Andhra Pradesh High Court – Amravati
Sri Donkada Mrutyunjaya Rao (Died) vs Cma_163_2020 & Batch on 8 April, 2026
APHC010208292020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3333]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
CIVIL MISCELLNEOUS APPEAL NOS:163, 226, 227, 217, 224,
246, 242, 240, 202, 249, 241, 203, 205, 229, 201, 250, 247, 248,
228, 225, 243 OF 2020 & 80, 88, 112, 32, 50, 6, 87 OF 2021.
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 163/2020
Between:
1. SRI DONKADA MRUTYUNJAYA RAO (DIED), SRI
DONKADA MRUTYUNJAYA RAO (DIED)
2. SMT. D.PADMAVATHI,, W/O. LATE MRUTYUNJAYA RAO,
R/O. D.NO. 21-4-80, BOODI VEEDHI, RAMALAYAM,
VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT(S)
AND
1. SRI MAHARAJAH ALAK NARAYAN SOCIETY OF ARTS AND
SCIENCE MANSAS FORT, Vizianagaram District.
...RESPONDENT
Appeal Under Section_____against ordersappellant begs to
present this memorandum of civil miscellaneous appeal against the
judgment dated 23-12-2019, passed in O.A. No. 123 of 2007 on the
file of A.P. Endowments Tribunal Amaravathi at pedakakani
IA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay of all further
proceedings including eviction in pursuance of decree and order
dated 23-12-2019 in O.A.No. 123 of 2007, on the file of the A.P.
Endowment tribunal at amaravati at Pedakakani and pass.
Counsel for the Appellant(S):
1. VENKATESWARA RAO GUDAPATI
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. CHINTAPALLI SRINIVAS
2
VS,J
cma_163_2020 & batch
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 226/2020
Between:
1. SRI PANDA KAMESWARA RAO,, S/O. NITYANANDAM,
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/O KRISHNAPURAM, H/O
BODDAVALASA VILLAGE, DENKADA
MANDAL,VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT
AND
1. SRI MAHARAJAH ALAK NARAYAN SOCIETY OF ARTS AND
SCIENCE MANSAS, Fort, Vizianagaram Town 86 Dist.
...RESPONDENT
Appeal Under Section_____against ordersMemorandum of
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the Order and Decreedated
23.12.2019 passed in 0A.NO. 89 OF 2007, on the file of
A.P.Endowments Tribunal, Amaravathi, At Peddakakani
IA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with the filing of
the Certified Copy of the order/decree dated 23.12.2019, passed in
OA,NO. 89 OF 2007, on the file of the A.P.Endowments Tribunal,
Arnaravathi, At Peddakakaniin the above C.M.A. and pass
IA NO: 2 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further
proceedings including eviction in pursuance of decree and order
dated 23-12-2019 in O.A. No.89 of 2007, on the file of the A.P.
Endowment Tribunal at Amaravati at Pedakakaniand pass
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. G SAI NARAYANA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. CHINTAPALLI SRINIVAS
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 227/2020
Between:
1. SRI YERUKONDA RAMA RAO,, S/O LATE VISWAM RAJU,
AGED 92 YEARS, R/O KRISHNAPURAM, H/O
BODDAVALASA VILLAGE, DENKADA MANDAL,
VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
3
VS,J
cma_163_2020 & batch
...APPELLANT
AND
1. SRI MAHARAJAH ALAK NARAYAN SOCIETY OF ARTS AND
SCIENCE MANSAS, Fort, Vizianagaram Town and Dist.
...RESPONDENT
Appeal Under Section_____against ordersto present this
Memorandum of Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the Order and
Decreedated 23.12.201 9 passed inO.A.7.93/2007, on the file of
The A.P.Endowments Tribunal, Amaravathi, At Peddakakani
IA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with the filing of
the Certified Copy of the order/decree dated 23.12.2019, passed in
O.A.No.93/2007, on the file of the The A.P.Endowments Tribunal,
Amaravathi, At Peddakakani.in the above C.M.A. and pass
IA NO: 2 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further
proceedings including eviction in pursuance of decree and order
dated 23-12-2019 in O.A. No.93 of 2007, on the file of the A.P.
Endowment Tribunal at Amaravati at Pedakakaniand pass
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. G SAI NARAYANA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. CHINTAPALLI SRINIVAS
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 80/2021
Between:
1. SMT.KARRI LAKSHMI,, W/O KONDABABU, AGED ABOUT
61 YEARS, R/O KRISHNAPURAM, BODDAVALASA
VILLAGE, DENKADA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT
AND
1. SRI MAHARAJAH ALAK NARAYAN SOCIETY OF ARTS AND
SCIENCE MANASAS, Fort, Vizianagarm Town and District.
...RESPONDENT
Appeal Under Section_____against ordersMemorandum of
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the Order and Decreedated
4
VS,J
cma_163_2020 & batch
23.12.2019 passed inO.A.N0.83 OF 2007, on the file of A.P.
Endowment Tribunal, Amaravati, At Pedakakani
IA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with the filing of
the certified copy of the order/decree dated 23-12-2019 passed in
OA.No.83 of 2007 on the file of the AP Endowment Tribunal
Amaravati at pedakakani in the above CMA and pass
IA NO: 2 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further
proceedings including eviction in pursuance of decree and order
dated 23- 12-2019 in O.A.No.83/2007 , on the file of the A.P.
Endowment Tribunal, Amaravati, At Pedakakani,and pass
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. G SAI NARAYANA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. CHINTAPALLI SRINIVAS
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 88/2021
Between:
1. SRI YADLA TRINADHANAIDU,, SIO LATE NARASIMHULU,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O RIO BODDAVALASA (V),
DENKADA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT
...APPELLANT
AND
1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, , ENDOWMENTS
DEPARTMENT, VIZIANAGARAM.
2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, MANSAS TRUST, FORT,
VIZIANAGARAM.
3. SRI YADLA NARASIMHULU, (DIED)
...RESPONDENT(S):
Appeal Under Section_____against ordersto present this
Memorandum of Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the Order and
Decreedated 23.11.2012 passed in O.A.No.1726/2010 (Old
0.A.No.108/2007, Vizag D.C.), on the file of A.P.Endowments
Tribunal, Hyderabad (presently Amaravathi at Pedakakani)for the
following grounds among other
5
VS,J
cma_163_2020 & batch
IA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased
IA NO: 2 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further
proceedings including eviction in pursuance of decree and order
dated 23- 11-2012 in O.A.No.1726/2010 (Old O.A.No.108/2007
Vizag D.C.), on the file of the A.P. Endowment Tribunal at
Hyderabad,(presently at Amaravati, Pedakakani) and pass such
other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper
in the circumstances of the case
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. G SAI NARAYANA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. CHINTAPALLI SRINIVAS
2.
