Rohit Bhadana S/O Late Shri Dharambir … vs Indira Singhal W/O Shri Banwari Lal … on 24 April, 2026

    0
    43
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur

    Rohit Bhadana S/O Late Shri Dharambir … vs Indira Singhal W/O Shri Banwari Lal … on 24 April, 2026

    [2026:RJ-JP:17555]
    
             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                         BENCH AT JAIPUR
    
             S.B. Civil Misc. Arbitration Application No. 82/2024
    
    Rohit Bhadana S/o Late Shri Dharambir Bhadana, Deceased
    Partner Of M/s Balaji Minerals, Aged About 34 Years, R/o 169,
    Sector 15-A, Faridabad, Haryana.
                                                                         ----Petitioner
                                         Versus
    1.       Indira Singhal W/o Shri Banwari Lal Singhal, Aged About
             71 Years, R/o Sukh Bhawan, Civil Lines, Alwar, Rajasthan,
             Surviving Partner Of M/s Balaji Minerals, Sukh Bhawan,
             Civil Lines, Alwar, Rajasthan.
    2.       M/s Balaji Minerals, Through Its Sole Surviving Partner,
             Smt. Indira Singhal, Sukh Bhawan, Civil Lines, Alwar,
             Rajasthan.
                                                                      ----Respondents
    For Petitioner(s)          :     Mr. Pradeep Kumar
    For Respondent(s)          :     Mr. David Mehla
    
    
    
    

    HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA

    Order

    SPONSORED

    24/04/2026

    1. Heard.

    2. The dispute has arisen between the parties and the

    petitioner seek appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate the

    same. The partnership deed was executed between the father of

    the petitioner and the respondents. Father of the petitioner

    expired on 29.04.2021. Earlier the petitioner filed a civil suit,

    which was dismissed on 20.04.2022 on the basis that there is an

    arbitration clause and the civil suit would not lie. Thereafter, the

    application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,

    1996 (for short the ‘the Act of 1996’) was filed, wherein order has

    (Uploaded on 29/04/2026 at 07:59:18 AM)
    (Downloaded on 29/04/2026 at 11:04:40 PM)
    [2026:RJ-JP:17555] (2 of 2) [ARBAP-82/2024]

    been passed on 05.08.2025, whereby the application under

    Section 9 of the Act has been dismissed. Thus, it is clear that the

    petitioner wants to raise certain disputes before the Arbitrator with

    regard to the rendition of the accounts of the firm.

    3. This Court, with the consent of learned counsel for the

    parties, appoints Mr. Ayub Khan (Retd. District Judge), R/o-130,

    Sanjay Nagar-B, Jhotwara, Jaipur-302012 to act as Sole Arbitrator

    and to decide all issues without prejudice to the rights and

    contentions raised in the present application. The arbitration fees

    shall be determined in accordance with the Fourth Schedule of the

    Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the

    Act of 1996’), as amended. The fee of the Arbitrator will be

    equally borne by both the parties. The place of arbitration shall be

    at Jaipur.

    4. The Arbitrator is requested to complete the proceedings as

    per time limit specified under Section 29A of the Act of 1996.

    5. The arbitration application is allowed accordingly.

    6. Copy of this order be sent to the appointed Sole Arbitrator.

    (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),ACTING CJ

    SANJAY KUMAWAT/RAJAT/37

    (Uploaded on 29/04/2026 at 07:59:18 AM)
    (Downloaded on 29/04/2026 at 11:04:40 PM)

    Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here