Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur
Ram Lal vs State Of Rajasthan on 4 July, 2026
[2026:RJ-JD:29322]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8601/2026
1. Ram Lal S/o Mohan Lal Suthar, Aged About 53 Years,
Residents Of Gadari Kheda, Police Station Kotri, District
Bhilwara, (Raj). (Petitiners Is Lodged In Sub Jail
Mandalgarh)
2. Heera Lal Suthar S/o Mohan Lal Suthar Aged About 38
Years, Residents Of Gadari Kheda, Police Station Kotri,
District Bhilwara, (Raj). (Petitiners Is Lodged In Sub Jail
Mandalgarh)
3. Hemraj, S/o Kalu Lal Bheel, Aged About 19 Years,
Residents Of Gadari Kheda, Police Station Kotri, District
Bhilwara, (Raj). (Petitiners Is Lodged In Sub Jail
Mandalgarh)
4. Kishan Daroga S/o Mahendra Daroga, Aged About 25
Years, Residents Of Gadari Kheda, Police Station Kotri,
District Bhilwara, (Raj). (Petitiners Is Lodged In Sub Jail
Mandalgarh)
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhimanyu Joshi (through VC)
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sameer Pareek, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL BENIWAL
Order
04/07/2026
1. This application for bail has been filed by the petitioners
under Section 483 of BNSS (old Section 439 of Cr.P.C.). The
requisite details of the matter are tabulated herein below:
S.No. Particulars of the Case
1. FIR Number 0139/2026
(Uploaded on 04/07/2026 at 12:22:12 PM)
(Downloaded on 04/07/2026 at 08:26:55 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:29322] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8601/2026]
2. Date of lodging FIR 19.06.2026
3. Concerned Police Station Kotri
4. District Bhilwara
5. Offences alleged in the FIR Under Sections 303(2) and
112(2) of BNS, 2023 and
Section 4/21 of Mines and
Minerals (Development and
Regulation) Act, 1957
6. Offences added, if any –
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case and false
allegations have been levelled against them. He submits that
except against petitioner-Ram Lal there are no criminal
antecedents against the other petitioners and that too, pertains to
the offence under Sections 279 and 304A, IPC registered in the
year 2023. The offence alleged against the petitioners are triable
by Magistrate. The petitioner- Ram Lal is in judicial custody since
18.06.2026 and petitioners- Heera Lal Suthar, Hemraj and Kishan
Daroga are in judicial custody since 19.06.2026 and the trial will
take sufficiently long time, therefore, they deserve to be enlarged
on bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes this bail
application.
4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Public
Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
5. Having considered the rival submissions, facts and
circumstances of this case so also the fact that offence alleged
against the present petitioners is triable by Magistrate and there
are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners except against
(Uploaded on 04/07/2026 at 12:22:12 PM)
(Downloaded on 04/07/2026 at 08:26:55 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:29322] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8601/2026]
petitioner-Ram Lal and that too, pertains to offence under Section
279 and 304A, IPC registered in the year 2023, in the considered
opinion of this Court, no fruitful purpose would be served by
keeping the petitioners behind the bars for an indefinite period as
the trial will take sufficiently long time. Thus, without expressing
any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is of the
opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioners deserves to
be accepted.
6. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 of
BNSS is allowed. It is ordered that petitioners- Ram Lal S/o
Mohan Lal Suthar, Heera Lal Suthar S/o Mohan Lal Suthar,
Hemraj, S/o Kalu Lal Bheel and Kishan Daroga S/o
Mahendra Daroga, shall be released on bail in connection with
the aforesaid FIR; provided they execute personal bond in the
sum of Rs.50,000/- each with two sound and solvent sureties of
Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for their
appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing
and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.
7. It is however, made clear that findings recorded/observations
made above are for limited purposes of adjudication of bail
application. The trial court shall not get prejudiced by the same.
(SUNIL BENIWAL),J
10-AbhishekK/-
(Uploaded on 04/07/2026 at 12:22:12 PM)
(Downloaded on 04/07/2026 at 08:26:55 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
