Unknown vs Court On Its Own Motion V. Dhairya … on 20 April, 2026

    0
    39
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Himachal Pradesh High Court

    Unknown vs Court On Its Own Motion V. Dhairya … on 20 April, 2026

    Bench: Vivek Singh Thakur, Sandeep Sharma

    Court on its own motion v. Dhairya Sushant and Anr.

    Cr.OPC No. 01 of 2025

    SPONSORED

    .

    20.4.2026 Present: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, Mr.
    Ramakant Sharma & Mr. Sushant Keprate,

    Additional Advocates General, Mr. Raj Negi &
    Ms. Swati Draik, Deputy Advocates General
    and Mr. Shalabh Thakur, Assistant Advocate
    General, for the petitioner.

    of
    Mr. Aditya Chouhan Advocate, for the
    respondents.

    Respondents-Contemnors present in person.
    rt
    For request made by learned counsel appearing

    for the respondents, matter is adjourned.

    List on 7.5.2026.

    ( Vivek Singh Thakur ),
    Judge

    ( Sandeep Sharma ),
    Judge
    April 20, 2026

    manjit

    ::: Downloaded on – 20/04/2026 20:35:31 :::CIS
    State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. v. Techer Power Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

    Civil Revision No. 29 of 2018

    .

    06.12.2023 Present: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for the
    petitioners.

    Mr. Goverdhan Sharma, Advocate vice Mr.
    Satish Kumar, Advocate, for the respondent.

    of
    As prayed, list alongwith similar matter bearing

    Civil Revision No. 36 of 2021 in the 3rd week of March,

    2024.

    rt

    ( Vivek Singh Thakur ),
    Judge

    ( Sandeep Sharma ),
    Judge

    December 06, 2023
    manjit

    ::: Downloaded on – 20/04/2026 20:35:31 :::CIS
    M/s Meter(s) India Pvt. Ltd. v. Excise and Taxation Commissioner

    CR No. 132 of 2015

    .

    06.12.2023 Present: Mr. Goverdhan Lal Sharma, Advocate, for the
    petitioner.

    Ms. Seema Sharma, Deputy Advocate General,
    for the respondent.

    of
    As prayed, list in 3rd week of March, 2024.

    rt ( Vivek Singh Thakur ),
    Judge

    ( Sandeep Sharma ),
    Judge
    December 06, 2023

    manjit

    ::: Downloaded on – 20/04/2026 20:35:31 :::CIS
    Satish Kumar v. HP State Forest Corporation Ltd and Anr.

    CWPOA No. 5506 of 2020

    .

    06.12.2023 Present: None for the petitioner.

    Ms. Kiran Dhiman, Advocate, for the

    respondents.

    Though on 30.11.2023, matter was adjourned

    of
    for 20.12.2023, however, today, matter has been taken up

    for consideration on the basis of mention made by learned
    rt
    counsel for the respondents.

    Learned counsel for the respondents submits

    that on 30.11.2023, she had been imparted instructions in

    two three matters listed on that day and by an inadvertent

    mistake, she construed that instruction had been imparted

    in the present matter and she had made submissions under

    a mis-conceived notion, it was incorrect according to the

    latest instructions imparted to her, and therefore, she is

    praying modification of the order in the matter by ignoring

    submissions made by her on 30.11.2023. Prayer is

    accepted. Ordered accordingly.

    List for consideration on the date already fixed

    i.e. 20.12.2023.

    ( Vivek Singh Thakur ),
    Judge

    ( Sandeep Sharma ),
    Judge
    December 06, 2023
    manjit

    ::: Downloaded on – 20/04/2026 20:35:31 :::CIS
    Santosh Nanta v. State of Himachal Pradesh and others

    LPA No. 109 of 2023

    .

    06.12.2023 Present: Mr. Hemant Kumar Thakur, Advocate vice Mr.
    Parkash Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

    Mr. Baldev Negi, Additional Advocate General,
    for respondents No. 1 and 2.

    Mr. Surender Sharma, Advocate, for respondent

    of
    No.3.

    For request made on behalf of original counsel
    rt
    for the petitioner, matter is adjourned.

    As prayed, list after one week.

    ( Vivek Singh Thakur ),

    Judge

    ( Sandeep Sharma ),
    Judge

    December 06, 2023
    manjit

    ::: Downloaded on – 20/04/2026 20:35:31 :::CIS
    M/s Innova Captab v. Union of India and others

    CWP No. 1762 of 2022

    .