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 112/2021
Between:
1. MAJJI SATISH, S/O LATE MAJJI SURI BABU AGED ABOUT
35 YEARS R/O H/O BODDAVALASA (V) DENKADA MANDAL
VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT
2. MAJJI RAJESH, S/O MAJJI SURI BABU AGED ABOUT 32
YEARS R/O H/O BODDAVALASA (V) DENKADA MANDAL
VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT
...APPELLANT(S)
AND
1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS
DEPARTMENT VIIANAGARAM
2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, MANSAS TRUST FORT
VIZIANAGARAM
3. MAJJI SURI BABU, DIED
4. MAJJI SATYAVATHI, DIED
5. MAJJI SRINU, S/O LATE SURIBABU R/O H/O
BODDAVALASA (V) DENKADA MANDAL VIZIANAGARAM
DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S):
6
VS,J
cma_163_2020 & batch
Appeal Under Section_____against ordersBEG TO PRESENT
THIS MEMORANDUM OF CIVIL MISC APPEAL AGAINST THE
ORDER AND DECREE DATED 23.12.2012 PASSED IN O.A.
1709/2010 (OLD O.A. NO. 88/2007, VIZAG D.C.) ON THE FILE OF
A.P. ENDOWMENTS TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD (PRESENTLY
AMARAVATHI AT PEDAKAKANI)
IA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased TO DISPENSE WITH FILING OF
THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER/DECREE DATED
23.12.2012 PASSED IN O.A. NO. 1709/2010 OLD O A NO 88/2007
VIZAG D C ON THE FILE OF A P ENDOWMENTS TRIBUNAL
HYDERABAD PRESENTLY AMARAVATHI AT PEDAKAKANI
IA NO: 2 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased PLEASED TO GRANT STAY OF
ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS INCLUDING EVICTION IN
PURSUANCE OF DECREE AND ORDER DATED 3 12 2012
PASSED IN O A 1709/2010 OLD O A NO 88/2007 VIZAG D C ON
THE FILE OF A P ENDOWMENTS TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD
PRESENTLY AMARAVATHI AT PEDAKAKANI
Counsel for the Appellant(S):
1. G SAI NARAYANA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. K MADHAVA REDDY
2. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 217/2020
Between:
1. SMT.CHINNI KANAKA MAHALAKSHMI, W/O PRAKASA
RAO, R/O KRISHNAPURAM, H/O BODDAVALASA VILLAGE,
DENKADA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT
AND
1. SRI MAHARAJAH ALAK NARAYAN SOCIETY OF ARTS AND
SCIENCE MANSAS, Fort, Vizianagaram Town and Dist
...RESPONDENT
7
VS,J
cma_163_2020 & batch
Appeal Under Section_____against ordersto set aside order
and decree and order dated 23-12-2019 in O.A. No.68 of 2007, on
the file of the A.P. Endowment Tribunal at Amaravati at
Pedakakaniand pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the
Certified Copy of the order/decree dated 23.12.2019, passed in
O.A.No.68/2007, on the file of the The A.P.Endowments Tribunal,
Amaravathi, At Peddakakaniin the above C.M.A. and pass
IA NO: 2 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further
proceedings including eviction in pursuance of decree and order
dated 23-12-2019 in O.A. No.68 of 2007, on the file of the A.P.
Endowment Tribunal at Amaravati at Pedakakaniand pass
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. G SAI NARAYANA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. CHINTAPALLI SRINIVAS
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 224/2020
Between:
1. SRI CHINNI SURYA PRAKASA RAO,, S/O
SURYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/O
KRISHNAPURAM, H/O BODDAVALASA VILLAGE,
DENKADA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT
...APPELLANT
AND
1. SRI MAHARAJAH ALAK NARAYAN SOCIETY OF ARTS AND
SCIENCE MANSAS, Fort, Vizianagaram Town and Dist
...RESPONDENT
Appeal Under Section_____against ordersto set-aside order
and decree dated 23-12-2019 in O.A. No.80 of 2007, on the file of
the A.P. Endowment Tribunal at Amaravati at Pedakakaniand pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
8
VS,J
cma_163_2020 & batch
the High Court may be pleased to dispense with filing of the certified
copy of the order/decree dated 23.12.2019 passed in
O.A.No.80/2007 on the file of the AP Endowments Tribunal,
Amaravathi, at Peddakakani, in the above C.M.A. and pass
IA NO: 2 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further
proceedings including eviction in pursuance of decree and order
dated 23-12-2019 in O.A. No.80 of 2007, on the file of the A.P.
Endowment Tribunal at Amaravati at Pedakakaniand pass
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. G SAI NARAYANA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. CHINTAPALLI SRINIVAS
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 32/2021
Between:
1. THOTA RAMARAJYAM,, W/O APPA RAO, AGED ABOUT 60
YEARS, R/O KRISHNAPURAM, H/O BODDAVALASA
VILLAGE, DENKADA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT
AND
1. SRI MAHARAJAH ALAK NARAYAN SOCIETY OF ARTS AND
SCIENCE MANASAS, FORT, VIZIANAGARM TOWN AND
DISTRICT.
2. SMT ARAILA RAJYA LAKSHMI, W/O UMAMAHESWARA
RAO, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O KRISHNAPURAM, H/O
BODDAVALASA VILLAGE, DENKADA MANDAL,
VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ( RESPONDENT NO.2 IS NOT
NECESSARY PARTY )
...RESPONDENT(S):
Appeal Under Section_____against ordersMemorandum of
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the Order and Decreedated
23.12.2019 passed inO.A.No.90 of 2007, on the file of
A.P.Endowments Tribunal, Amaravathi at Pedakakani
IA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased Pleased to dispense with the filing of
9
VS,J
cma_163_2020 & batch
the certified copy of the order and decree dt 23-12-2019 in
OA.No.90/2007 on the file of the AP Endowment Tribunal,
Amaravati at Pedakakani and to pass
IA NO: 2 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased Pleased to grant the appellant leave
to file the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the order and
decree dt 23-12-2019 in OA.No.90/2007 on the file of the AP
Endowment Tribunal Amaravathi at pedakakani and to pass
IA NO: 3 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further
proceedings including eviction in pursuance of decree and order
dated 23- 12-2019 in Q.A. No.90 of 2007, on the file of the A.P.
