Girvarlal Chaudhary vs State Of Rajasthan on 2 July, 2026

    0
    5
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur

    Girvarlal Chaudhary vs State Of Rajasthan on 2 July, 2026

    Author: Sameer Jain

    Bench: Sameer Jain

           HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                           JODHPUR
    
                  S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10073/2026
    
    Girvarlal Chaudhary
                                                                      ----Petitioner
                                       Versus
    State Of Rajasthan
                                                                    ----Respondent
                                 Connected With
                  S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 21675/2025
    Girvarlal Chaudhary
                                                                      ----Petitioner
                                       Versus
    State Of Rajasthan
                                                                    ----Respondent
    
    
    For Petitioner(s)        :     Mr. Mohit Sharma &
                                   Mr. Harshvardhan Thanvi
    For Respondent(s)        :     Mr. Vijay Purohit
                                   Mr. Pradeep Singh Rajpurohit &
                                   Mr. Hanuman Singh Gour
    
    
    
                 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN

    Order

    02/07/2026

    SPONSORED

    In S.B. Civil Writ Petition Nos. 10073/2026 and

    21675/2025:

    The instant petitions have been filed with the following

    prayers:

    “In SBCWP No. 10073/2026:-

    A) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction,
    quashing and setting aside the impugned action of
    the respondents whereby the petitioner’s application
    dated 17.10.2024 submitted under Section 90-A has
    been “auto closed” on 23.11.2024, being illegal,
    arbitrary, non-speaking and violative of the principles
    of natural justice.

    B) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction
    directing the respondents to restore/revive the
    petitioner’s application dated 17.10.2024 to its
    (Uploaded on 04/07/2026 at 12:39:21 PM)
    (Downloaded on 06/07/2026 at 08:49:44 PM)
    (2 of 10) [CW-10073/2026]

    original position and to consider and decide the same
    afresh, strictly in accordance with law;
    C) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction
    declaring that the impugned “auto-closure” action,
    being uncommunicated and not passed by a
    competent authority, is void ab initio and non est in
    the eyes of law;

    D) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction
    directing the respondents to act in accordance with
    the binding State Government notifications/circulars
    dated 01.07.2022, 14.07.2022 and 28.07.2022 and
    to consider the petitioner’s case for conversion
    accordingly, including initiation of suo motu
    proceedings, if applicable.

    In SBCWP No. 21675/2025:-

    A) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, quash
    and set aside the impugned order dated 09.05.2025
    (Annexure-06) and the seizure action dated
    28.05.2025 (Annexure-07) passed and executed by
    the officials of the Udaipur Development Authority,
    Udaipur.

    B) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, Direct
    the respondents to forthwith remove the seal and
    restore possession of the petitioner’s property
    situated at Khasra No. 2451 (Part) and 2452 (Part),
    Revenue Village Titardi, District Udaipur to the
    petitioner;

    C) By an appropriate writ, order or direction,
    Declare that the petitioner’s application dated
    04.11.2024 for conversion of land use be deemed to
    have been approved under Rule 7 of the Rules of
    2012, and direct the respondents to issue the
    necessary conversion order and NOC in favour of the
    petitioner;

    D) By an appropriate writ, order or direction,
    Declare that the petitioner, being a registered
    enterprise under the Rajasthan MSME (Facilitation of
    Establishment and Operation) Act, 2019
    , is entitled to
    exemption from any prior approval/NOC for the
    prescribed period and restrain the respondents from
    taking any coercive steps against the petitioner’s
    property;

    E) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, Direct
    the respondents to compensate the petitioner for the
    loss and damages suffered due to illegal seizure,

    (Uploaded on 04/07/2026 at 12:39:21 PM)
    (Downloaded on 06/07/2026 at 08:49:44 PM)
    (3 of 10) [CW-10073/2026]

    including the loss of scrap materials and the
    consequential business loss, as may be determined by
    this Hon’ble Court;

    F) Issue any other appropriate writ, order or
    direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem just and
    proper in the facts and circumstances of the present
    case; and
    G) Award costs of this writ petition to the
    petitioner.”

