― Advertisement ―

Constitutional Perspectives (Book Recommendations)

I had a few conversations about the best books on the Constitution. FWIW, for me, the gold standard is still Seervai. It's a...
HomeParwez Alam @ Parvez Alam vs The State Of Bihar on 18...

Parwez Alam @ Parvez Alam vs The State Of Bihar on 18 April, 2026

ADVERTISEMENT

Patna High Court – Orders

Parwez Alam @ Parvez Alam vs The State Of Bihar on 18 April, 2026

Author: Satyavrat Verma

Bench: Satyavrat Verma

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15976 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-435 Year-2025 Thana- CHAPRA TOWN District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Parwez Alam @ Parvez Alam S/o Late Mobarak Hussain Resident of Mohalla
                 -Karim Chowk, P.S.- Chapra Town, District- Saran, Bihar, 841301

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Danish Raja
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Narsingh Tanti
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   18-04-2026

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

A.P.P. for the State.

SPONSORED

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case

registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420,

467,468,471 & 120-B of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

petitioner has antecedent of two cases under Section 498A of the

IPC read with other Sections. It is next submitted that in sum

and substance the allegation against the petitioner is that he was

appointed as a teacher based on forged certificate. It is next

submitted that had a show-cause been issued to the petitioner

seeking explanation with regard to his certificate perhaps the

instant FIR would not have been instituted but then without

seeking any explanation the Authority instituted the instant FIR.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15976 of 2026(3) dt.18-04-2026
2/2

It is also submitted that if privilege of anticipatory bail is

granted, the petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in

the investigation to prove his innocence.

4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for

anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned

counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, let the petitioner,

above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a

period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail

on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)

with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/Successor

Court in connection with Chapra Town P.S. Case No. 435 of

2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section

438(2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

(Satyavrat Verma, J)
khushbu/-

U      T
 



Source link