Endowment Tribunal at Amaravati at Pedakakani and pass
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. G SAI NARAYANA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. CHINTAPALLI SRINIVAS
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 246/2020
Between:
1. P.RAMA RAO,, S/O POLAKI APPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 67
YEARS, R/O KRISHNAPURAM, H/O BODDAVALASA
VILLAGE, DENKADA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT
AND
1. MAHARAJAH ALAK NARAYAN SOCIETY OF ARTS AND
SCIENCE MANSAS, Fort, Vizianagaram Town and District.
...RESPONDENT
Appeal Under Section_____against ordersAppellant begs to
present this Memorandum of Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the
Order and Decreedated 23-12-2011passed inO.A.No.11 of 2007, on
the file of The A.P.Endowments Tribunal, Amaravathii at
Pedakakani
IA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
10
VS,J
cma_163_2020 & batch
the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with the filing of
the Certified Copy of the order/decree dated 23- 12-2019, passed in
0.A.No.117 of 2007, on the file of the The A.P.Enclowments
Tribunal, Amaravathi at Pedakalcaniin the above C.M.A. and pass
IA NO: 2 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further
proceedings including eviction in pursuance of decree and order
dated 23-12-2019 in O.A. No.117 of 2007, on the file of the A.P.
Endowment Tribunal at Amaravati at Pedakakaniand pass
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. G SAI NARAYANA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. CHINTAPALLI SRINIVAS
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 242/2020
Between:
1. SMT.IMANDI LAKSHMI KUMARI, W/O SRINIVASA RAO,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O KRISHNAPURAM, H/O
BODDAVALASA VILLAGE, DENKADA MANDAL,
VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT
AND
1. SRI MAHA ALAK NARAY SOCI OF ARTS AND SCIENCE,
Fort, Vizianagaram Town and District.
...RESPONDENT
Appeal Under Section_____against ordersto decree and order
dated 23-12-2019 in O.A. No.79 of 2007, on the file of the A.P.
Endowment Tribunal at Amaravati at Pedakakani and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased to dispense with filing of the
Certified Copy of the order/decree dated 23-12-2019 in O.A. No.79
of 2007, on the file of the A.P. Endowment Tribunal at Amaravati at
Pedakakani and pass
IA NO: 2 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
11
VS,J
cma_163_2020 & batch
the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further
proceedings including eviction in pursuance of decree and order
dated 23-12-2019 in O.A. No.79 of 2007, on the file of the A.P.
Endowment Tribunal at Amaravati at Pedakakani and pass
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. G SAI NARAYANA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. CHINTAPALLI SRINIVAS
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 240/2020
Between:
1. MARIGARLA JAYALAKSHMI, W/O SATYANARAYANA,
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O KRISHNAPURAM, H/O
BODDAVALASA VILLAGE, DENKADA
MANDAL,VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT
AND
1. SRI MAHARAJAH ALAK NARAYAN SOCIETY OF ARTS AND
SCIENCE MANSAS, Fort, Vizianagaram Town and Dist.
...RESPONDENT
Appeal Under Section_____against ordersto decree and order
dated 23-12-2019 in O.A. No.121 of 2007, on the file of the A.P.
Endowment Tribunal at Amaravati at Pedakakaniand pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased To dispense with the filing of the
certified copy of the decree and order dated 23-12-2019 in O.A.
No.121 of 2007, on the file of the A.P. Endowment Tribunal at
Amaravati at Pedakakaniand pass
IA NO: 2 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further
proceedings including eviction in pursuance of decree and order
dated 23-12-2019 in O.A. No.121 of 2007, on the file of the A.P.
Endowment Tribunal at Amaravati at Pedakakaniand pass
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. G SAI NARAYANA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent:
12
VS,J
cma_163_2020 & batch
1. CHINTAPALLI SRINIVAS
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 202/2020
Between:
1. SMT DOLA NEELAVENI,, D/O V.KANAKA RAJU, R/O
KRISHNAPURAM, H/O BODDAVALASA VILLAGE,
DENKADA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT
AND
1. SRI MAHARAJAH ALAK NARAYAN SOCIETY OF ARTS AND
SCIENCE, (MANSAS), Fort, Vizianagaram Town and Dist.
...RESPONDENT
Appeal Under Section_____against ordersAppellant begs to
present this Memorandum of Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the
Order and Decree dated 23.12.2019 passed in OA.NO. 72 OF 2007,
on the file of A.P.Endowments Tribunal, Amaravathi, At
Peddakakani for the following grounds among other
IA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with the filing of
the Certified Copy of the order/decree dated 23.12.2019, passed in
OA.NO. 72 OF 2007, on the file of the A.P.Endowments Tribunal,
Amaravathi, At Peddakakaniin the above C.M.A. and pass
IA NO: 2 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further
proceedings including eviction in pursuance of decree and order
dated 23- 12-2019 in O.A. No.72 of 2007, on the file of the A.P.
Endowment Tribunal at Amaravati at Pedakakani and pass
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. G SAI NARAYANA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. CHINTAPALLI SRINIVAS
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 249/2020
Between:
1. KONKI KRISHNA MURTHY, S/O KONKI SAHEB, AGED
ABOUT 80 YEARS, R/O KRISHNAPURAM, H/O
BODDAVALASA VILLAGE, DENKADA MANDAL,
13
VS,J
cma_163_2020 & batch
VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT
AND
1. MAHARAJAH ALAK NARAYAN SOCIETY, Maharajah Alak
Narayan Society of Arts and Science (MANSAS), Fort,
Vizianagaram Town and District.
...RESPONDENT
Appeal Under Section_____against ordersto decree and order
dated 23-12-2019 in O.A. No.94 of 2007, on the file of the A.P.
Endowment Tribunal at Amaravati at Pedakakani and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased to dispense with filing of the
Certified Copy of the order/decree dated 23-12-2019 passed in
O.A.No.94 of 2007, on the file of the A.P.Endowments Tribunal,
Amaravathi at Pedakakani in the above C.M.A. and pass
IA NO: 2 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further
proceedings including eviction in pursuance of decree and order
dated 23-12-2019 in O.A. No.94 of 2007, on the file of the A.P.