    At the outset, learned counsel appearing for and on behalf of

    the petitioner(s) have submitted that due to non-functionality of

    the Appellate Tribunal concerned, the petitioner(s) is/are left with

    no remedy, other than to make a plea to invoke the writ

    jurisdiction of this Court.

    Heard.

    List these matters after one week.

    In Suo Moto :

    1. Upon perusal of the instant batch of writ petitions, and while

    exercising jurisdiction in terms of the present roster, it is observed

    that the petitions have been instituted under Article 226 of the

    Constitution of India, laying challenge to various actions,

    omissions, and orders emanating from the quasi-judicial

    authorities and officers functioning under the aegis of the Udaipur

    Development Authority, the Jodhpur Development Authority, and

    the Bikaner Development Authority (hereinafter collectively

    referred to as ‘the Development Authorities’).

    2. During the course of hearing, this Court has been

    constrained to take judicial notice of a grave and systemic

    administrative lapse of far-reaching consequences. It has emerged

    that the governing statutes of the aforesaid Development

    Authorities, namely, the Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959,

    (Uploaded on 04/07/2026 at 12:39:21 PM)
    (Downloaded on 06/07/2026 at 08:49:44 PM)
    (4 of 10) [CW-10073/2026]

    the Udaipur Development Authority Act, 2023, the Bikaner

    Development Authority Development Act, 2025 and the Jodhpur

    Development Authority Act, 2009, along with analogous statutory

    frameworks contain pari materia provisions mandating the

    constitution of specialized Appellate Tribunals. By way of

    illustration, it can be jot down that a conjoint reading of Section

    77 of the Jodhpur Development Authority Act, 2009 unmistakably

    manifests the legislative intent to create a specialized adjudicatory

    forum, thereby ensuring that disputes arising from the actions of

    the Authority are first subjected to statutory scrutiny before

    invocation of constitutional remedies, similarly Section 80 of the

    Udaipur Development Authority Act, 2023 and the Bikaner

    Development Authority Development Act, 2025, unequivocally

    provides for the constitution of learned Tribunal by the State

    Government, which is vested with the jurisdiction to adjudicate

    disputes and entertain appeals arising from orders or notices

    issued by the Authority. For the sake of handiness the relevant

    provisions as relied and referred ad supra are reproduced

    hereinbelow:

    “77. Constitution of Tribunal (Jodhpur
    Development Authority Act, 2009
    ):-
    (1) The State Government shall, by notification in the
    Official Gazette, constitute a Tribunal for the purposes
    of this Act.

    (2) The Tribunal shall consist of one person who shall
    be an officer of the State Government and shall be
    paid such salary and allowances as may be determined
    by the State Government.

    (3) The State Government may, to assist the Tribunal,
    direct the Authority to appoint such number of

    (Uploaded on 04/07/2026 at 12:39:21 PM)
    (Downloaded on 06/07/2026 at 08:49:44 PM)
    (5 of 10) [CW-10073/2026]

    servants and of such cadre as may be deemed
    necessary.

    (4) The expenses of the Tribunal shall be borne by the
    Authority.

    (5) The procedure to be followed by the Tribunal in
    deciding the appeals or disputes referred to it under
    this Act shall be such as may be prescribed.
    (6) The Tribunal shall have the same powers as are
    vested in a civil court under the Code of Civil
    Procedure
    , 1908 (Central Act No. V of 1908) in respect
    of hearing and deciding of an appeal or any dispute
    referred to it.

    (7) Except as otherwise provided, any dispute arising
    out of any provision of this Act may be referred to the
    Tribunal by the Authority. The decision of the Tribunal
    shall be final and binding on all the parties thereto.
    (8) Except as otherwise provided-

    (a) any person aggrieved by an order or notice of the
    Authority may file an appeal in the Tribunal within
    thirty days of the communication of such order or
    notice to him; and

    (b) any person aggrieved by any threatened act or
    injury from the Authority affecting his rights may refer
    the dispute to the Tribunal within thirty days of the
    communication or knowledge of such threatened act or
    injury;

    and the decision of the Tribunal shall be final.

    Section- 80. Constitution of Tribunal (Udaipur
    Development Authority Development Act, 2023):-

    (1) The State Government shall, by notification in the
    Official Gazette, constitute a Tribunal for the purposes
    of this Act.

