Ganoo Dhobi vs The State Of Jharkhand …. Opposite … on 6 July, 2026

    0
    8
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Jharkhand High Court

    Ganoo Dhobi vs The State Of Jharkhand …. Opposite … on 6 July, 2026

    Author: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

    Bench: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

                                                                    2026:JHHC:19690
    
    
    
    
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
                                        ----
    

    A.B.A. No. 3542 of 2026

    —-

    SPONSORED

    Ganoo Dhobi, aged about 76 years, son of late Bhadu Rajak,
    resident of Village Tursabad, Khario, PO Khario, PS Hariharpur,
    District Dhanbad, Jharkhand …. Petitioner

    — Versus —

    The State of Jharkhand …. Opposite Party

    —-

    CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

    For the Petitioner :- Mr. Raj Nandan Chatterjee, Advocate
    For the State :- Mr. Bishwambhar Shastri, Advocate

    —-

    2/06.07.2026 Heard learned counsels for petitioner and for State.

    2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection

    with Baghmara PS Case No.65 of 2022, for offence registered under

    section 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 326, 307, 353, 337, 338, 379,

    427, 447, 504, 506, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code and section 4

    and 21 of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act,

    1957, Rules, 7,9 and 13 of Jharkhand Minerals (Prevention of Illegal

    Mining, Transportation and Storage) Rules, 2017 and Sectio 27 of

    Arms Act, pending in court of learned Sub Divisional Judicial

    Magistrate, Dhanbad.

    3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the allegations

    are made that 90-100 persons have tried to enter into the railway

    side to take the coal. He next submits that the petitioner is aged

    about 76 years and the motorcycle of the petitioner was parked

    nearby and in view of that the petitioner has been made accused.

    He next submits that the co-accused persons have been granted
    1
    2026:JHHC:19690

    anticipatory bail by this Court by way of Annexure-3 Series. He next

    submits that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as

    disclosed in paragraph no.11 of the petition.

    4. Learned State counsel opposes prayer and submits that the

    allegations are there of entering into the railway side for theft of

    coal.

    5. Considering that in identical situation, the co-accused

    persons have been granted anticipatory bail by way of Annexure-3

    series and the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent as

    aforesaid and such allegation is made against 90-100 persons, I am

    inclined to grant anticipatory bail to petitioner.

    6. Accordingly, petitioner, above named, is hereby directed to

    surrender before learned court within three weeks from today, and

    in event of his surrender/arrest, petitioner, above named, shall be

    released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees

    Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of like amount each, to

    satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad,

    in connection with Baghmara PS Case No.65 of 2022, subject to the

    conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of Bhartiya Nagrik

    Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023.

    ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
    06.07.2026
    SI/

    2



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here