Rajiv Kumar @ Rajiv Kumar Rai vs The State Of Bihar on 27 April, 2026

    0
    34
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Patna High Court

    Rajiv Kumar @ Rajiv Kumar Rai vs The State Of Bihar on 27 April, 2026

    Author: Mohit Kumar Shah

    Bench: Mohit Kumar Shah, Arun Kumar Jha

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                       Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20431 of 2025
         ======================================================
         Rajiv Kumar @ Rajiv Kumar Rai Son of Vashishth Ray, Resident of Village-
         Nihasa, P.O. Dumhar Patti, P.S. Pupri, District- Sitamarhi.
    
                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                           Versus
    1.   The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.
    2.   The Additional Chief Secretary, Prohibition, Excise and Registration
         Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
    3.   The Excise Commissioner, Prohibition, Excise and Registration Department,
         Government of Bihar, Patna.
    4.   The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Darbhanga, District- Darbhanga.
    5.   The Assistant Excise Commissioner, Darbhanga, District- Darbhanga.
    6.   The Superintendent of Police, Darbhanga, District- Darbhanga.
    7.   The Station Head Officer, Simri Police Station, District- Darbhanga.
    
                                                   ... ... Respondent/s
         ======================================================
         Appearance :
         For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr.Pushpendra Kumar Singh, Advocate
         For the Respondent/s   :      Mr.Standing Counsel (04)
         ======================================================
           CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
                                       and
                    HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                             ORAL JUDGMENT

    (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH)

    Date : 27-04-2026

    SPONSORED

    The present writ petition has been filed for directing

    the respondent authorities to release the sum of Rs.5,38,000/-,

    which has been seized in connection with Simri P.S. Case No.

    295 of 2021 dated 17.10.2021, registered under Section 420,

    414, 468 and 120(b) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a),

    41(i), 41(ii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016(as

    amended up to date) (hereinafter referred to as the “Act, 2016”),
    Patna High Court CWJC No.20431 of 2025 dt.27-04-2026
    2/6

    against the petitioner and five other accused persons.

    02. The brief facts of the case according to the

    informant of the present case i.e., the Sub-Inspector of Police,

    Simri Police Station, Darbhanga is that on 16.10.2021 at about

    22:00 hrs while the informant was posted at Simri Police

    Station, he along with other police personnel had left the police

    station on Government vehicle for patrolling and when they had

    reached NH-57, they saw one truck going from Shobhan to

    Muzaffarpur and upon seeing the police vehicle, the driver of

    the truck had tried to turn the truck and flee away, however the

    truck was intercepted and the driver of the said truck was

    apprehended. Thereafter, one Mahindra TUV 300 vehicle

    bearing Registration No. BR07PB8445 had arrived near the

    truck but upon seeing the police party, the driver tried to turn the

    car and flee away. Nonetheless, police personnel had chased the

    said vehicle and with the help of the local police station, the said

    vehicle was intercepted and apprehended near Kamtol village

    and from the said vehicle one female and three male persons

    had got down and while they were trying to flee away, they were

    apprehended by the police. Upon enquiry, one of the persons

    had disclosed his name as Rajiv Kumar i.e., the petitioner

    herein. Thereafter, search was made and 1886.4 litre of illicit
    Patna High Court CWJC No.20431 of 2025 dt.27-04-2026
    3/6

    liquor was recovered from the truck while 81 litre of illicit

    liqour was recovered from the car apart from recovery of cash to

    the tune of Rs.5,38,000/- from the dashboard of the vehicle in

    question. On the basis of the said written information of the

    informant, Simri P.S. Case No. 295 of 2021 dated 17.10.2021

    was registered against the petitioner and others.

    03. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner

    has submitted that since the respondent authorities have seized

    the aforesaid sum of Rs.5,38,000/- in connection with Simri P.S.

    Case No. 295 of 2021, hence the petitioner may be permitted to

    approach the Collector, Darbhanga for release of the seized cash

    amount, in view of the stand taken by the respondents in the

    counter affidavit filed in the present case.