    06.12.2023 Present: Mr. Praveen Sharma, Advocate, for the
    petitioner.

    Mr. Rajinder Singh Thakur, Central
    Government Counsel, for respondent No.1.

    Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Ms.

    of
    Vandana Kuthaiala, Advocate, for respondents
    No. 2 and 3.

    Keeping in view the nature of the lis, response
    rt
    of respondent No.1 may not be necessary.

    Response on behalf of respondents No. 2 and 3

    stands filed. Last opportunity of two weeks is granted to file

    rejoinder, failing which right to file the same shall stand

    closed.

    List for consideration after two weeks.

    ( Vivek Singh Thakur ),
    Judge

    ( Sandeep Sharma ),
    Judge
    December 06, 2023
    manjit

    ::: Downloaded on – 20/04/2026 20:35:31 :::CIS
    Sant Ram v. State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors

    CWPOA No. 6484 of 2020

    .

    06.12.2023 Present: Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate, for the petitioner.

    Mr. Baldev Negi, Additional Advocate General,

    for respondents No.1 to 4.

    Mr. Hemant Kumar Thakur, Advocate, for
    respondent No.5.

    of
    Mr. Ankit, Advocate, vice Mr. Neeraj K. Sharma,
    Advocate, for respondent No.6.
    rt
    Reply on behalf of respondent No.6 is stated to

    have been filed in the Registry today. Be taken on record, if

    in order.

    Reply on behalf of respondent No.5, as prayed,

    be filed within three weeks. Rejoinder thereto, as prayed, be

    filed within three weeks thereafter.

    List after Winter Vacation. In the meanwhile,

    rejoinder to reply filed by respondent No.6 be also filed.

    ( Vivek Singh Thakur ),
    Judge

    ( Sandeep Sharma ),
    Judge
    December 06, 2023
    manjit

    ::: Downloaded on – 20/04/2026 20:35:31 :::CIS
    Tarlok Kumar v. State of Himachal Pradesh and another

    CWPOA No. 6419 of 2020

    .

    06.12.2023 Present: Mr. Karan Singh Parmar, Advocate, for the
    petitioner.

    Mr. Baldev Negi, Additional Advocate General,
    for the respondents.

    of
    Last opportunity of two weeks, as prayed, is

    granted to file reply in terms of order passed on previous

    date i.e. 9.11.2023.

    rt
    List for consideration on 27.12.2023.

    ( Vivek Singh Thakur ),
    Judge

    ( Sandeep Sharma ),

    Judge
    December 06, 2023

    manjit

    ::: Downloaded on – 20/04/2026 20:35:31 :::CIS
    Upinder Singh v. State

    CWPOA No. 6200 of 2020

    .

    06.12.2023 Present: None for the petitioner.

    Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Additional Advocate

    General, for the respondents.

    Actual date notice issued to the petitioner has

    of
    not been received back. Registry to obtain

    instructions/status from the concerned agency for the next
    rt
    date of hearing.

    List on 14.12.2023.

    ( Vivek Singh Thakur ),

    Judge

    ( Sandeep Sharma ),
    Judge

    December 06, 2023
    manjit

    ::: Downloaded on – 20/04/2026 20:35:31 :::CIS
    Maya Devi v. HPKVV

    CWPOA No. 6175 of 2020

    .

    06.12.2023 Present: Ms. Tamanna Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Arush
    Matlotia, Advocate, for the petitioner.

    Mr. Prince Chauhan, Advocate, for the
    respondent.

    of
    Four weeks’ time, as prayed, is granted to file

    power of attorney on behalf of the petitioner.

    rtAs prayed, list for consideration after Winter

    Vacation.

    ( Vivek Singh Thakur ),
    Judge

    ( Sandeep Sharma ),

    Judge
    December 06, 2023

    manjit

    ::: Downloaded on – 20/04/2026 20:35:31 :::CIS
    Sanjeev Kumar v. HPKVV

    CWPOA No. 6187 of 2020

    .

    06.12.2023 Present: Ms. Tamanna Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Arush
    Matlotia, Advocate, for the petitioner.

    Mr. Prince Chauhan, Advocate, for the
    respondent.

    of
    Four weeks’ time, as prayed, is granted to file

    power of attorney on behalf of the petitioner.

    rt As prayed, list for consideration after Winter

    Vacation.

