Xyz vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 21 May, 2026

    0
    35
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Chattisgarh High Court

    Xyz vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 21 May, 2026

    Author: Narendra Kumar Vyas

    Bench: Narendra Kumar Vyas

                                                                                                Page 1 of 6
    
    
    
    
                                                                                  2026:CGHC:23446
                                                                                                  NAFR
    
                                       HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
    
                                                      WPC No. 2616 of 2026
    
                          1 - XYZ (Particulars of Petitioner/ Victim In The Closed Envelop)
                                                                                           ... Petitioner(s)
                                                                versus
                          1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Ministry Of Public Health And
                          Welfare, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
                          2 - Collector Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
                          3 - Chairman District Medical Board, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
                          4 - Chief Medical Health Officer (Cmho) Medical Board Of Chhattisgarh
                          Institute Of Medical Science (Cims), Distt. Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
                          5 - Head Of Department (Hod) Department Of Gynaecology, Cims Bilaspur,
                          Distt. Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
                          6 - Station House Officer P.S. Civil Lines, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur,
                          Chhattisgarh.
                                                                                         ... Respondents

    For Petitioner : Mr. Amit Xalxo, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Chitendra
    Singh, Advocate.

    For State : Mr. Shobhit Mishra, Dy. Govt. Advocate.

    SPONSORED

    Hon’ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas
    Order on Board
    21/05/2026

    1. The petitioner is a victim of forcible sexual intercourse committed with

    her by the accused of Crime No. 193/2026 registered at Police Station-

    Civil Lines, District- Bilaspur (C.G.). As a result of said forcible sexual

    intercourse, the petitioner is carrying pregnancy, which she wants to

    abort, as the said pregnancy is causing her anguish and she does not

    want to have a child born out of a person who has ravished her without

    her consent and has subjected her to humility and embarrassment

    before the society.

    2. This petition has been filed on 15.05.2026 seeking a direction to the

    Digitally
    signed by
    ARUN
    ARUN KUMAR
    KUMAR DEWANGAN
    DEWANGAN Date:

    2026.05.21
    17:30:26
    +0530
    Page 2 of 6

    authorities to form a panel of expert medical practitioners for the

    purpose of termination of petitioner’s pregnancy. The petitioner also

    seeks direction to the respondents to admit her to Chhattisgarh Institute

    of Medical Science (CIMS) Bilaspur as early as possible for deputing

    the expert registered medical practitioners to cause termination of

    pregnancy.

    3. This Court vide order dated 19.05.2026 directed the Chief Medical &

    Health Officer, Bilaspur to examine the petitioner by team of experts

    one of which should be Gynecologist and to submit report in terms of

    Section 3(2) of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 (for

    short “the Act, 1971”) and the Rules framed under the Act of 1971.

    4. In compliance of the direction issued by this Court, the said authority

    examined the victim and submitted their report before this Court

    mentioning that the victim is carrying 14-16 weeks pregnancy.

    5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the

    documents placed on record with utmost satisfaction.

    6. The law with regard to the proceedings for termination of pregnancy

    has been framed in the Act, 1971 {as amended by the Medical

    Termination of Pregnancy (Amendment) Act, 2021} and Section 3 of the

    Act, 1971 specifically deals with the conditions. which are required and

    which have to be adhered to. For better understanding, Section 3 of the

    Act, 1971 is extracted below:-

    Section 3. When Pregnancies may be terminated by
    registered medical practitioners.-(1) Notwithstanding
    anything contained in the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), a
    registered medical practitioner shall not be guilty of any offence
    under that Code or under any other law for the time being in
    force, if any pregnancy is terminated by him in accordance with
    the provisions of this Act.

    Page 3 of 6

    (2) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (4), a pregnancy
    may be terminated by a registered medical practitioner,-

    (a) where the length of the pregnancy does not exceed twenty
    weeks, if such medical practitioner is, or

    (b) where the length of the pregnancy exceeds twenty weeks
    but does not exceed twenty-four weeks in case of such category
    of woman as may be prescribed by rules made under this Act, if
    not less than two registered medical practitioners are, of the
    opinion, formed in good faith, that,-

    (i) the continuance of the pregnancy would involve a risk to the
    life of the pregnant woman or of grave injury to her physical or
    mental health; or

    (ii) there is a substantial risk that if the child were born, it would
    suffer from any serious physical or mental abnormality.

    Explanation 1.-For the purposes of clause (a), where any
    pregnancy occurs as a result of failure of any device or method
    used by any woman or her partner for the purpose of limiting the
    number of children or preventing pregnancy, the anguish
    caused by such pregnancy shall be presumed to constitute a
    grave injury to the mental health of the pregnant woman.
    Explanation 2.-For the purposes of clauses (a) and (b), where
    any pregnancy is alleged by the pregnant woman to have been
    caused by rape, the anguish caused by the pregnancy shall be
    presumed to constitute a grave injury to the mental health of the
    pregnant woman.

    (2A) The norms for the registered medical practitioner whose
    opinion is required for termination of pregnancy at different
    gestational age shall be such as may be prescribed by rules
    made under this Act.

