Nand Kishore Ram vs The State Of Jharkhand on 6 July, 2026

Supreme Court – Daily Orders

Nand Kishore Ram vs The State Of Jharkhand on 6 July, 2026

     ITEM NO.21                             COURT NO.12                     SECTION X

                                  S U P R E M E C O U R T O F         I N D I A
                                          RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

                              WRIT PETITION(S)(CRIMINAL) DIARY NO. 36165/2023


     NAND KISHORE RAM                                                       Petitioner(s)

                                                    VERSUS

     THE STATE OF JHARKHAND                                                 Respondent(s)

     FOR ADMISSION
     IA No. 176578/2026 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING /                          CURING THE
     DEFECTS
     IA No. 176579/2026 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

     Date : 06-07-2026 This matter was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA
                          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
                          (PARTIAL COURT WORKING DAYS BENCH)


     For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, Adv.
                         Mr. Vipin Kumar Saxena Adv.
                         Mr. Harsh Chaturvedi, Adv.
                         Mr. Abhay Kumar Singh, Adv.
                         M/s. Mukesh Kumar Singh And Co., AOR

     For Respondent(s) :

                              UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                 O R D E R

1. Delay in refiling is condoned.

2. This petition under Article 32 of the

SPONSORED

Constitution seeks further investigation on FIR No.

233 of 2007, so that the charge could be altered from

one under Section 302 IPC to Section 304 IPC.
Signature Not Verified

3. It is noticed from the record that the said
Digitally signed by
PRIYANKA MALIK
Date: 2026.07.07
15:41:16 IST
Reason: first information report was not only investigated

but, on submission of police report, a trial was held

1
which resulted in conviction of the accused under

Section 302 IPC. The conviction was affirmed by the

High Court and, thereafter, a special leave petition

preferred before this Court was dismissed.

4. In such circumstances, this petition is

completely misconceived, and is, accordingly,

dismissed.

5. Pending applications, if any, shall stand

disposed of.

(PRIYANKA MALIK)                                      (SAPNA BANSAL)
COURT MASTER (SH)                                   COURT MASTER (NSH)




                                    2