Patna High Court – Orders
Rahul Sah @ Rahul Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 20 May, 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34744 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-500 Year-2023 Thana- KESARIA District- East Champaran
======================================================
Rahul Sah @ Rahul Kumar S/o Lalan Sah Resident of village - Kesariya
Purani Bazar, P.S - Kesariya, District - East Champaran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Abhishek Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Raj Ballabh Singh, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 20-05-2026
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in
connection with Kesariya P.S. Case No. 500 of 2023 registered
for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 354
(B), 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution case, this petitioner inflicted
knife blows upon the informant several times and co-accused
Raushan Kumar caught hold her hair and also assaulted her due
to which her clothes got torn. It has further been alleged that
petitioner also gave lathi blows upon the neck of the son of the
informant.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted
that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34744 of 2026(2) dt.20-05-2026
2/3
this case. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the
petitioner referring to Annexure- 2 and 2/1, that the injury
sustained by the informant is simple in nature and the weapon
assigned is hard and blunt substance, the same is not
corroborated by the allegations levelled. As regards the injury
report of the son of the informant it has been submitted that the
same were bruises and abrasion and also the injuries were
opined to be simple in nature. It has further been submitted that
there is land dispute between the parties and there is delay of
seven days in lodging the present F.I.R. It has lastly been
submitted that petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently
opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and has
submitted that there is specific allegation against the petitioner
to have assaulted the informant and her son.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances
of the case as well as the nature of allegation against the
petitioner, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his
arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be
enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.
10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like
amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned in
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34744 of 2026(2) dt.20-05-2026
3/3
connection with Kesariya P.S. Case No. 500 of 2023, subject to
the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharitya
Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.)
7. This application stands allowed.
(Praveen Kumar, J)
vashudha/-
U T