    (2B) The provisions of sub-section (2) relating to the length of
    the pregnancy shall not apply to the termination of pregnancy by
    the medical practitioner where such termination is necessitated
    by the diagnosis of any of the substantial foetal abnormalities
    diagnosed by a Medical Board.

    (2C) Every State Government or Union territory, as the case
    may be, shall, by notification in the Official Gazette, constitute a
    Board to be called a Medical Board for the purposes of this Act
    to exercise such powers and functions as may be prescribed by
    rules made under this Act. (2D) The Medical Board shall consist
    of the following, namely:-

    (a) a Gynaecologist;

    (b) a Paediatrician;

    (c) a Radiologist or Sonologist: and

    (d) such other number of members as may be notified in the
    Official Gazette by the State Government or Union territory, as
    the case may be.”

    (3) In determining whether the continuance of a pregnancy
    would involve such risk of injury to the health as is mentioned in
    Page 4 of 6

    sub-section (2), account may be taken of the pregnant woman’s
    actual or reasonably foreseeable environment.
    (4) (a) No pregnancy of a woman, who has not attained the age
    of eighteen years, or, who having attained the age of eighteen
    years, is a mentally ill person, shall be terminated except with
    the consent in writing of her guardian.

    (b) Save as otherwise provided in clause (a), no pregnancy
    shall be terminated except with the consent of the pregnant
    woman.”

    7. Hon’ble the Supreme Court in the matter of X Vs. Union of India &

    others [(2016) 14 SCC 382] has clearly held that termination of

    pregnancy after 20 weeks to save life of pregnant woman (an alleged

    rape victim) in case of grave danger to physical and mental health of

    the said woman, is permissible, and observed as under :-

    “13. Having perused the medical report (relevant extracts
    whereof have been reproduced herein above), we are satisfied
    that a clear finding has been recorded by the Medical Board, that
    the risk to the petitioner of continuation of her pregnancy can
    gravely endanger her physical and mental health. The Medical
    Board has also expressed an advice that the patient should not
    continue with the pregnancy. In view of the findings recorded in
    Para 6 of the report, coupled with the recommendation and
    advice tendered by the Medical Board, we are satisfied that it is
    permissible to allow the petitioner to terminate her pregnancy in
    terms of Section 5 of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act,
    1971. In view of the above, we grant liberty to the petitioner, if
    she is so advised, to terminate her pregnancy.

    8. Similar proposition has been laid down by Hon’ble the Supreme Court

    in the matter of X & others Vs. Union of India & others [(2017) 3 SCC

    458] and also in the matter of Meera Santosh Pal & others Vs. Union

    of India & others [(2017) 3 SCC 462].

    9. Further, Hon’ble the Supreme Court in the matter of Mrs. A Vs. Union

    of India and others [AIR 2017 SC 4037] has granted permission for

    termination of pregnancy of a woman, aged 22 years, in her 25 th to 26th

    weeks of pregnancy holding that continuation of pregnancy can pose

    severe mental injury to the petitioner and no additional risk to the

    petitioner’s life is involved if she is allowed to undergo termination of her
    Page 5 of 6

    pregnancy. Hon’ble the Supreme Court in paragraph 6 & 7 has held as

    under:-

    “6. Upon evaluation of the petitioner, the aforesaid Medical
    Board has concluded that her current pregnancy is of 25 to 26
    weeks. The condition of the foetus is not compatible with life.
    The medical evidence clearly suggests that there is no point in
    allowing the pregnancy to run its full course since the foetus
    would not be able to survive outside the uterus without a skull.

    7. Importantly, it is reported that the continuation of pregnancy
    can pose severe mental injury to the petitioner and no additional
    risk to the petitioner’s life is involved if she is allowed to undergo
    termination of her pregnancy.”

    10. The victim of rape must be given that much of liberty and right to decide

    whether she should continue with the pregnancy or she should be

    permitted to terminate the pregnancy. In the present case, it is quite

    vivid that the petitioner is carrying 14-16 weeks pregnancy and unless

    the judicial order directing termination is available, it may not be

    possible for the doctors even to proceed with termination of pregnancy.

    11. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the gestational

    age; and judicial precedents, the writ petition is allowed.

    12. The petitioner is directed to be admitted to the Government District

    Hospital Bilaspur/ Chhattisgarh Institute of Medical Science (CIMS)

    Bilaspur (with ICU facilities), today or in the early hours of tomorrow

    and thereafter, the authority concerned shall depute expert registered

    medical practitioners to cause termination of petitioner’s pregnancy by

    obtaining consent of the victim/ her parents.

    13. The authorities are also directed to preserve the DNA sample of the

    fetus for further reference as the criminal case against the accused is

    pending.

    14. A copy of this order be immediately transmitted to the Collector
    Page 6 of 6

    Bilaspur, Chief Medical & Health Officer, Bilaspur, Dean Chhattisgarh

    Institute of Medical Science (CIMS) Bilaspur, as also to the learned

    counsel appearing for the State for necessary compliance.

    Certified copy as per rules.

    Sd/-

    (Narendra Kumar Vyas)
    Judge

    Arun



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here