Sunil Babu Bhoir vs State Of Maharashtra on 22 April, 2026

    0
    32
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Bombay High Court

    Sunil Babu Bhoir vs State Of Maharashtra on 22 April, 2026

    2026:BHC-AS:19107                                                             BA_2065_2025.DOC
    
    
    
    
                                                                                                  Prasad
                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                 CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.2065 OF 2025
    
                        Sunil Bhoir                                              ...Applicant
                              Versus
                        State of Maharashtra                                     ...Respondent
    
                                                   WITH
                                    INTERIM APPLICATION NO.4307 OF 2025
                                                     IN
                                 CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.2065 OF 2025
                        Jeetendra Ramakant Yadav                    ...Applicant
                              Versus
                        State of Maharashtra                        ...Respondent
    
                        Mr. Abhaykumar Apte, for the Applicant.
                        Mr. A.R. Kapadnis, APP for the Respondent - State.
                        Mr. Datta Mane, for the Applicant in IA/4307/2025.
                        API - Ganesh Kekan, Naigaon Police Station, MBVV, present.
    
    
                                           CORAM:                   R. M. JOSHI, J.
                                           RESERVED ON:             17th APRIL, 2026.
                                           PRONOUNCED ON :          22nd APRIL, 2026.
                        PC:-
    
                        1.            By this application, the applicant seeks bail in
                        connection with C.R. No. I-155 of 2023 registered with Naigaon
                        Police Station, Palghar for the offences punishable u/s 307, 386,
                        324, 452, 143, 147, 148, 149, 427, 504, 506 and 120(B) of
                        Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short "IPC"), Section 135 of the
                        Maharashtra Police Act,1951 and sections 4 & 25 of Arms Act,
                        1959 imposed and impleaded with sections 3(1) (ii), 3(2), 3(4)
                        of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1989 (for
                        short "MCOCA").
    
    
                                                      Page 1 of 8
                                                      nd
                                                    22 April, 2026.
    
    
    
                    ::: Uploaded on - 23/04/2026                       ::: Downloaded on - 23/04/2026 21:54:18 :::
                                                                    BA_2065_2025.DOC
    
    
    
    
     2.              The records indicate that on June 20, 2023, an
     encounter occurred at the office of the informant, Mr. Jitendra
     Ramakant Yadav, involving a demand for ₹1 Crore related to
     land litigation and a claim of affiliation with the 'Gang of
     Sheth.' On the following day, June 21, 2023, at approximately
     17:30 hours, a group of individuals arrived at the same
     premises. During this incident, several four-wheeled vehicles
     were damaged, and physical injuries were caused to the
     informant's legs and a head injury to his servant, Mr. Bhuvad.
     Consequently, C.R. No. I-155/2023 was registered at Naigaon
     Police Station. The Applicant was subsequently arrested on
     June 23, 2023, and provisions of MCOCA were later applied to
     the case.
    
     3.               The investigation led to the recovery of a white
     moped from the scene of the offence and the seizure of wooden
     sticks     from      Accused   No.    4,   Rohit    Sontakke,         under       a
     memorandum panchnama dated June 26, 2023. Mobile phones
     were also seized from the applicants, however, the forensic
     laboratory report regarding these devices has remained pending
     for over one year. In terms of procedural compliance under
     MCOCA, the Competent Authority granted Approval under
     Section 23(1)(a) on August 10, 2023, followed by a sanction
     for prosecution under Section 23(2) by the Commissioner of
     Police, Mira Bhayander Vasai Virar, on September 19, 2023. The
     charge-sheet came to be filed against the accused.
    
     4.            The learned Counsel for the applicant has submitted
     that the entire identification process is a "farce" and a product
     of the investigating agency's imagination. It is pointed out that
    
    
                                      Page 2 of 8
                                      nd
                                    22 April, 2026.
    
    
    
    ::: Uploaded on - 23/04/2026                        ::: Downloaded on - 23/04/2026 21:54:18 :::
                                                                        BA_2065_2025.DOC
    
    
    
    
     while      the      FIR       names        the   applicants,    the      informant
     simultaneously admitted that the assailants were masked and
     unknown to him at the time of the incident. Furthermore, there
     is a glaring discrepancy between the FIR, which alleges ten
     attackers, and the CCTV footage of the incident, which depicts
     only 4 to 5 masked individuals. It is pointed out that in respect
     of incident dated 20th June, 2023 NC came to be lodged,
     wherein there is no allegation of demand of any money by way
     of extortion etc. It is thus his submission that false case is
     sought to be made out subsequently by Informant. It is thus
     contended that the Applicant was not present at the scene i.e.
     the second motion and as such there is no evidence to connect
     the Applicant with this crime. It is further submitted that the
     Applicant has no criminal history. According to him there is no
     likelihood of commencement and conclusion of trial in
     reasonable time. On these amongst other contentions he seeks
     bail.
    
