― Advertisement ―

HomeAmal Krishna vs State Of Kerala on 21 April, 2026

Amal Krishna vs State Of Kerala on 21 April, 2026

ADVERTISEMENT

Kerala High Court

Amal Krishna vs State Of Kerala on 21 April, 2026

                                                     2026:KER:33149




          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                             PRESENT

            THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.GIRISH

 TUESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL 2026 / 1ST VAISAKHA, 1948

                  CRL.MC NO. 3334 OF 2026

 CRIME NO.101/2019 OF Kodungallur Police Station, Thrissur

PETITIONER(S)/2ND ACCUSED:

          AMAL KRISHNA,
          AGED 28 YEARS, S/O.SUDHI,
          PULLAKKATT HOUSE, PODIYAN BAZAR,
          EDAVILANGU DESOM, KODUNGALLORE TALUK,
          THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680688.

          BY ADV.
          SRI.N.L.BITTO


RESPONDENT(S)/STATE AND COMPLAINANT:

    1     STATE OF KERALA,
          REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
          KODUNGALLORE POLICE STATION, THROUGH THE
          PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA
          AT ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031.

    2     SHIBU,
          AGED 30 YEARS, S/O.PAVITHRAN,
          ARAKKAPARAMBIL HOUSE, CHANTHAPURA DESOM,
          KODUNGALORE TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT,
          PIN - 680664.

          BY ADVS.
          SRI.VINEETH V.
          SRI.M.C.ASHI, SENIOR PUBLIC PROSECUTOR.
                            2

Crl.M.C. No.3334 of 2026

                                                   2026:KER:33149




     THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 21.04.2026, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
                                      3

Crl.M.C. No.3334 of 2026

                                                                  2026:KER:33149



                                         ORDER

The petitioner is the 2nd accused in Crime No.101 of 2019 of

Kodungalloor Police Station, Thrissur District. The offences alleged

SPONSORED

against him are under Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 323, 324,

308, 294 (b), 506, 149 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860.

2. In the present petition, the petitioner would contend

that the issue involved in this case has been amicably settled with

the defacto complainant, and hence the proceedings against him

are liable to be quashed.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the

learned counsel representing the 2nd respondent and the learned

Public Prosecutor representing the State of Kerala.

4. The defacto complainant has filed an affidavit before

this Court stating that the issue involved in this case has been

amicably settled, and hence there is no need to continue the

prosecution against the petitioner.

5. The learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions,

submitted that the defacto complainant has given statement to

the Investigating Officer also, to the effect that the matter has
4

Crl.M.C. No.3334 of 2026

2026:KER:33149

been amicably settled with the accused, and hence he is not at all

interested in continuing the prosecution.

6. It is true that the offences involved in this case include

Section 308 of IPC. But still it has to be stated that when the

crime is the offshoot of private issues between the parties, and

they have resolved the issues amicably, the quashment of

proceedings could be resorted to maintain harmonious

relationship between the parties. The proposition of law in the

above regard has been laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in

Yogendra Yadav v. State of Jharkhand [(2014) 9 SCC 653],

wherein it has been held that when quashing of proceedings on

account of compromise would bring about peace, and would

secure ends of justice, High Court should not hesitate to quash

them.

7. It appears that the issue involved in this case is purely

private in nature. As the matter has been amicably settled

between the parties, and the defacto complainant is not at all

interested in continuing the prosecution, there is no purpose to be

fulfilled by the continuance of the prosecution in this case.

Therefore, the request of the petitioner to quash the proceedings
5

Crl.M.C. No.3334 of 2026

2026:KER:33149

pursuant to the registration of the Crime against him, has to be

allowed.

In the result, the petition stands allowed. The proceedings

against the 2nd accused in Crime No.101 of 2019 of Kodungalloor

Police Station, Thrissur, are hereby quashed.

(sd/-)
G. GIRISH, JUDGE
anm
6

Crl.M.C. No.3334 of 2026

2026:KER:33149

APPENDIX OF CRL.MC NO. 3334 OF 2026

PETITIONER’S ANNEXURES
Annexure-1 A TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.101 OF
2019 OF THE KODUNGALLORE POLICE STATION
DATED 17/1/2019.

Annexure-2 A TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME
NO.101 OF 2019 OF THE KODUNGALLORE POLICE
STATION DATED 29/6/2019.

Annexure-3 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGEMENT IN SC.806 OF
2019 OF THE ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT
IRINJALAKUDA DATED 8/10/2025.

Annexure-4 ORIGINAL OF THE AFFIDAVIT OF THE 2ND
RESPONDENT DATED 28/3/2026.



Source link