Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur
Vipin Son Of Shri Hansraj vs Jaipur City Transport Services Limited … on 18 April, 2026
[2026:RJ-JP:16464]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14882/2020
Vipin Son Of Shri Hansraj, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village
Purabsar, Tehsil Rawatsar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Jaipur City Transport Services Limited, Through Managing
Director, Registered Address, Second Floor, Old Woman
Hostel, Opp. Police Headquarter, Lalkothi, Jaipur 302015
2. Officer On Special Duty, Jaipur City Transport Services
Limited, Registered Address, Second Floor, Old Woman
Hostel, Opp. Police Headquarter, Lalkothi, Jaipur 302015
----Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14883/2020
Devendra Kumar Son Of Shri Ranglal Yadav, Aged About 35
Years, R/o Village Mau, Post Chandpur, Tehsil Mundawar, District
Alwar (Rajasthan)
—-Petitioner
Versus
1. Jaipur City Transport Services Limited, Through Managing
Director, Registered Address, Second Floor, Old Woman
Hostel, Opp. Police Headquarter, Lalkothi, Jaipur 302015
2. Officer On Special Duty, Jaipur City Transport Services
Limited, Registered Address, Second Floor, Old Woman
Hostel, Opp. Police Headquarter, Lalkothi, Jaipur 302015
—-Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Singh Shekhawat with
Ms. Priyanshi Jaiswal
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Arnav Singh for
Mr. Sandeep Pathak
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MUNNURI LAXMAN
Order
18/04/2026
1. On the request and with the consent of learned counsel
appearing on behalf of both the parties, the present writ petitions
are taken up and heard for final disposal at the admission stage.
(Uploaded on 18/04/2026 at 10:57:01 AM)
(Downloaded on 18/04/2026 at 08:32:05 PM)
[2026:RJ-JP:16464] (2 of 2) [CW-14882/2020]
2. The present writ petitions have been filed challenging the
order of the respondents dated 24.05.2018 (Annex.R/2) wherein
the period of participation of the petitioners in strike was treated
as break in service period.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents
produced an order dated 11.02.2026 passed by the respondents
by which the respondents have modified the order dated
24.05.2018 and removed the break in service period of the
petitioners. They have been regularized absent period by recalling
earlier order.
4. The order dated 11.02.2026 is taken on record.
5. In view of the above, the relief sought by the petitioners has
become infructuous.
6. Accordingly, the present writ petitions are dismissed as
having rendered infructuous.
(MUNNURI LAXMAN),J
32-33–PoonamS/-
(Uploaded on 18/04/2026 at 10:57:01 AM)
(Downloaded on 18/04/2026 at 08:32:05 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)