     5.               The learned APP appearing for the Respondent-
     State opposed the application contending that the present case
     involves a serious offense of organized crime, wherein a ransom
     of ₹1 Crore was demanded by invoking the name of the "Gang
     of Sheth" to settle land disputes. It is submitted that the
     incident occurred in two stages; initially through a threat on
     June 20, 2023, followed by a violent assault on June 21, 2023,
     where approximately ten individuals entered the informant's
     premises with their faces masked. During this assault, four-
     wheeled vehicles were damaged, and the informant and his
     servant, Mr. Bhuvad, were physically assaulted, the latter
    
    
    
                                           Page 3 of 8
                                           nd
                                       22 April, 2026.
    
    
    
    ::: Uploaded on - 23/04/2026                            ::: Downloaded on - 23/04/2026 21:54:18 :::
                                                                  BA_2065_2025.DOC
    
    
    
    
     sustaining a head injury. He referred to statements of witnesses
     in order to seek involvement of Applicant in the crime.
     Reference is made to the statements of Ankush, Shivmsingh,
     Yogesh Kothari, Mhatre and confessional statement of co-
     accused Pratik Joshi in order to argue that there is enough
     material on record to indicate the involvement of Applicant in
     this case. According to him, given the gravity of the attempt to
     murder and extortion, the prosecution maintains that the
     invocation of Sections 307 and 387 of the IPC, alongside the
     special provisions of the MCOCA, is fully justified.
    
     6.               Perusal of the record indicates that on the basis of
     this statement of Informant, offence came to be registered
     against the Applicant and the co-accused. The FIR indicates that
     on 19th June, 2023 a phone call was received by the Informant
     in connection with some transaction about land. On 20 th June,
     2023, three co-accused came to the office of the Informant and
     threatened him. In this regard, non-cognizable report was
     lodged by the Informant to the concerned police station. In the
     said report there is no allegation made by the Informant with
     regard to threats given by those persons in respect of any
     transaction of land. Thereafter, on 21 st June, 2023 another
     incident occurred, in which the persons named in the FIR came
     to the office of the Informant and caused assault on the
     Informant and witnesses. They demanded Rs.2 crores from the
     Informant. Damage was caused to the vehicles as well as the
     property.
    
     7.               Insofar as the present Applicant is concerned, in the
     FIR there is no reference with regard to presence of the
    
    
                                      Page 4 of 8
                                      nd
                                    22 April, 2026.
    
    
    
    ::: Uploaded on - 23/04/2026                      ::: Downloaded on - 23/04/2026 21:54:18 :::
                                                                 BA_2065_2025.DOC
    
    
    
    
     Applicant at the time of occurrence of both the incidents. In
     order to attribute the said presence, the prosecution relies upon
     the statements of Ankush, Shivamsing and Harish Patil, who
     claim presence of the Applicant on 20 th June, 2023. Similarly,
     reference is made to the confessional statement of the co-
     accused Pratik Joshi, recorded before the authority under the
     MCOC Act. Prima facie perusal of the record does not indicate
     the presence of the Applicant at the spot on 21 st June, 2023, in
     which the assault came to be caused on the Informant and
     witnesses so also damage is caused to the property.
    
     8.               The prosecution seeks to place reliance on the
     statement of Mhatre who said to have interest in the land which
     is purchased by the Informant from its erstwhile owner.
     Referring to the said statement it is sought to be argued that it
     is the present Applicant who has introduced him to the co-
     accused for the purpose of recovery of the money from the
     Informant.
    