Endowment Tribunal at Amaravati at Pedakakaniand pass
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. G SAI NARAYANA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. CHINTAPALLI SRINIVAS
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 241/2020
Between:
1. SRI MANDAPALLI SADANANDHAM, S/O VEERANNA, AGED
ABOUT 58 YEARS R/O KRISHNAPURAM, H/O
BODDAVALASA VILLAGE, DENKADA MANDAL,
VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT
AND
1. SRI MAHARAJAH ALAK NARAYAN SOCIETY OF ARTS AND
SCIENCE MANSAS, Fort, Vizianagaram Town and Dist.
...RESPONDENT
14
VS,J
cma_163_2020 & batch
Appeal Under Section_____against ordersto decree and order
dated 23-12-2019 in O.A. No.112 of 2007, on the file of the A.P.
Endowment Tribunal at Amaravati at Pedakakaniand pass such
other order or orders
IA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the
Certified Copy of the order/decree dated 23-12-2019 in O.A. No.112
of 2007, on the file of the A.P. Endowment Tribunal at Amaravati at
Pedakakani and pass
IA NO: 2 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further
proceedings including eviction in pursuance of decree and order
dated 23-12-2019 in O.A. No.112 of 2007, on the file of the A.P.
Endowment Tribunal at Amaravati at Pedakakani and pass
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. G SAI NARAYANA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. CHINTAPALLI SRINIVAS
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 203/2020
Between:
1. SRI KUPPILI RADHA KRISHNA MURTHY,, S/O VENKATA
RAMANA MURTHY, R/O VISWA BHARATI VIDYA MANDIR,
KRISHNAPURAM, BODDAVALASA VILLAGE, DENKADA
MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT
AND
1. MAHARAJAH ALAK NARAYAN SOCIETY, Sri Maharajah Alak
Narayan Society of Arts and Science (MANASAS), Fort,
Vizianagarm Town and District
...RESPONDENT
Appeal Under Section_____against ordersto present this
Memorandum of Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the Order and
Decreedated 23.12.019 passed inO.A.No.97/007, on the file of The
A.P.Endowments Tribunal, Amaravathi At Peddakakani
IA NO: 1 OF 2020
15
VS,J
cma_163_2020 & batch
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with the filing of
the Certified Copy of the order/decree dated 23.12.2019, passed in
0.A.No.97/2007, on the file of the The A.P.Endowments Tribunal,
Amaravathi At Peddakakani in the above C.M.A. and pass
IA NO: 2 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further
proceedings including eviction in pursuance of decree and order
dated 23- 12-2019 in O.A. No.97 of 2007, on the file of the A.P.
Endowment Tribunal at Amaravati at Pedakakani and pass
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. G SAI NARAYANA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. CHINTAPALLI SRINIVAS
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 205/2020
Between:
1. SHAIK DARGA, S/O SHAIK APPA SAHEB, (SMT.SHAIK
DURGA MASTAN, W/O APPA RAO SAHEB AS PER THE
CAUSETITLE IN OA), RIO KRISHNAPURAM, H/O
BODDAVALASA VILLAGE, DENKADA MANDAL,
VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT
AND
1. SRI MAHARAJAH ALAK NARAYAN SOCIETY OF ARTS AND
SCIENCE MANSAS, Fort, Vizianagaram Town and Dist.
...RESPONDENT
Appeal Under Section_____against ordersMemorandum of
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the Order and Decreedated
23.12.2019 passed in O.A.No.111/2007, on the file of The
A.P.Endowments Tribunal, Amaravathi, At Peddakakani
IA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with the filing of
the Certified Copy of the order/decree dated 23.12.2019, passed in
16
VS,J
cma_163_2020 & batch
O.A.No.111/2007, on the file of the The A.P.Endowments Tribunal,
Amaravathi, At Peddakakani in the above C.M.A. and pass
IA NO: 2 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further
proceedings including eviction in pursuance of decree and order
dated 23- 12-2019 in O.A. No.111 of 2007, on the file of the A.P.
Endowment Tribunal at Amaravati at Pedakakani and pass
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. G SAI NARAYANA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. CHINTAPALLI SRINIVAS
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 229/2020
Between:
1. SMT TIRUGOTI GANGAVATI,, W/O GANI RAJU, AGED
ABOUT 74 YEARS, R/O KRISHNAPURAM, H/O
BODDAVALASA VILLAGE, DENKADA
MANDAL,VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT
AND
1. SRI MAHARAJAH ALAK NARAYAN SOCIETY OF ARTS AND
SCIENCE MANSAS, Fort, Vizianagaram Town and Dist.
...RESPONDENT
Appeal Under Section_____against ordersMemorandum of
civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the order and Decreedated 23-
12-2019 in O.A. No.113 of 2007, on the file of the A.P. Endowment
Tribunal at Amaravati at Pedakakaniand pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with the filing of
the certified copy of the order/decree dated 23-12-2019,passed in
O.A.No.113 of 2007,on the file of the A.P endowments Tribunal
Amaravathi,At Peddakakani the above C.M.A and pass
IA NO: 2 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased
17
VS,J
cma_163_2020 & batch
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. G SAI NARAYANA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. CHINTAPALLI SRINIVAS
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 201/2020
Between:
1. SRI SAILADA KRISHNA RAO,, S/O. GURUVULU, R/O
KRISHNAPURAM, H/O BODDAVALASA VILLAGE,
DENKADA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT
AND
1. SRI MAHARAJAH ALAK NARAYAN SOCIETY OF ARTS AND
SCIENCE MANSAS, Fort, Vizianagaram Town and Dist.
...RESPONDENT
Appeal Under Section_____against ordersMemorandum of
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the Order and Decree dated
23.12019 passed in O.A.No.115/2007, on the file of The
A.P.Endowments Tribunal, Amaravathi, At Peddakakani.
IA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with filing of the
Certified Copy of the order/decree dated 23.12.2019 passed in
0.A.No.115/2007, on the file of The A.P.Endowments Tribunal,
Amaravathi, At Peddakakani., in the above C.M.A. and pass
IA NO: 2 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further
proceedings including eviction in pursuance of decree and order
dated 23-12-2019 in O.A. No.115 of 2007, on the file of the A.P.