    (2) The Tribunal shall consist of one person who shall
    be an officer of the State Government and shall be

    (Uploaded on 04/07/2026 at 12:39:21 PM)
    (Downloaded on 06/07/2026 at 08:49:44 PM)
    (6 of 10) [CW-10073/2026]

    paid such salary and allowances as may be determined
    by the State Government.

    (3) The State Government may, to assist the Tribunal,
    direct the Authority to appoint such number of
    employees and of such cadre as may be deemed
    necessary.

    (4) The expenses of the Tribunal shall be borne by
    the Authority.

    (5) The procedure to be followed by the Tribunal in
    deciding the appeals or disputes referred to it under
    this Act shall be such as may be prescribed.
    (6) The Tribunal shall have the same powers as are
    vested in a civil court under the Code of Civil
    Procedure
    , 1908 (Central Act No. 5 of 1908) in respect
    of hearing and deciding of an appeal or any dispute
    referred to it.

    (7) Except as otherwise provided, any dispute arising
    out of any provision of this Act may be referred to the
    Tribunal by the Authority. The decision of the Tribunal
    shall be final and binding on all the parties thereto.
    (8) Except as otherwise provided,-

    (a) any person aggrieved by an order or notice of the
    Authority may file an appeal in the Tribunal within
    thirty days of the communication of such order or
    notice to him; and

    (b) any person aggrieved by any threatened act or
    injury from the Authority affecting his rights may refer
    the dispute to the Tribunal within thirty days of the
    communication or knowledge of such threatened act or
    injury, and the decision of the Tribunal shall be final.”

    80. Constitution of Tribunal (Bikaner
    Development Authority Development Act, 2025):-

    (1) The State Government shall, by notification in the
    Official Gazette, constitute a Tribunal for the purposes
    of this Act.

    (Uploaded on 04/07/2026 at 12:39:21 PM)
    (Downloaded on 06/07/2026 at 08:49:44 PM)
    (7 of 10) [CW-10073/2026]

    (2) The Tribunal shall consist of one person who shall
    be an officer of the State Government and shall be
    paid such salary and allowances as may be determined
    by the State Government.

    (3) The State Government may, to assist the Tribunal,
    direct the Authority to appoint such number of
    employees and of such cadre as may be deemed
    necessary.

    (4) The expenses of the Tribunal shall be borne by the
    Authority.

    (5) The procedure to be followed by the Tribunal in
    deciding the appeals or disputes referred to it under
    this Act shall be such as may be prescribed.
    (6) The Tribunal shall have the same powers as are
    vested in a civil court under the Code of Civil
    Procedure
    , 1908 (Central Act No. 5 of 1908) in respect
    of hearing and deciding of an appeal or any dispute
    referred to it.

    (7) Except as otherwise provided, any dispute arising
    out of any provision of this Act may be referred to the
    Tribunal by the Authority. The decision of the Tribunal
    shall be final and binding on all the parties thereto.
    (8) Except as otherwise provided,-

    (a) any person aggrieved by an order or notice of the
    Authority may file an appeal in the Tribunal within
    thirty days of the communication of such order or
    notice to him; and

    (b) any person aggrieved by any threatened act or
    injury from the Authority affecting his rights may refer
    the dispute to the Tribunal within thirty days of the
    communication or knowledge of such threatened act or
    injury, and the decision of the Tribunal shall be final.”

    3. These statutory tribunals are conceived as primary forums to

    ensure efficacious, specialized, and expeditious redressal of

    (Uploaded on 04/07/2026 at 12:39:21 PM)
    (Downloaded on 06/07/2026 at 08:49:44 PM)
    (8 of 10) [CW-10073/2026]

    grievances of citizens aggrieved by developmental and regulatory

    actions. However, notwithstanding the explicit legislative mandate,

    the State Government has failed to constitute and operationalize

    these Appellate Tribunals. This failure is not merely procedural but

    strikes at the root of access to justice, effectively rendering

    litigants remediless at the foundational level.

