Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur
Aabid S/O Majid vs State Of Rajasthan on 6 July, 2026
[2026:RJ-JP:24992]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9185/2026
URN: CRLMB / 16817U / 2026
Aabid S/o Majid, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Dharamshala, Police
Station Kaithwara, District Deeg.
(At Present Confined At District Jail, Deeg)
---Accused-Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Its PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bal Ram Vashisth
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Gupta, PP
Mr. Tara Chand, CI, SHO, Kaithwara,
Deeg
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA
Judgment / Order
06/07/2026
1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483
of BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 25.05.2026 passed by the
learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Brijnagar, District
Deeg, in Criminal Misc. Case (CIS) No.292/2026, whereby the bail
application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R.
No.215/2023, Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg for the
offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 384 & 120-B of
the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner
is not named in the FIR. He further submits that the FIR was
lodged in the year 2023. He also submits that the petitioner is in
custody since 25.04.2026. In the present matter, he was taken
into custody on a production warrant on 15.05.2026.
(Uploaded on 08/07/2026 at 11:11:06 AM)
(Downloaded on 10/07/2026 at 12:09:43 AM)
[2026:RJ-JP:24992] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-9185/2026]
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the
petitioner has been arrayed as an accused solely on the basis of
the disclosure statement of the co-accused, wherein it has been
stated that the petitioner used to provide bank accounts on a
rental/commission basis. He further submits that the petitioner
has been falsely implicated in the present case. He submits that
except for four other cases, there is no past criminal antecedent
against the petitioner. Out of those four cases, the petitioner has
already been enlarged on bail by the learned Trial Court in one
case, and by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in another case.
The remaining two cases are pending before this Bench today. He
also submits that the offences are triable by a Magistrate.
Moreover, the conclusion of the trial is likely to take a considerable
period of time. Co-accused has already been enlarged on bail.
Therefore, he prays that the petitioner be enlarged on bail.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail
application.
5. The Investigating Officer was called upon and submits that
the allegation against the petitioner is that the co-accused, in their
disclosure statements, stated that the petitioner used to provide
bank accounts on a commission/rental basis. On being asked by
this Court, the Investigating Officer fairly submits that no bank
accounts standing in the name of the petitioner has been
identified.
6. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public
Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
7. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and
considering the fact that the offences are triable by a Magistrate;
(Uploaded on 08/07/2026 at 11:11:06 AM)
(Downloaded on 10/07/2026 at 12:09:43 AM)
[2026:RJ-JP:24992] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-9185/2026]
petitioner is not named in the FIR; and that, till date, as per the
investigation, there is no material to show that the petitioner had
provided any bank account, either in his own name or in the name
of any other person, co-accused have already been enlarged on
bail, investigation/trial will take considerable time, offences are
triable by Magistrate, this Court is of the considered opinion that
the present bail application deserves to be allowed, subject to the
imposition of stringent conditions.
8. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered
that the accused-petitioner namely- Aabid S/o Majid arrested in
connection with F.I.R. No.215/2023, Police Station Kaithwara,
District Deeg, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a
personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two
sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the
satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that he
shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing and as
and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject
to the following conditions:
(i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the
permission of the Court;
(ii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to
the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the
commission of which he is suspected;
(iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make
any inducement, threat or promise to any person
acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade
him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any
police officer or tamper with the evidence; and
(iv) In the event the petitioner is found involved in any
other case of similar nature in the future, the
prosecution shall be at liberty to move an appropriate
application before the learned trial Court for cancellation
of the bail granted herein.
(Uploaded on 08/07/2026 at 11:11:06 AM)
(Downloaded on 10/07/2026 at 12:09:43 AM)
[2026:RJ-JP:24992] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-9185/2026]
(v) The accused-petitioner shall mark his presence
before the concerned police station once in a month as
fixed by the Investigating Officer and a register shall be
maintained for the same by Investigating Officer.
(vi) In case of any change of residential address, the
accused-petitioner shall immediately inform the
Investigating Officer as well as the trial Court.
(BIPIN GUPTA),J
Sudha/42
(Uploaded on 08/07/2026 at 11:11:06 AM)
(Downloaded on 10/07/2026 at 12:09:43 AM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