    ( Vivek Singh Thakur ),
    Judge

    ( Sandeep Sharma ),

    Judge
    December 06, 2023

    manjit

    ::: Downloaded on – 20/04/2026 20:35:31 :::CIS
    Malka v. HPKVV

    CWPOA No. 6185 of 2020

    .

    06.12.2023 Present: Ms. Tamanna Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Arush
    Matlotia, Advocate, for the petitioner.

    Mr. Prince Chauhan, Advocate, for the
    respondent.

    of
    Four weeks’ time, as prayed, is granted to file

    power of attorney on behalf of the petitioner.

    As prayed, list for consideration after Winter
    rt
    Vacation.

    ( Vivek Singh Thakur ),
    Judge

    ( Sandeep Sharma ),

    Judge
    December 06, 2023

    manjit

    ::: Downloaded on – 20/04/2026 20:35:31 :::CIS
    Makhan Singh Mann v. CSKH PKV and Ors.

    CWPOA No. 4740 of 2020

    .

    06.12.2023 Present: Mr. Adarsh K. Vashista, Advocate, for the
    petitioner.

    Ms. Aruna Chauhan, Advocate, for the
    respondents.

    of
    As prayed, list on 14.12.2023.

    rt ( Vivek Singh Thakur ),
    Judge

    ( Sandeep Sharma ),
    Judge
    December 06, 2023

    manjit

    ::: Downloaded on – 20/04/2026 20:35:31 :::CIS
    Ranjeet Singh v. HPKVV

    CWPOA No. 6177 of 2020

    .

    06.12.2023 Present: Nemo for the petitioner.

    Mr. Prince Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent

    No.1.

    Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate
    General, for respondent No.2.

    of
    Notice issued to the petitioner stands duly

    served, but he has not chosen to pursue the matter as there
    rt
    is no representation on his behalf. It appears that

    petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter.

    Accordingly, present petition is dismissed in

    default as well as for non-prosecution.

    ( Vivek Singh Thakur ),

    Judge

    ( Sandeep Sharma ),
    Judge
    December 06, 2023
    manjit

    ::: Downloaded on – 20/04/2026 20:35:31 :::CIS
    Kamal Parkash v. State

    CWPOA No. 6202 of 2020

    .

    06.12.2023 Present: Nemo for the petitioner.

    Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Additional Advocate

    General, for the respondents.

    Actual date notice issued to the petitioner

    of
    stands duly served, but he has not chosen to pursue the

    matter as there is no representation on his behalf. It
    rt
    appears that petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

    matter.

    Accordingly, present petition is dismissed in

    default as well as for non-prosecution.

    ( Vivek Singh Thakur ),

    Judge

    ( Sandeep Sharma ),
    Judge
    December 06, 2023
    manjit

    ::: Downloaded on – 20/04/2026 20:35:31 :::CIS
    Ranjeet Singh v. HPKVV

    CWPOA No. 6177 of 2020

    .

    06.12.2023 Present: Nemo for the petitioner.

    Mr. Prince Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent

    No.1.

    Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate
    General, for respondent No.2.

    of
    Notice issued to the petitioner stands duly

    served, but he has not chosen to pursue the matter as there
    rt
    is no representation on his behalf. It appears that

    petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter.

    Accordingly, present petition is dismissed in

    default as well as for non-prosecution.

    ( Vivek Singh Thakur ),

    Judge

    ( Sandeep Sharma ),
    Judge
    December 06, 2023
    manjit

    ::: Downloaded on – 20/04/2026 20:35:31 :::CIS
    Bishambri Devi v. State

    CWPOA No. 6179 of 2020

    .

    06.12.2023 Present: Nemo for the petitioner.

    Mr. Prince Chauhan, Advocate, for the

    respondent.

    Actual date notice issued to the petitioner

    of
    stands duly served, but she has not chosen to pursue the

    matter as there is no representation on her behalf. It
    rt
    appears that petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

    matter.

    Accordingly, present petition is dismissed in

    default as well as for non-prosecution.

    ( Vivek Singh Thakur ),

    Judge

    ( Sandeep Sharma ),
    Judge
    December 06, 2023
    manjit

    ::: Downloaded on – 20/04/2026 20:35:31 :::CIS



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here