― Advertisement ―

HomeM/S. Shyam Electric vs The Union Of India on 15 April, 2026

M/S. Shyam Electric vs The Union Of India on 15 April, 2026

ADVERTISEMENT

Patna High Court

M/S. Shyam Electric vs The Union Of India on 15 April, 2026

Author: Mohit Kumar Shah

Bench: Mohit Kumar Shah, Arun Kumar Jha

          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                   Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11303 of 2025
     ======================================================
     M/s. Shyam Electric a Proprietary concern having its place of business at
     Chandni Chowk Market, Frazer Road, P.S. Kotwali, Town and District Patna
     through its Proprietor, Om Prakash Lath, aged about 65 years, son of Late
     Shyam Prasad Lath, Resident of Shyam Bhawan, New Punaichak, Near R D
     Tower, Bishwaraiya Bhawan, Phulwari, P.S. Sashtri Nagar, District Patna.

                                                                      ... ... Petitioner
                                            Versus

1.   The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Government
     of India, New Delhi.
2.   The Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi.
3.   The State of Bihar through the Commissioner of State Tax cum Secretary,
     Department of State Tax, Government of Bihar, Main Secretariat, Patna.
4.   The Commissioner of State Tax cum Secretary, Department of State Tax,
     Government of Bihar, Main Secretariat, Patna.
5.   The Additional Commissioner of State Tax, Patna Division, Patna.
6.   The Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, Patna West Circle, Patna.
7.   The Joint Commissioner, State Tax, Patna West Circle, Patna.
8.   The Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Patna West Circle, Patna.

                                               ... ... Respondents
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner        :        Mr. Mohit Agarwal, Advocate
                                        Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocate
                                        Mr. Vikash Khanna, Advocate
     For the CGST              :        Ms. Shilpi Keshri, Advocate
     For the State             :        Mr. Kumar Vivek, GP-7
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
                               and
             HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                         ORAL JUDGMENT
     (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH)

      Date : 15-04-2026

                          Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

                          2. The present writ petition has been filed seeking

      the following reliefs:

                                   "(a) For quashing the ex parte Assessment
 Patna High Court CWJC No.11303 of 2025 dt.15-04-2026
                                           2/8




                         Order dated 24.04.2024 passed under Section 73
                         of the BGST Act, 2017 by the Respondent Deputy
                         Commissioner, State Tax, Patna West Circle, Patna
                         and subsequent demand raised in Form DRC 07
                         dated 24.04.2024 with respect to Financial Year
                         2018-19 as the same has been passed without
                         granting any opportunity of hearing as
                         contemplated under Section 75 of the BGST Act,
                         2017 and also without service of any notice, much
                         less, show cause notice by any mode of service as
                         contemplated under Section 169 of the BGST Act,
                         2017 and also ignoring the fact that a proceeding
                         with respect to similar Financial Year initiated
                         vide show cause notice dated 12.02.2020 was also
                         pending, the copy of which was also never served
                         to the Petitioner by any mode as contemplated
                         under Section 169 of the BGST Act, 2017;

                                (b) For holding that passing of the ex parte
                         impugned assessment order dated 24.04.2024
                         without granting an opportunity of hearing as
                         contemplated under Section 75 of the BGST Act,
                         2017 is violation of principle of natural justice and
                         also ignoring the fact that one earlier proceeding
                         with respect to similar Financial Year vide show
                         cause notice dated 12.02.2020 was also pending
                         under consideration and, therefore, the impugned
                         ex parte assessment order is liable to be quashed;

                                (c) For holding that as the Petitioner Firm
                         was not served with the purported show cause
                         notices or the impugned ex parte assessment order
                         by a valid mode of service as contemplated under
                         Section 169 of the BGST Act, 2017, the same
                         amounts to principle of natural justice and the
                         impugned order is liable to be quashed and set
                         aside;

                               (d) For holding that in the facts of the
                         present case, the impugned assessment order dated
                         24.04.2024

is an ex parte order as no notices were
ever served upon the Petitioner firm in terms of
Patna High Court CWJC No.11303 of 2025 dt.15-04-2026
3/8

Section 169 of the BGST Act, 2017 nor the
Petitioner was granted an opportunity of hearing
in terms of Section 75(4) of the BGST Act, 2017;

SPONSORED

(e) For holding that the Respondent Deputy
Commissioner of State Tax, Patna West Circle,
Patna could not have initiated a fresh proceeding
vide show cause notice dated 25.10.2023 as for the
similar Financial Year a show cause notice in
Form DRC 01 dated 12.02.2020 was already
initiated, though the copy of which was also never
served upon the Petitioner as the grounds for
initiation of proceedings in both the show cause
notices wherein mostly similar and identical;
and/or for any other relief(s) as Your Lordships
may deem fit and proper in the facts of the present
case and in the interest of justice.”

