Jammu & Kashmir High Court
Abdul Razzaq vs Union Of India Through on 28 April, 2026
Author: Rajnesh Oswal
Bench: Rajnesh Oswal
Sr. No. 01
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
Bail App No. 14/2026
Abdul Razzaq, .... Petitioner(s)
Age 267 years,
S/o Bashir Ahmed.
R/o Rakh Sarkar, Hiranagar,
Kathua.
Through:- Mr. M. A. Bhat, Advocate.
V/s
Union of India through .....Respondent(s)
Intelligence Officer, Narcotic
Control Bureau, Jammu.
Through:- Mr. Vishal Sharma, DSGI with
Mr. Sumant Sudan, Advocate.
Mr. Karan Sharma, Advocate.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER
28.04.2026
1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
2. Sub-inspector, Babu Ram is present in person. He has produced the
case diary, a perusal whereof reveals that a complaint for commission of
offences punishable under Sections 8, 21, 25, 27A, 29 and 60 of the
NDPS Act stands filed against Abdul Razzaq, Gafoor Ali and Juman Din.
Abdul Razzaq is the petitioner in this Bail application.
3. Though the quantity of the contraband allegedly recovered from the
accused persons falls within the category of intermediate quantity but
taking into consideration that Section 27A of NDPS Act has been imposed
and learned Additional Sessions Judge, Samba, (hereinafter to be referred
as “the trial court), has yet to form its opinion as to whether offence under
Bail App No. 14/2026
2
Section 27A of NDPS is made out or not, this bail application is disposed
of with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the learned trial Court for
grant of bail after the order on charge/discharge is passed by the learned
trial Court.
+
(Rajnesh Oswal)
Judge
JAMMU
28.04.2026
NEHA-1
Neha Kumari
2026.04.28 17:49
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