Endowment Tribunal at Amaravati at Pedakakani and pass
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. G SAI NARAYANA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. CHINTAPALLI SRINIVAS
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 250/2020
Between:
1. GUMIDALA RATNAM @VENKATA SUBBA RATNAM,, W/O
18
VS,J
cma_163_2020 & batch
PRAKASA RAO, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/O
KRISHNAPURAM, H/O BODDAVALASA VILLAGE,
DENKADA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT
AND
1. MAHARAJAH ALAK NARAYAN SOCIETY OF ARTS AND
SCIENCE MANSAS, Fort, Vizianagaram Town and District.
...RESPONDENT
Appeal Under Section_____against ordersto decree and order
dated 23-12-2019 in O.A. No.86 of 2007, on the file of the A.P.
Endowment Tribunal at Amaravati at Pedakakaniand pass such
other order or orders as this Honourable Court may deem fit and
proper in the circumstances of the case and in the interests of
justice.
IA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with the filing of
the Certified Copy of the order/decree dated 23- 12-2019, passed in
O.A.No.86 of 2007, on the file of the The A.P.Enclowments Tribunal,
Amaravathi at Pedakakaniin the above C.M.A. and pass
IA NO: 2 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further
proceedings including eviction in pursuance of decree and order
dated 23-12-2019 in OA.No.86/2007 on the file of the AP
Endowment tribunal at Amaravati at Pedakakani and pass
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. G SAI NARAYANA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. CHINTAPALLI SRINIVAS
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 247/2020
Between:
1. NALLAM LAKSHMI,, W/O MUDDU KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT
52 YEARS, RIO KRISHNAPURAM, H/O BODDAVALASA
VILLAGE, DENKADA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT
AND
19
VS,J
cma_163_2020 & batch
1. MAHARAJAH ALAK NARAYAN SOCIETY OF ARTS AND
SCIENCE MANSAS, Fort, Vizianagaram Town and District.
...RESPONDENT
Appeal Under Section_____against ordersTO decree and
order dated 23-12-2019 in O.A. No.71 of 2007, on the file of the A.P.
Endowment Tribunal at Amaravati at Pedakakaniand pass such
other order or orders as this Honourable Court may deem fit and
proper in the circumstances of the case and in the interests of
justice.
IA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with the filing of
the Certified Copy of the order/decree dated 23- 12-2019, passed in
0.A.No.71 of 2007, on the file of the The A.P.Endowments Tribunal,
Amaravathi at Pedakakaniin the above C.M.A. and pass
IA NO: 2 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further
proceedings including eviction in pursuance of decree and order
dated 23-12-2019 in O.A. No.71 of 2007, on the file of the A.P.
Endowment Tribunal at Amaravati at Pedakakaniand pass
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. G SAI NARAYANA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. CHINTAPALLI SRINIVAS
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 248/2020
Between:
1. KUNDETI MASTANAMMA, W/O SURYANARAYANA, AGED
ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/O KRISHNAPURAM, H/O
BODDAVALASA VILLAGE, DENKADA MANDAL,
VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT
AND
1. MAHARAJAH ALAK NARAYAN SOCIETY OF ARTS AND
SCIENCE MANSAS, FORT, VIZIANAGARAM TOWN AND
DISTRICT.
2. DEKU NAGAMANI, ( RESPONDENT 2 NOT NECCESARY
20
VS,J
cma_163_2020 & batch
PARTY TO THIS APPEAL).
...RESPONDENT(S):
Appeal Under Section_____against ordersto decree and order
dated 23-12-2019 in O.A. No.75 of 2007, on the file of the A.P.
Endowment Tribunal at Amaravati at Pedakakaniand pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased to dispense with filing of the certified
Copy of the order/decree dated 23-12-2019 passed in O.A.No.75 of
2007, on the file of the A.P.Endowments Tribunal, Amaravathi, at
Pedakakani, in the above C.M.Aa and pass
IA NO: 2 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further
proceedings including eviction in pursuance of decree and order
dated 23-12-2019 in O.A. No.75 of 2007, on the file of the A.P.
Endowment Tribunal at Amaravati at Pedakakani and pass
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. G SAI NARAYANA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. CHINTAPALLI SRINIVAS
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 50/2021
Between:
1. TIRUKOTI NARASIMHA MURTHY, S/O VENKANNA, AGED
ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O KRISHNAPURAM, H/O
BODDAVALASA VILLAGE, DENKADA MANDAL,
VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT
AND
1. THE ASST COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPT.,
VIZIANAGARAM,
2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, MANSAS TRUST, FORT,
VIZIANAGARM.
3. SMT P BANGARAMMA DIED, A
4. SMT ALAJANGI VARALAKSHMI, W/O BANGARAIAH, AGED
ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/O FLAT NO 304, ROYAL TOWERS,
SANTHI NAGAR, NAD POST, VISAKHAPATNAM. (
21
VS,J
cma_163_2020 & batch
RESPONDENTS 3 AND 4 ARE NOT NECESSARY PARTIES
)
...RESPONDENT(S):
Appeal Under Section_____against ordersMemorandum of
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the Order and Decreedated
23.11.2012 passed inO.A.No.1720 of 2010 (Old O.A.No.102/2007
Vizag D.C), on the file of AP.Endowments Tribunal Amaravathi at
Pedakakani
IA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant the appellant leave
to file the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the Order and
Decree dt.23-11-2012 in OA.No.1720/2010 (Old O.A.No.102/2007
Vizag D.C.) on the file of the AP Endowments Tribunal, at
Hyderabad an to pass
IA NO: 2 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with the filing of
the certified copy of the Order/decree dated 23-11-2012 passed in
O.A.No.1720 of 2010 (Old OA.No.102/2007 Vizag D.C) on the file of
the AP.Endowments Tribuanal Amaravathi at Pedakakani the above
CMA and pass
IA NO: 3 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further
proceedings including eviction in pursuance of decree and order
dated 23- 11-2012 in O.A.No.1720/2010 (Old O.A.No.102/2007
Vizag D.C.), on the file of the A.P. Endowment Tribunal at
Amaravati at Pedakakani and pass
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. G SAI NARAYANA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR ARBITRATION
2. CHINTAPALLI SRINIVAS
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 228/2020
Between:
22
VS,J
cma_163_2020 & batch
1. EMANDI APPALA RAJU, S/O SURYANARAYANA, AGE. 57,
EMANDI APPALA RAJU, S/O SURYANARAYANA, AGED
ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/O BODDAVALSA VILLAGE,
VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT
AND
1. SRI MAHARAJAH ALAK NARAYANA SOCIETY OF ARTS
AND SCIENCE MANSAD, ORT, VIZIANAGARAM TOWN
AND DIST.