     9.               Now question arises as to whether even accepting
     the case of these witnesses to be true, the Applicant can be said
     to be the member of the gang of co-accused in order to invoke
     provisions of MCOC Act against him. As recorded earlier,
     involvement of the Applicant is not seen in the crime or the
     incident which took place on 21st June, 2023. As far as the
     presence of the Applicant at the spot on 20 th June, 2023 is
     concerned, there is no specific evidence on record to indicate
     the presence of the Applicant and his participation in the crime
     in question. The statement of co-accused Pratik only states
     about Applicant accompanying the co-accused in their vehicle,
    
    
                                     Page 5 of 8
                                     nd
                                   22 April, 2026.
    
    
    
    ::: Uploaded on - 23/04/2026                     ::: Downloaded on - 23/04/2026 21:54:18 :::
                                                                      BA_2065_2025.DOC
    
    
    
    
     but states nothing further, even presence of applicant at spot. It
     would not be sufficient for the prosecution to have such
     evidence in order to connect the Applicant with the incident in
     question.
    
     10.              This is more so in view of the fact that at the first
     instance, NCR was reported to the concerned police station with
     regard to the incident occurred on 20th June, 2023. In the said
     NCR, reference is made about presence of three persons only. It
     is by way of recording subsequent statement the involvement of
     the Applicant and other accused is sought in the crime. Even if
     it is accepted for the sake argument that initially the Informant
     did not lodge the report of the incident as it occurred, it is a
     matter of fact that there is a discrepancy in the report in respect
     of the persons involved in the first incident.
    
     11.              The      case   of    prosecution    that     Applicant         has
     approached Harishchandra Mhatre for helping him to recover
     money by itself would not make him part of the gang/crime
     syndicate. This observation is inevitable in view of the fact that,
     there is absolutely nothing on record to show that the co-
     accused approached to the Informant in connection with the
     said land. There is nothing on record to hold that the land
     which was sought to be referred by the Mhatre was the matter
     of dispute between the parties. There are no statements
     indicating any amount being sought by accused for and on
     behalf of Mhatre.
    
     12.              Admittedly, the Applicant has no criminal history
     and this is the first crime registered against him. In order to
    
    
    
                                           Page 6 of 8
                                           nd
                                       22 April, 2026.
    
    
    
    ::: Uploaded on - 23/04/2026                          ::: Downloaded on - 23/04/2026 21:54:18 :::
                                                                     BA_2065_2025.DOC
    
    
    
    
     apply provisions of MCOC Act, prima facie there must be
     evidence to indicate that the Applicant is a member of the
     organized crime syndicate and has participated in the crime in
     question.        On      both   counts,    there    is    no      prima       facie
     satisfactory/sufficient         evidence    on     record.     In     fact,     the
     statements recorded during the course of investigation i.e.
     statement of 20th June, 2023 and subsequent statement are
     inconsistent with regard to the role of the present Applicant. It
     is also necessary to take note of the fact that the First Informant
     has given details and names of all persons who participated in
     the said assault on 21st June, 2023. He does not give specific
     name of Applicant to be one of the persons at the time of
     incident on 20th June, 2023.
    
     13.              In such circumstances, when there is no clear cut
     evidence in order to show that Applicant is the member of the
     organized crime syndicate, and in view of the fact that he has
     no criminal history, he is entitled to bail. The Applicant is in jail
     since 2023. In view of Section 21(4) of the MCOC Act, this
     Court has no reason to believe that the Applicant has
     committed the offence and considering his past clean record,
     there is no likelihood that he would commit the offence if
     enlarged on bail. Hence, following order.
    
                                        ORDER
    

    i) The Bail Application stands allowed.

    ii) In connection with C.R. No. I-155 of 2023 registered with
    Naigaon Police Station, the Applicant be enlarged on bail on

    SPONSORED

    Page 7 of 8
    nd
    22 April, 2026.

    ::: Uploaded on – 23/04/2026 ::: Downloaded on – 23/04/2026 21:54:18 :::

    BA_2065_2025.DOC

    furnishing PR Bond of Rs.30,000/- with one or two sureties in
    the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.

    iii) The Applicant to attend proceedings before the Trial Court
    unless exempted.

    iv) The Applicant is directed to attend the concerned police
    station as and when called for by the Investigating Officer.

    14. It is made clear that the observations made herein are
    prima facie and are confined to this Application and the learned
    Trial Judge to decide the case on its own merits, uninfluenced by
    the observations made herein.

    (R. M. JOSHI, J.)
    {

    Page 8 of 8
    nd
    22 April, 2026.

    ::: Uploaded on – 23/04/2026 ::: Downloaded on – 23/04/2026 21:54:18 :::



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here