Dhiru Yadav @ Dhanukdhari Yadav @ Dhiraj … vs The State Of Bihar on 29 April, 2026

Patna High Court – Orders

Dhiru Yadav @ Dhanukdhari Yadav @ Dhiraj … vs The State Of Bihar on 29 April, 2026

Author: Sandeep Kumar

Bench: Sandeep Kumar

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18702 of 2026
                          Arising Out of PS. Case No.-88 Year-2011 Thana- AMAS District- Gaya
                 ======================================================
                 DHIRU YADAV @ DHANUKDHARI YADAV @ DHIRAJ YADAV @
                 DHANUSH DHEERAJ @ DHANUK S/O BANGALI YADAV R/o vill -
                 Bankat (Paharpur), P.S.- Amas in the Distt. of Gaya

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Sunil Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Ms.Gulnar Begum, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   29-04-2026

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

learned APP for the State.

SPONSORED

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Amas

P.S. Case No. 88 of 2011 registered for the offence under

Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 379, 384, 386, 435, 427

and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, under Section 27 of the

Arms Act, under Section 17 of the CLA Act and under Section

13 of the UAP Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and

others are said to have stopped the trucks near the Sao Kala Toll

Plaza and have set ablaze the trucks.

4. The petitioner is in custody since 26.05.2025.

5. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18702 of 2026(2) dt.29-04-2026
2/2

petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this

case because he is having 18 criminal antecedents of similar

nature.

6. Learned APP for the State submits that from the

records, it appears that the petitioner is an absconder in a case of

year 2011.

7. Considering the aforesaid facts, this Court is not

inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

8. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

(Sandeep Kumar, J)
tusharika/-

U       T