Patna High Court – Orders
Mahesh Ram vs The State Of Bihar on 26 May, 2026
Author: Harish Kumar
Bench: Harish Kumar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No.735 of 2008
======================================================
Mahesh Ram, son of Late Ram Chandra Ram, resident of Village- Desri,
Police Station Desri, District- Vaishali
... ... Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Respondent
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Appellant : Mr. Arbind Kr.Singh 1, Advocate
For the Respondent : Smt. Shashi Bala Verma, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
5 26-05-2026
Perused the report dated 12.05.2026 of the
Superintendent of Police, Vaishali along with the report dated
11.05.2026 of the A.S.H.O., Desari Police Station, Vaishali,
which indicate that the sole appellant Mahesh Ram is dead and
the death certificate of the appellant is annexed with the said
report.
2. In view of the said reports as also section 394 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, which corresponds to
section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023,
since no near relative has filed any application for leave to
continue the appeal and having regard to the settled position of
Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.735 of 2008(5) dt.26-05-2026
2/3
law as enunciated by the Hon’ble Division Bench of the High
Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Santosh Kumar Baranwal
v. State of UP, reported in 2010 SCC OnLine All 974, wherein
it has been categorically held that upon conviction under
Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, the imposition of
fine is discretionary in nature and does not partake the character
of a mandatory requirement, and the legal position affirmed by
the Hon’ble Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at
Bombay in Gopala Balu Kamble v. State of Maharashtra,
reported in 2011 SCC OnLine Bom 1290 being in consonance
therewith, and whereas the appellant has since expired during
the pendency of the present appeal and the conviction sought to
be assailed pertains to the year 2007, and the State does not
intend to pursue the recovery of the fine amount as imposed by
the learned Trial Court, this Court, upon due consideration of
the aforesaid facts, circumstances and settled legal position,
hereby sets aside the order of imposition of fine passed by the
learned Trial Court, and since the appeal insofar as it pertains to
the sentence of imprisonment stands abated consequent upon the
demise of the appellant, the present appeal is disposed of as
having abated in its entirety.
3. Let the trial court record be sent back to the
Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.735 of 2008(5) dt.26-05-2026
3/3
concerned court immediately, if not required in any other case.
(Sangam Kumar Sahoo, CJ)
(Harish Kumar, J)
shailendra/-
U
