Sailendu Biswal @ vs State Of Odisha on 2 May, 2026

    0
    39
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Orissa High Court

    Sailendu Biswal @ vs State Of Odisha on 2 May, 2026

    Author: V. Narasingh

    Bench: V. Narasingh

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
    
                                 CRLA No. 1396 of 2025
    
                 1. Sailendu Biswal @
                    Silu
                 2. Jyotshna @ Jyotsna
                                               ....           Appellants
                    Mohapatra
                                             Mr. D. Sarangi, Advocate
    
                                        -versus-
    
                 State of Odisha               ....          Respondent
                                                    Mr. C.R. Swain, AGA
    
                                CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
    
                                       ORDER
    

    02.05.2026
    I.A. No.3381 of 2025
    Order No.

    16. 1. Heard.

    SPONSORED

    2. This is an application for stay realization of fine.

    3. Considering the submissions made and the
    recitals in the I.A, it is directed that the realization of
    fine imposed by the learned Additional District and
    Sessions Judge, Bhubaneswar in C.T. Case No.126 of
    2020 shall remain stayed, till disposal of the Criminal
    Appeal.

    4. I.A. is accordingly disposed of.

    (V. Narasingh)
    Judge

    Page 1 of 4
    I.A. No.1172 of 2026
    Order No.

    17. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Appellants and
    learned counsel for the Respondents.

    2. This is an application U/s.389 of Cr.P.C.
    seeking stay of execution of sentence and bail in
    respect of Appellant No.1 (Sailendu Biswal @ Silu).

    3. The Appellant No.1 (Sailendu Biswal @ Silu) is
    cited as an accused in C.T. Case No.126 of 2020
    pending on the file of learned Additional District &
    Sessions Judge, Bhubaneswar, arising out of
    Bhubaneswar Mahila P.S. Case No.3 of 2020 for
    commission of the alleged offence under Sections
    498-A
    /323/294/354/307/506/34 of IPC read with
    Section 4 of DP Act.

    4. Appellant No.1, who faced trial for commission
    of aforementioned offences, was acquitted by the
    learned Trial Court of the charges
    294/307/506/406/34 of IPC and convicted under
    Sections 498-A/419/420/34 of IPC read with
    Section 4 of DP Act and sentenced to undergo R.I.
    for three years for committing offence U/s 498-A/34
    of IPC and to pay a fine of Rs.20,000/- each, in
    default of payment of fine amount to undergo further
    period of sentence of R.I. for six months and R.I. for
    three years for committing offence U/s 419/34 of IPC
    and to pay a fine of Rs.20,000/- each, in default of
    payment of fine amount to undergo further period of

    Page 2 of 4
    sentence of R.I. for six months and R.I. for seven
    years for committing offence U/s 420/34 of IPC and
    to pay a fine of Rs.30,000/- each, in default of
    payment of fine amount to undergo further period of
    sentence of R.I. for one year and R.I. for one year for
    committing offence U/s 4 of D.P. Act. The substantive
    sentences are directed to run concurrently.

    5. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the
    Appellants, Mr. Sarangi that during trial Appellant
    No.1 was on bail and this Court directed him to be
    released on interim bail on account of sad demise of
    his father and he has not misused the trust reposed
    in him while on bail before the Trial Court and has
    also surrendered in time.

    It is further submitted that the Petitioner is in
    custody for over a period of four months.

    6. It is stated that since there is a very bleak
    chance of early hearing of this appeal, considering
    the nature of allegations and the evidence on record
    and the offence for which the Appellant No.1 has
    been convicted being triable by Magistrate, he may
    be released on bail.

    7. It is his further submission since the Appellant
    No.1 has his home and hearth within the jurisdiction
    of the Court in seisin, there is no chance of his
    absconding.

    8. Learned counsel for the State opposes such
    prayer.

    Page 3 of 4

    9. Considering the rival submissions and taking
    into account the docket congestion of this Court, it is
    directed that the Appellant No. 1 (Sailendu Biswal @
    Silu) be released on bail on such terms and
    conditions as deemed just and proper by the learned
    Additional District & Sessions Judge, Bhubaneswar in
    C.T. Case No.126 of 2020 arising out of Bhubaneswar
    Mahila P.S. Case No.3 of 2020.

    10. The I.A. is accordingly disposed of.

    11. U.C.C. as per rules.

    (V. Narasingh)
    Judge

    I.A. No.3380 of 2025
    Order No.

    18. 1. In view of the order passed in I.A. No.1172 of
    2026, the present I.A. is disposed of as not pressed.

    (V. Narasingh)
    Judge

    CRLA No.1396 of 2025
    Order No.

    19. 1. List this matter on 11.11.2026.

    Signature Not Verified
    Digitally Signed

    Signed by: SANTOSHI LENKA (V. Narasingh)
    Reason: Authentication
    Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Judge
    Date: 02-May-2026 16:36:34
    Santoshi

    Page 4 of 4

    [ad_1]

    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here