2. SRI UPPALA APPA RAO, (DIED),
...RESPONDENT(S):
Appeal Under Section_____against ordersTo decree and order
dated 23-12-2019 in O.A. No.122 of 2007, on the file of the A.P.
Endowment Tribunal at Amaravati at Pedakakaniand pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased To dispense with the filing of the
certified copy of the order/decree dated 23-12-2019 in O.A. No.122
of 2007, on the file of the A.P. Endowment Tribunal at Amaravati at
Pedakakaniand the above CMA.
IA NO: 2 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further
proceedings including eviction in pursuance of decree and order
dated 23-12-2019 in O.A. No.122 of 2007, on the file of the A.P.
Endowment Tribunal at Amaravati at Pedakakaniand pass
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. G SAI NARAYANA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. CHINTAPALLI SRINIVAS
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 225/2020
Between:
1. K NAYIMI DIED, A
2. KADIMI NAGESWARA RAO,, S/O LATE CHITTIYYA, R/O
Q.NO.F/57, V A.P.S.P.QUATERS, CHITTIVALASA,
DENKADA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT(S)
23
VS,J
cma_163_2020 & batch
AND
1. SRI MAHARAJAH ALAK NARAYAN SOCIETY OF ARTS AND
SCIENCE MANSAS, FORT, VIZIANAGARAM TOWN AND
DIST.
2. KADIMI PRASANNA RATNAM, S/O NAGESWARA RAO,
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
3. KADIMI CHITTI BABU, S/O NAGESWARA RAO, AGED
ABOUT 42 YEARS,
4. KADIMI KISHORE KUMAR, S/O NAGESWARA RAO, AGED
ABOUT 40 YEARS. RESPONDENTS 2 TO 4 ARE NOT
NECESSARY PARTIES TO THIS APPEAL
...RESPONDENT(S):
Appeal Under Section_____against ordersto decree and order
dated 23-12-2019 in O.A. No.85 of 2007, on the file of the A.P.
Endowment Tribunal at Amaravati at Pedakakaniand pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased to dispense with xerox copy of the
order/decree dated 23.12.2019 passed in O.A.No.85/2007, on the
file of the A.P.Endowments Tribunal, Amaravathi, at Peddakakani,
in the above C.M.A. and pass
IA NO: 2 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further
proceedings including eviction in pursuance of decree and order
dated 23-12-2019 in O.A. No.85 of 2007, on the file of the A.P.
Endowment Tribunal at Amaravati at Pedakakaniand pass
Counsel for the Appellant(S):
1. G SAI NARAYANA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. CHINTAPALLI SRINIVAS
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 243/2020
Between:
1. SRI SAILADA SEETHARAM,, S/O GURUVULU, R/O
KRISHNAPURAMIAR BODDAVALASA VILLAGE, DENKADA
MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT
...APPELLANT
24
VS,J
cma_163_2020 & batch
AND
1. SRI MAHARAJAH ALAK NARAYAN SOCIETY OF ARTS AND
SCIENCE MANSAS, Fort, Vizianagaram Town and Dist.
...RESPONDENT
Appeal Under Section_____against ordersto present this
Memorandum of Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the Order and
Decreedated 23.12.2019 passed in O.A.No.114/2007, on the file of
The A.P.Endowments Tribunal, Amaravathi, At Peddakakani
IA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with the
Certified Copy of the order/decree dated 23.12.2019, passed in
0.A.No.114/2007, on the file of the The A.P.Endowments Tribunal,
Amaravathi, At PeddaCkani.in the above C.M.A. and pass
IA NO: 2 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further
proceedings' including eviction in pursuance of decree and order
dated 23-12-2019 in O.A. No.114 of 2007, on the file of the A.P.
Enwment Tribunal at Amaravati at Pedakakaniand pass
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. G SAI NARAYANA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. CHINTAPALLI SRINIVAS
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 6/2021
Between:
1. THE CORRESPONDENT,, BHAVANI EDUCATIONAL
SOCIETY R/O KRISHNAPURAM, H/O BODDAVALASA
VILLAGE, DENKADA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT
AND
1. SRI MAHARAJAH ALAK NARAYAN SOCIETY OF ARTS AND
SCIENCE MANSAS, Fort, Vizianagaram Town and Dist.
...RESPONDENT
Appeal Under Section_____against ordersAppellant begs to
present this Memorandum of Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the
Order and Decree dated 30.04.2019 passed in O.A. No. 128/2007,
25
VS,J
cma_163_2020 & batch
on the file of the AP Endowments Tribunal, amaravathi, at
Peddakakani
IA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with the
Certified Copy of the order/decree dated 30.04.2019, passed in
O.A.No.128/2007, on the file of the The A.P.Endowments Tribunal,
Amaravathi, At Peddakakani.in the above C.M.A. and pass
IA NO: 2 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further
proceedings including eviction in pursuance of decree and order
dated 30- 04-2019 in O.A. No.128 of 2007, on the file of the A.P.
Endowment Tribunal at Amaravati at Pedakakaniand pass
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. G SAI NARAYANA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. CHINTAPALLI SRINIVAS
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 87/2021
Between:
1. SMT.KORRAI LAKSHMI, W/O KONDABABU, AGED ABOUT
61 YEARS, R/O KRISHNAPURAM, BODDAVALASA
VILLAGE, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT
AND
1. SRI MAHARAJAH ALAK NARAYAN SOCIETY OF ARTS AND
SCIENCE MANASAS, FORT, VIZIANAGARM TOWN AND
DISTRICT.
2. SRI KORADA ESWARA RAO DIED, D
3. SMT K PADMA, W/O LATE K.ESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT
YEARS, R/O KRISHNAPURAM, BODDAVALASA VILLAGE,
VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Appeal Under Section_____against ordersbegs to present this
Memorandum of Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the Order and
Decreedated 23.12.2019 passed inO.A.No.101/2007, on the file of
A.P.Endowments Tribunal, Amaravathi, at Pedakakani.