3. The brief facts of the case are that a show cause

notice dated 25.10.2023 for the tax period: April, 2018 – March,

2019 was issued to the petitioner by the Assistant

Commissioner, State Tax, Patna West Circle, Patna, wherein the

reply was required to be submitted by the petitioner by

25.11.2023. Thereafter, a reminder dated 05.12.2023 was issued

to the petitioner by the Office of the Assistant Commissioner,

State Tax, Patna West Circle, Patna fixing the date of personal

hearing as 08.12.2023 at 12:35 hours. Again a reminder dated

06.04.2024 was issued to the petitioner by the Office of the

Deputy Commissioner, State Tax, Patna West Circle, Patna,

fixing the date of hearing as 09.04.2024 at 13:01 hours. The

petitioner ultimately submitted response to the show cause
Patna High Court CWJC No.11303 of 2025 dt.15-04-2026
4/8

notice on 10.04.2024 in form GST DRC – 06, wherein at serial

no. 7 he had opted for personal hearing, however, no personal

hearing was granted to the petitioner and instead Office of the

Joint Commissioner, State Tax, Patna West Circle, Patna, has

passed the impugned order dated 24.04.2024 under the pen and

signature of Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, Patna West

Circle, Patna, fixing tax liability along with interest and penalty,

totaling to a sum of Rs. 26,08,987/-.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits

that under Section 75(5) of the Bihar Goods and Services Tax

Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “Act, 2017”), the proper

officer is required to grant time to the assessee and adjourn the

hearing for reasons to be recorded in writing, if sufficient cause

is shown by the person chargeable with tax, however no

adjournment shall be granted for more than three times to a

person during the proceedings. Thus, it is submitted that since

only two reminders were issued to the petitioner, whereafter the

petitioner had filed his reply to the show cause on 10.04.2024,

seeking opportunity of personal hearing, the assessing officer

ought to have granted an opportunity to the petitioner to file his

reply and advance his arguments personally.

5. Reliance has also been placed on Section 75(4)
Patna High Court CWJC No.11303 of 2025 dt.15-04-2026
5/8

of the Act, 2017, which is reproduced hereinbelow:

“An opportunity of hearing shall be granted
where a request is received in writing from the
person chargeable with tax or penalty, or where
any adverse decision is contemplated against such
person.”

6. In view of the aforesaid, it is submitted by the

learned counsel for the petitioner that at least one opportunity be

granted to the petitioner to file his reply and appear before the

Assessing Officer to advance arguments, failing which the

petitioner undertakes that the demand so raised by the

respondents would be paid by the petitioner.

7. Per contra, the learned counsel for the

respondent State has vehemently opposed the present petition by

submitting that three opportunities have already been granted to

the petitioner in as much as after issuance of show cause notice

to the petitioner on 25.10.2023, reminders dated 05.12.2023 and

06.04.2024 were also issued to the petitioner, however the

petitioner did not avail the said opportunities in as much as he

neither filed any show cause reply nor appeared before the

concerned authority on the dates so fixed, nonetheless it is

submitted that he is not averse to the idea of the matter being

remanded back by way of final opportunity. Therefore, it is

submitted that in case the matter is being remanded back to the
Patna High Court CWJC No.11303 of 2025 dt.15-04-2026
6/8

authorities, it be stipulated that in case the petitioner does not

appear before the Assessing Officer along with his show cause

reply on the date so fixed by this Court, the impugned order

dated 24.04.2024 passed by the Office of the Joint

Commissioner, State Tax, Patna, West Circle, Patna, shall stand

revived and the petitioner shall be liable to pay the total demand

amount.

8. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties

and perused the materials on record. It is apparent from the

records that opportunity of personal hearing was afforded to the

petitioner only twice, i.e. vide reminders dated 05.12.2023 and

06.04.2024, however Section 75(5) of the Act, 2017 permits that

an adjournment can be granted for three times. Another aspect

of the matter is that in the reply to the reminder show cause

dated 06.04.2024, the petitioner had filed his response on

10.04.2024 in form GST – DRC – 06 and at serial no. 7 thereof,

he had opted for personal hearing, however no personal

hearing was accorded to the petitioner and instead

the impugned order dated 24.04.2024 was passed under

the pen and signature of Deputy Commissioner of State Tax,

Patna West Circle, Patna, fixing tax liability along with interest

and penalty totaling to the sum of Rs. 26,08,987/-. At this
Patna High Court CWJC No.11303 of 2025 dt.15-04-2026
7/8

juncture, we may take note of Section 75(4) of the Act, 2017,

which mandates grant of an opportunity of hearing where a

request in writing is received from the person chargeable with

tax or penalty of where any adverse decision is contemplated

against such person. Thus, in view of a request having been

admittedly received by the proper officer in writing for personal

hearing on 10.04.2024, it was incumbent upon the proper officer

to have granted an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner prior

to passing of the impugned order dated 24.04.2024, thus the said

omission on the part of the proper officer has resulted in

miscarriage of justice and violation of the principles of natural

justice making the impugned order dated 24.04.2024 liable to be

set aside.

9. Having regards to the facts and circumstances of

the case and for the foregoing reasons, we deem it fit and proper

to quash the order dated 24.04.2024 passed by the Deputy

Commissioner of State Tax, Patna West Circle, Patna, and

remand the matter back to him, fixing 05.05.2026 as the date of

personal hearing, on which date the petitioner / its proprietor /

authorized representative shall appear before the Concerned

Officer at 12:35 PM and submit show cause reply as also

advance arguments, failing which the order dated 24.04.2024
Patna High Court CWJC No.11303 of 2025 dt.15-04-2026
8/8

shall stand revived and the petitioner shall be liable to

immediately deposit the total demand amount of Rs. 26,08,987/-

as also other such sums which may have become due and

payable in the meantime.

10. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed

of with the aforesaid observations and directions.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

(Arun Kumar Jha, J)

Shahnawaz/-

AFR/NAFR                AFR
CAV DATE                N/A
Uploading Date          22.04.2026
Transmission Date       N/A
 



Source link