Jagat Ram And Others vs P. Mukherjee And Others on 20 April, 2026

    0
    29
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Jammu & Kashmir High Court

    Jagat Ram And Others vs P. Mukherjee And Others on 20 April, 2026

                                                                       Sr. Nos. 6, 7 & 8
    
         HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
                         AT JAMMU
    
                                                     CM No. 2130/2026 In
                                                     CM No. 2131/2026
                                                     CM No. 2132/2026
                                                     CPOWP No. 48/2009
    
    
    Jagat Ram and others                                            .....Petitioner(s)
    
                          Through: Mr. R. K. S. Thakur, Advocate
    
                     Vs
    
    P. Mukherjee and others                              ..... Respondent(s)
                        Through: Mr. Vishal Sharma, DSGI with
                                 Mr. Eishaan Dadhichi, CGSC
    
    Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHD. YOUSUF WANI, JUDGE
    
                                         ORDER
    

    20.04.2026

    1. Mr. Vishal Sharma, learned DSGI, appears and accepts notice in all the

    SPONSORED

    matters for the respondents.

    2. Through the medium of the instant miscellaneous applications bearing

    CM Nos. 2130/2026 and CM No. 2132/2026, the applicants namely, 1)

    Tilak Raj aged 82 years S/o Late Sh. Ram Chand R/o Village Gordhi A/P

    H. No. 131, Panjtirthi, Jammu, 2) Smt. Krishan Devi aged 86 years W/o

    Late Sh. Om Parkash R/o village Gordhi A/P H. No. 131, Panjtirthi,

    Jammu, 3) Sh. Nikhilesh Sharma aged 32 years S/o Late Sh. Sunil Sharma

    R/o Village Gordhi A/P H. No. 132, Panjtirthi, Jammu, 4) Smt. Surju Devi

    aged 75 years W/o Late Sh. Dewan Chand R/o Village Gordhi A/P

    Kashirah Tehsil & District Udhampur, 5) Sh. Sathish Kumar aged 52

    years W/o Late Sh. Dewan Chand R/o Village Gordhi A/P Kashirah Tehsil
    2 CM No. 2130/2026
    [

    & District Udhampur, 6) Sh. Ranjeet Kumar aged 47 years S/O late Sh.

    Late Sh. Dewan Chand R/o Village Gordhi A/P Kashirah Tehsil & District

    Udhampur, seek the release of the compensation amounts to the extent of

    their respective shares as per the apportionment/acquaintance rolls which

    stands already deposited by the respondents with the Registry of this Court

    as mentioned in the order dated 20.04.2012, passed by this Court while

    disposing of contempt application No. 48/2009 arising out of the main

    petition OWP No. 543/2007. The said deposited amount is supposed to be

    lying with the Registry of this Court under fixed deposit as per the

    aforesaid order dated 20.04.2012.

    3. The grievance of the applicants/petitioners in the main petition bearing

    OWP No. 543/2007 titled “Jagat Ram & Ors vs. Union of India & Ors.

    who include the present applicants or their predecessors was that a big

    chunk of land measuring 1780 kanals and 9 marlas situated at Village

    Priyan Gordi Sunthan & Thill of Tehsil and District Udhampur was

    initially requisitioned under Defence of India Act, 1962 and subsequently

    deemed to be requisitioned under the Provisions of J&K RAIP, Act, 1968

    and rules 1969. That requisitional land was required for permanent use of

    defence purposes for which necessary demand was placed by the indenting

    department (Defence Estates) before the Deputy Commissioner Udhampur

    for obtaining necessary “No Objection” from the State Government for

    acquisition of the land. That the then State Government gave “No

    Objection” to the acquisition of the requisitioned land in the year 1988.

    That further action for completing the other requirements under the

    provisions of the aforesaid Act and Rule was to be taken by the Defence
    3 CM No. 2130/2026
    [

    Estates Department as well as by the Deputy Commissioner Udhampur.

    However, acquisition proceedings could not take up immediately which

    prompted the petitioners in the said petition to approach this Court for

    redressal of their grievance. The said petition OWP No.543/2007 came to

    be disposed of on the consensus of the learned counsel for the parties with

    the direction to the respondents Nos. 1 to 4 to proceed in the matter without

    any further delay and issue notification for acquisition of the land. The

    exercise was directed to be done within a period of four weeks’, with the

    direction to the respondent Nos. 5 and 6 to take necessary steps for release

    of the amount of compensation due to the petitioners under the provisions

    of the law within a further period of two months.

    4. The acquisition proceedings are reported to be still under dispute through

    the medium of a separate petition before the High Court.

    5. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the present applicants/petitioners

    that this Court vide order dated 20.04.2012 passed in the CPOWP

    No. 48/2009 has given the liberty to the land owners to move motions for

    the release of the compensation amount to the extent of their respective

    shares that stands deposited in this Court as the agreed amount by the

    Union of India.

    6. It is submitted by the learned counsel that most of the land owners have

    already approached this Court with motions for release of the compensation

    amounts to the extent of their respective shares which have been released.

    7. The learned Deputy Solicitor General of India submitted that the

    appropriate orders may be passed in the matter.

    4 CM No. 2130/2026

    [

    8. Through the medium of the application bearing CM No.2131/2026, the

    applicants who happen to be the legal heirs of the deceased/ land owner/

    Sh. Krishan Chand seek the correction in the acquaintance

    roll/apportionment statement to the effect of assessing their respective

    shares out of the compensation that stands deposited as the share of Late.

    Sh. Krishan Chand.

    9. Perused all the three applications which are supported with affidavits. Also

    perused the record of the disposed of contempt petition bearing No.

    48/2009 as well as of earlier disposed of petition bearing OWP No.

    543/2007.

    10. Applications are allowed and the learned Registrar Judicial is directed to

    release the compensation amount in favour of the applicants in CM Nos.

    2130/2026 and 2132/2026 after proper verification to the extent of their

    shares as per the acquaintance roll/apportionment statement. In case any

    applicants/petitioners claim the compensation as the legal heirs of the

    deceased land owners his/their respective shares should be got verified by

    getting the acquaintance roll corrected from the office of the Deputy

    Commissioner, Udhampur. The compensation amount is directed to be

    released under rules and against proper acknowledgment, along with the

    proportionate share of interest.

    11. The applications are disposed of.

    (Mohd. Yousuf Wani)
    Judge
    Jammu
    20.04.2026
    Mahavir



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here