26
VS,J
cma_163_2020 & batch
IA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased to grant the appellant leave to file
the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the Order and
Decree dt.23.12.2012 in OA.No.101/2007, on the file of the
A.P.Endowments Tribunal, Amaravathi, at Pedakakani in the above
C.M.A. and pass
IA NO: 2 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased to dispense with filing of the
Certified Copy of the order/decree dated 23.12.2019 passed in
O.A.No.101/2007, on the file of A.P.Endowments Tribunal,
Amaravathi, at Pedakakani, in the above C.M.A. and pass
IA NO: 3 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,
the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further
proceedings including eviction in pursuance of decree and order
dated 23-12-2019 in O.A.No.101/2007 , on the file of the A.P.
Endowment Tribunal,Amaravati At Pedakakani, and pass
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. G SAI NARAYANA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. CHINTAPALLI SRINIVAS
The Court made the following:
27
VS,J
cma_163_2020 & batch
COMMON JUDGMENT:
All these appeals have been filed by similarly situated persons
against whom, the A.P. Endowments Tribunal has passed individual
orders directing them to vacate and deliver vacant possession of the
petition scheduled property. In all these appeals, the appellants are
occupants/residents of various extents of land mentioned in the
respective petition schedule property and the respondent in all these
cases is a trust/temple which has initially filed an application before
the Tribunal seeking eviction of the appellants from the petition
schedule property. Hence, this Court feels it appropriate to decide
all these appeals by way of this common judgment, by narrating the
facts as in C.M.A.No.163 of 2020.
2) C.M.A.No.163 of 2020 is filed by the appellants/respondents
under Section 88 of the A.P. Charitable Religious Institutions and
Endowments Act, 1987 challenging the order dated 23.12.2019
passed in O.A.No.129 of 2007 by the Member, A.P. Endowments
Tribunal, Amaravathi at Pedakakani, whereby, the Tribunal allowed
the petition directing appellant No.2/respondent No.2 to vacate and
deliver vacant possession of the petition scheduled property.
3) For the sake of convenience, the parties to the appeal will
hereinafter be referred as petitioner and respondents, as arrayed
before the Tribunal in O.A.No.129 of 2007.
4) The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner trust is a
Public Charitable Institution published under Section 6 (a) (i) of the
Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and
28
VS,J
cma_163_2020 & batch
Endowments Act, 1987 (for short “Act 30 of 1987”). The provisions
of the above Act and Rules framed thereunder govern the
administration and management of the subject temple. The
petitioner trust is the absolute owner of the agricultural dry land to
an extent of Ac.1.36 cents in T.S.No.361/1B of Vizianagaram
District. All the revenue and endowments records clearly show that
the land belongs to the subject temple. The respondent is in
unauthorised occupation of the petition schedule land without any
approval of the competent authority sanctioning lease or license
whatsoever. The respondent has raised unauthorised constructions
with a malafide intention to grab the valuable land belonging to the
subject institution and he is not paying any amount to the institution
for his/her use and occupation. In spite of several demands made
by the petitioner, the respondent did not vacate the scheduled
property. Hence, the present O.A. has been filed by the petitioner
before the Deputy Commissioner, Endowments Department,
Visakhapatnam against the respondent under Section 83 (1) of the
Act 30 of 1987 seeking eviction of respondent No.2 from the petition
schedule property.
5) Respondent No.1 filed counter denying the material
averments and contended that his father is the absolute owner of
the property as per the settlement adangal and the revenue records
of Vizianagaram Mandal Revenue Office. The part of the property
was acquired by the Government after due enquiry by the land
acquisition officer-cum-Deputy Collector, VUDA, Visakhapatnam as
per the award dated 10.03.1986 in Award No.04/1986.
29
VS,J
cma_163_2020 & batch
Subsequently, the District Collector, Vizianagaram also issued a
notice dated 29.11.1990 for acquisition to the mother of the
respondent in respect of some more part of the property, in which
the petitioner is also a party, and the same is also reflected in the
Municipal Town Survey extract of Vizianagaram Municipality. The
respondent has been enjoying the same without any hindrance from
anybody and it is known to all the villagers including the petitioner.
Thus, the respondent and his predecessors have got right, title
interest and enjoyment for the last several decades. Further, the title
of a party cannot be decided in such summary procedure, more so,
when the Civil Courts got jurisdiction to decide the question of title,
as such the subject matter will not come under the purview of the
Tribunal and requested to dismiss the petition.
6) During pendency of the petition, respondent No.1 died and
respondent No.2 was added as legal representative of respondent
No.1.
7) Basing on the above pleadings, the Tribunal framed the
following issues:
1) Whether the 2nd respondent is an encroacher under
Section 83 of Act, 30 /1987 and is liable to be evicted?
2) To what result?
8) No oral or documentary was adduced by either party.
9) The Tribunal considering the facts as mentioned in the
petition filed by the petitioner held that respondent No.2 did not
30
VS,J
cma_163_2020 & batchadduce any evidence to prove his/her title though several
opportunities were given to prove his/her title over the subject
property, and answered issue No.1 holding that respondent would
fall within the definition of encroacher under Section 83 of the Act 30
of 1987 and liable to be evicted and directed respondent No.2 to
vacate and deliver vacant possession of the petition scheduled
property to the petitioner institution.
10) Aggrieved by the said order, the present appeal has been
preferred by the respondents on the ground that the Tribunal erred
in granting decree without any evidence, either oral or documentary,
however, Tribunal having referred to the documents filed by the
respondents along with the counter affidavit, failed to appreciate
them.
11) When the matter listed for admission, on 11.08.2020 this
Court passed the following interim order in I.A.No.1 of 2020.
“Heard.
Status quo as on today shall be maintained by both the parties.”
12) Learned counsel for the appellants contended that the
Tribunal having discussed with regard to the documents filed by the
respondent herein, has not discussed about documents filed by the
appellants along with the counter before the Tribunal. Further, the
Tribunal though appointed the Advocate-Commissioner for
recording the evidence, no evidence was filed in the court and the
warrant was not returned, and in such a case, the Tribunal ought to
have dismissed the petition filed by the respondent. Further, the
31
VS,J
cma_163_2020 & batch
Tribunal has no power to decide the title dispute and requested to
allow the appeal.
