Section 42(b) of the Act of

    1955. This Court has noted that State Revenue Authorities are

    acting contray to the mandate of Section 42(b) by allowing such

    easy illegal transfer in the hands of private person.

    This Court cannot shut its eyes to this important issue and

    allow such illegality to perpetuate as no authority can be allowed

    to act contrary to the constitutional and statutory provisions. Once

    it is provided under the statutory laws that transfer, in violation of

    section 42(b) is void ab initio, and is well within the knowledge of

    all Revenue Authorities, including the sarpanch and other persons,

    no further act including mutation and other exercise can be

    allowed. The revenue officials of the State are frustrating the

    mandate of Section 42(b).



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here