    04. Per contra, the learned counsel for the respondents

    has submitted that a counter affidavit has been filed in the

    present case, in response to the query put by this Court vide

    order dated 07.04.2026, relevant portion whereof is reproduced

    hereinbelow:-

    “3. We have gone through the provisions of
    Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 as
    amended up to date as also the Rules framed
    thereunder and we find that two pertinent
    issues have arisen, i.e.,

    (i) as to under what provision of law, the said
    sum of Rs.5,38,000/- has been seized and
    Patna High Court CWJC No.20431 of 2025 dt.27-04-2026
    4/6

    (ii) under what provision of law an
    application can be made for release of the
    said sum of Rs.5,38,000/-.”

    05. The learned counsel for the respondents has

    submitted by referring to paragraph no. 16, 17 & 19 of the

    counter affidavit filed in the present case that the “seized cash”

    clearly falls within the ambit of “any other item having bearing

    with the case”, as contemplated under Section 56(2)(iv) of the

    Act, 2016 and its seizure is fully authorized as also legally

    sustainable. It is further submitted that the Act, 2016 gives a

    complete statutory mechanism for adjudication, confiscation

    and release of seized properties, including cash, through the

    competent confiscating authority, namely the Collector or an

    officer authorized by him. Reference has been made to a

    judgment dated 19.03.2025 rendered by a Coordinate Bench of

    this Court in CWJC No. 1717 of 2025 (Pappu Rai Vs. The

    State of Bihar and Ors.), paragraph nos. 2 and 3 whereof are

    reproduced hereinbelow:-

    “2. Grievance of the petitioner is prima-facie
    premature in view of Section 56 of Bihar
    Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, which
    reads as under:-

    “56. Confiscation of Seized Items.-
    (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in
    Section 57B, whenever an offence punishable
    under this Act, is committed, the Collector or
    an officer authorized by him may confiscate
    Patna High Court CWJC No.20431 of 2025 dt.27-04-2026
    5/6

    such items based on the report of the
    investigating officer.

    (2) Such items may include –

    (i) any premises or part thereof;

    (ii) any animal, vehicle, vessel or
    conveyance;

    (iii) any liquor or intoxicant;

    (iv) any other item having bearing with the
    case; Provided, where things as mentioned in
    Section 57 are to be destroyed, then the
    Collector or an officer authorized by him
    need not confiscate the same before their
    destruction.

    (3) The State Government may issue
    necessary direction, guidelines, regulations
    and instructions with respect to the mode and
    manner of search, seizure, destruction and
    confiscation.” Underline supplied.

    3. Seizure of the petitioner’s case would fall
    under Section 56 (2) (iv), any other item
    having bearing with the case. Seizure of cash
    in the light of offences under the Excise Act is
    required to be investigated and examined
    whether seizure of such cash is relating to any
    transaction of illicit liquor or not? If the
    seizure of amount is not involved for the
    offences under Excise Act, in that event,
    petitioner is entitled to refund/release of
    seized amount. In this regard, liberty is
    granted to the petitioner to approach or
    invoke appropriate authority/forum at
    appropriate stage.”

    06. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties

    and perused the materials on record and we find that the law

    with regard to the issue under consideration is no longer res

    integra hence, we deem it fit and proper to grant liberty to the
    Patna High Court CWJC No.20431 of 2025 dt.27-04-2026
    6/6

    petitioner to file appropriate application for release of the seized

    cash amount before the learned Collector, Darbhanga and in

    case, such an application is filed within a period of four weeks

    from today, the learned Collector, Darbhanga shall consider the

    same in accordance with law and pass a reasoned and a

    speaking order within a period of four weeks, thereafter.

    07. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands

    disposed of on the aforesaid terms.

    (Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

    ( Arun Kumar Jha, J)
    Anuradha/-

    AFR/NAFR                AFR
    CAV DATE                N/A
    Uploading Date          30.04.2026
    Transmission Date       N/A
     



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here