13) Learned counsel for the respondent contended that appellant
No.2 would fall within the definition of encroachers under Section 83
of Act 30 of 1987, therefore, the Tribunal rightly ordered for eviction
of appellant and supported the order of the Court below in all
respects, requested this Court to dismiss the present appeal.
14) It is the case of the petitioner institution that the scheduled
property belongs to the petitioner Trust. However, respondent No.1
claims that his father is the absolute owner of the property as can be
seen from the settlement Adangal and the Revenue Records.
Admittedly, petitioner filed T.S.R. extract, however, the same was
not marked. Respondents filed 12 documents, but they were not
marked.
15) Generally speaking, it is for the petitioner, who approached
the Tribunal, to prove their case by adducing proper evidence.
Admittedly, in the present case, no such oral or documentary
evidence has been adduced by the petitioner – institution to
substantiate their case. On the other hand, it appears from the
record, there is a dispute with regard to the title between the parties,
which has to be proved by producing oral and documentary
evidence and the same will be decided after full-fledged trial
conducted by a competent Civil Court, but not by the endowments
tribunal in a summary proceedings.
32
VS,J
cma_163_2020 & batch
16) Learned counsel for the appellant relied on the judgment of
this Court in “Nathani Ravindrudu Vs. Assistant Commissioner,
Endowments Department, Ongole, Prakasam District1” in
support his contentions, wherein this Court discussed about the
power of Endowments Tribunal to decide certain disputes as per
Section 87 of the Act 30 of 1987, which is as follows:
“Section 87(1) The Endowments Tribunal having
jurisdiction shall have the power, after giving notice in the
prescribed manner to the person concerned, to enquire into and
decide any dispute as to the question-
(a) Whether an institution or endowment is a charitable
institution or endowment;
(b) Whether an institution or endowment is a religious
institution or endowment;
(c) Whether any property is an endowment, if so whether it
is a charitable endowment or religious endowment;
(d) Whether any property is a specific endowment;
(e) Whether any person is entitled by custom or otherwise
to any honour, emoluments or perquisites in any charitable or
religious institution or endowment and what the established usage
of such institution or endowment is in regard to any other matter;
(f) Whether any institution or endowment is wholly partly of
a secular or religious character and whether any property is given
wholly or partly for secular or religious uses; or1
2024 (3) ALD 662 (AP)
33
VS,J
cma_163_2020 & batch
(g) Where any property or money has been given for the
support of an institution or endowment which is partly of a secular
character and partly of a religious character or the performance of
any service or charity connected with such institution or
endowment or the performance of a charity which is partly of a
secular character and partly of a religious character or where any
property or money given is appropriated partly to secular uses
and partly to religious uses, as to what portion of such property of
money shall be allocated to secular or religious uses;
(h) Whether a person is a founder or a member from the
family of the founder of an Institution or Endowment.”
17) Adverting to the above provision, in the above referred
judgment, this Court directed the parties therein to approach the
competent civil Court as the dispute with regard to title cannot be
decided by the Tribunal.
18) Learned counsel for the respondent relied on the judgment of
the Full Bench of High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in
“Vinjamuri Rajagopala Chary Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh2“,
wherein the Court dealt with the prohibitory properties list notified
under Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908 and held that the
prohibitory properties notified under Section 22-A of the Registration
Act cannot be registered by the Registrar and Sub-Registrars, and
the parties aggrieved by inclusion of their properties in such list may
apply for their deletion from the list or for modification thereof to the
concerned authorities as provided for in the guidelines who shall
pass appropriate orders within six weeks and communicate the
2
2016 (2) ALD 236 (FB)
34
VS,J
cma_163_2020 & batch
same to the concerned party. Apart from redressal mechanism,
aggrieved person can also approach the appropriate forum including
Civil Court for deletion of his property / land from the list of
prohibited properties or for any appropriate relief.
19) The law laid down in the said judgment is not in dispute, but
the same is not applicable to the present facts of the case as the
petitioner institution has not pleaded in the petition that the petition
schedule property is a prohibitory property notified under
Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908.
20) Admittedly, in the present case, in the absence of any
evidence adduced by the respondent/petitioner, the Tribunal passed
the impugned eviction order as against the appellants/respondents.
Under similar circumstances, in “Union of India (UOI) and Ors. Vs.
Vasavi Co-op. Housing Society Ltd. and Ors.3” the Apex Court
held that in a suit for declaration of title, the burden always lies on
the plaintiff to make out and establish a clear case for granting such
a declaration and the weakness, if any, of the case set up by the
defendants would not be a ground to grant relief to the plaintiff. The
Hon’ble Apex Court further held that the plaintiff in a suit for
declaration of title and possession could succeed only on the
strength of its own title and that could be done only by adducing
sufficient evidence to discharge the onus on it, irrespective of the
question whether the defendants have proved their case or not.
3
(2014) 2 SCC 269
35
VS,J
cma_163_2020 & batch
21) Relying on the said judgment, the Division Bench of this Court
in “Matam Ashok Kumar Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented
by its District Collector, Kurnool (First Appeal No.609 of 2011)”,
dismissed the appeal preferred against the Endowments
Department, holding that in a suit for declaration of title, the burden
of proof is always on plaintiffs to prove the title by adducing cogent
evidence to the satisfaction of the Court and that mere mutation in
revenue records does not confer any title nor is a proof of title.
22) In the present case, the petitioner institution is claiming right
over the petition schedule property basing on revenue records such
as T.S.R extract and the respondents are claiming right over the
same property basing on the copy of settlement adangal issued by
M.R.O., Vizianagaram, copy of notice of award under Section 12 (2)
of the Act 30 of 1987 etc., It appears from the material available on
record, there is a title dispute between the parties. Title dispute is a
mixed question of fact and law, which can be decided by the
competent Civil Court after full-fledged trial, but the Tribunal cannot
decide the title of the property in a summary proceedings.
Therefore, the present appeal deserves to be allowed.
23) In view of the above discussion made in C.M.A.No.163 of
2020, all these appeals deserve to be allowed.
24) Accordingly, all the Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are allowed
setting aside the respective impugned orders passed by the
Member, A.P. Endowments Tribunal, however, the respondent
36
VS,J
cma_163_2020 & batch
institutions are at liberty to approach the competent Civil Court, if at
all they have any grievance regarding title. No costs.
25) Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending if any,
shall also stand closed.
______________________
JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
08.04.2026
Ksp/GSS