Mohd. Shoket Khan vs Shaleen Kabra on 24 April, 2026

    0
    36
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Jammu & Kashmir High Court

    Mohd. Shoket Khan vs Shaleen Kabra on 24 April, 2026

                                                                         Sr.No. 18
                                                                                 2026:JKLHC-JMU:1168
          HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
                            AT JAMMU
    CJ Court
                     Case: CPSW No. 294/2016 in
                           SWP No.521/2015
    
    Mohd. Shoket Khan                                       ..... Appellant/Petitioner(s)
    
                              Through: None
                         Vs
    
    Shaleen Kabra, Secy. Education & Ors.                           ..... Respondent(s)
    
                              Through: Ms. Saliqa Sheikh, Assisting Counsel vice
                                       Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG
    Coram:       HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
    
                                          ORDER
    

    24.04.2026
    Vide this petition, the petitioner seeks initiation of the contempt
    proceedings against the respondent-Authorities for not implementing the
    judgment dated March 03, 2015 rendered in SWP No. 521/2015 (Mohd. Shoket
    Khan Vs. State
    and ors.).

    A bare reading of the order referred to above indicates that the petition
    preferred by the petitioner was disposed of by the Writ Court with a direction to
    the respondent-Authorities to consider the claim of the petitioner in the light of
    the judgments passed in SWP No. 2288/2012, 1263/2006 and 286/2014.

    SPONSORED

    Response/objections on behalf of the respondents have been
    submitted. And, per the averments set out in para-7 thereof, the claim of the
    petitioner was examined by the respondent-Authorities with reference to the
    rules, Government orders issued from time to time as also the provisions laid
    down in
    the Scheme. But it was found that the relief claimed for retrospective
    effect of service w.e.f. 01.10.2010 was untenable. Thus, it appears that nothing
    substantive survives in the petition.

    Accordingly, the same is disposed of as having been rendered
    infructuous. However, in the event any dispute/cause of action/interest still
    survives, the petitioner is at liberty to move an appropriate application for
    revival of the present petition and its decision on merits.

                                   (                               (ARUN PALLI)
                                                                  CHIEF JUSTICE
    Jammu
    24.04.2026
    Pawan Chopra/Secy.
     

    [ad_1]

    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here