Sanjay Yadav vs The State Of Jharkhand on 6 July, 2026

    0
    5
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Jharkhand High Court

    Sanjay Yadav vs The State Of Jharkhand on 6 July, 2026

    Author: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

    Bench: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

                                                      [ 2026:JHHC:19712]
    
    
          IN     THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                              A.B.A. No. 3583 of 2026
          Sanjay Yadav, aged about 31 years, Son of Surendra
          Yadav, R/o Village Dakadari, P.O. and P.S. Bariyatu,
          District Ranchi.
                                                       .....   ... Petitioner
                                    Versus
          The State of Jharkhand
                                                       ..... ...     Opposite Party
                                 --------
    

    CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

    ——

    SPONSORED

    For the Petitioner : Mr. Saurabh Shekhar, Advocate.

                                 :        Mrs. Akriti Shree, Advocate.
          For the State          :        Mr. V.S. Sahay, A.P.P.
                                 ------
    

    05/ 06.07.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P

    for the State.

    2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with

    Bariyatu P.S. Case No. 26 of 2026, registered for the offence under

    Sections 15(b), 18(C), 22(b) and 25 of NDPS Act, pending in the court

    of learned Special Judge, NDPS, Latehar.

    3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that

    the petitioner is a farmer and the alleged contraband of 11.900 Kgs.

    has been recovered from the premises of a school and only the security

    guard of that school has stated that this petitioner and another person

    have kept the said contraband there. He next submits that the quantity

    of contraband is intermediary. He then submits that although, two

    criminal antecedents are there against the petitioner, however, in these

    two cases, the petitioner is already on bail. He further submits that if

    the Court is satisfied, the Court can grant the anticipatory bail in light

    of Section 37(b)(ii) of the NDPS Act. He next submits that the case has

    been registered under Sections 15(b), 18(c), 22(b) and 25 of NDPS

    Act, however, in light of Section 37(b)(ii), if the case is being under

    -1-
    [ 2026:JHHC:19712]

    Sections 19, 24 or 27(A) of the said Act cannot be released on bail. He

    also submits that the petitioner will co-operate in the investigation. He

    further submits that in the similar circumstance, the other co-accused

    has already been provided the privilege of anticipatory bail in A.B.A.

    No. 3465 of 2026 by this court. On these grounds, he submits that

    anticipatory bail may kindly be provided to the petitioner.

    4. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has vehemently

    opposed the prayer and submits that the petitioner is having criminal

    antecedents and in view of that custodial interrogation is required. On

    these grounds, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected.

    5. Admittedly, the said contraband has been recovered from

    the premises of a school and not from the possession of this petitioner

    and only the security guard of that school has disclosed the name of

    this petitioner and another and the said contraband is said to be

    intermediary in quantity and anticipatory bail or regular bail is for the

    limited purpose and it is confined to the question of releasing the

    accused on bail and at this stage, the court is called upon to see if there

    is reasonable grounds for believing that the accused is not guilty and

    records its satisfaction about the existence of such grounds. But the

    court has not to consider the matter, as if it is pronouncing a judgment

    of acquittal and recording a finding of not guilty. Further in the similar

    circumstance, the other co-accused has already been provided the

    privilege of anticipatory bail in the aforementioned A.B.A. by this

    court.

    6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am

    inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

    7. Accordingly, the above-named petitioner is directed to
    -2-
    [ 2026:JHHC:19712]

    surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today and

    in the event of his arrest or surrender, he shall be enlarged on bail on

    furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two

    sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special

    Judge, NDPS, Latehar, in connection with Bariyatu P.S. Case No. 26 of

    2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of

    the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

    (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
    Dated:-06.07.2026
    Amitesh/-

    -3-



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here