    4. The inevitable consequence of such executive inaction is the

    inundation of this Court with writ petitions that would otherwise

    have been adjudicated by the statutorily prescribed forums. It is a

    trite and well-settled principle that the writ jurisdiction under

    Article 226 is discretionary and ordinarily ought not to be invoked

    where an efficacious alternative remedy exists. The Hon’ble

    Supreme Court in Whirlpool Corporation v. Registrar of

    Trademarks, Mumbai: (1998) 8 SCC 1 authoritatively held that

    the High Court should refrain from exercising writ jurisdiction

    where adequate alternative remedies are available, save in

    exceptional circumstances. Likewise, in Assistant Collector of

    Central Excise v. Dunlop India Ltd.: (1985) 1 SCC 260, the

    Apex Court cautioned against bypassing statutory remedies.

    However, the present situation presents a paradox of

    constitutional significance. The alternative remedy contemplated

    by statute is illusory due to the non-constitution of the tribunals.

    In L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India: (1997) 3 SCC 261,

    the Hon’ble Supreme Court underscored the importance of

    tribunals as integral components of the justice delivery system,

    while maintaining the supervisory jurisdiction of High Courts. The

    absence of such tribunals thus disrupts the carefully calibrated

    constitutional balance.

    (Uploaded on 04/07/2026 at 12:39:21 PM)
    (Downloaded on 06/07/2026 at 08:49:44 PM)
    (9 of 10) [CW-10073/2026]

    5. Furthermore, given the rapid urbanization and exponential

    infrastructural expansion in cities such as Udaipur, Jodhpur, and

    Bikaner, disputes pertaining to land use, zoning, allotments, and

    regulatory compliance are witnessing a consistent and alarming

    surge. The magnitude of the impending crisis may be appreciated

    by drawing a parallel with the Jaipur Development Authority

    Appellate Tribunal, where an overwhelming backlog of cases

    reportedly runs into lakhs, and thus, the failure to establish similar

    tribunals in other regions portends a situation of judicial paralysis

    and denial of timely justice.

    6. This Court cannot remain a silent spectator to such systemic

    erosion of statutory rights and institutional mechanisms; and is

    otherwise of a view that ‘where the law ordains a remedy but the

    State withholds the forum, justice is not merely delayed, it is

    institutionally denied. Courts then do not overreach by

    intervening; they simply step in where governance has abdicated’.

    The constitutional mandate under Article 226 of the Constitution of

    India, being wide and plenary, empowers this Court not only to

    adjudicate disputes but also to issue appropriate directions to

    ensure that statutory authorities discharge their obligations in

    accordance with law. The power of this Court to take suo motu

    cognizance flows inherently from its constitutional role as a

    sentinel on the qui vive.

    7. In light of the foregoing discussion, and upon an anxious and

    considered evaluation of the prevailing administrative vacuum and

    its deleterious impact on the justice delivery system, this Court

    deems it appropriate to invoke its inherent powers and take suo

    motu cognizance of the matter in larger public interest.

    (Uploaded on 04/07/2026 at 12:39:21 PM)
    (Downloaded on 06/07/2026 at 08:49:44 PM)
    (10 of 10) [CW-10073/2026]

    8. To assist this Court in addressing the complex issues of

    institutional reform and statutory compliance, the learned

    President of the Rajasthan High Court Lawyers’ Association,

    Jodhpur, Shri Dilip Singh Udawat, is hereby appointed as amicus

    curiae. The amicus shall render assistance on questions pertaining

    to statutory interpretation, administrative feasibility, and

    comparative institutional frameworks.

    9. Accordingly, and in light of the provisions enumerated in

    Rule 385-Q of the Rules of the High Court of Judicature for

    Rajasthan, 1952 the Registrar (Judicial) is directed to register the

    aforesaid as a Public Interest Litigation. The same be placed

    before the Hon’ble Acting Chief Justice with a request for his kind

    consideration, passing of appropriate administrative orders and for

    assignment to a competent Bench in accordance with the roster.

    (SAMEER JAIN),J
    37-38-Pooja/-

    (Uploaded on 04/07/2026 at 12:39:21 PM)
    (Downloaded on 06/07/2026 at 08:49:44 PM)

    Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here