Veeraragavan vs The State Rep By, The Inspector Of Police on 10 April, 2026

    0
    39
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Madras High Court

    Veeraragavan vs The State Rep By, The Inspector Of Police on 10 April, 2026

                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
    
                                                            DATED : 10.04.2026
    
                                                                 CORAM
    
                                      THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN
    
                                                       Crl.O.P.No.9140 of 2026
    
                       Veeraragavan                                                    ... Petitioner(s)
    
                                                                   Vs.
    
                       State rep. by the Inspector of Police,
                       All Women Police Station,
                       Mettur, Salem.                                            ... Respondent(s)
                       [Crime No.5 of 2026]
    
                       PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023,
                       to enlarge the petitioner on bail concerned in Crime No.5 of 2026 pending on
                       the file of the respondent police.
    
    
    
                                        For Petitioner(s)          : Mr.Ramachandran
    
                                        For Respondent(s)          : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar
                                                                     Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
    
                                                                 ORDER
    

    The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on

    10.02.2026 for the alleged offence under Section 329 of BNS, 2023 and Section

    SPONSORED

    7 r/w 8 of POCSO Act, in Crime No.5 of 2026, on the file of the respondent

    police, seeks bail.

    1/5

    https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

    2. The case of the prosecution is that on 09.02.2026 at about 5.00 p.m.,

    when the victim girl was at her home, the petitioner trespassed into the house

    and misbehaved with the victim by touching her private parts. Hence, the case.

    3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner

    is innocent and he has been under incarceration since 10.02.2026. He would

    further submit that it was only a dispute between two neighbors and that there

    was no occurrence at all, as stated by the prosecution. He would further submit

    that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be

    imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for the grant of bail.

    4. The learned Government Advocate would oppose the bail application

    and has produced the statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 of

    BNSS, 2023, by the Magistrate on 16.02.2026.

    5. I have given my anxious consideration to the submissions made by the

    learned counsel on either side.

    6. While perusing the statement of the victim recorded under Section 183

    of BNSS, 2023, the victim girl has stated about certain sexual assault made by

    2/5

    https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
    the petitioner. But considering the totality of the circumstances and upon the fact

    that the petitioner has been under incarceration since 10.02.2026, this Court is

    inclined to enlarge him on bail with certain stringent conditions:

    7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his

    executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-Five Thousand

    only), with two sureties each for a like sum, to the satisfaction of the learned

    Sessions Judge, Principal POCSO Court, Salem, subject to the following

    conditions:

    [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left
    Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship
    [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to ‘The Criminal Rules of
    Practice, 2019’]. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy
    of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity;

    [b] the petitioner shall stay at Coimbatore and report
    before the Inspector of Police, Singanallur Police Station
    daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of 45 days;

    [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during
    investigation or trial;

    [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or
    witness either during investigation or trial;

    [e] on breach of any of the aforementioned conditions,
    the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take
    appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with
    law as if the conditions had been imposed and the petitioners
    3/5

    https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
    released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court itself,
    as laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs.
    State of Kerala
    [(2005)13 SCC 283];

    [f] if the petitioner thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR may
    be registered under Section 269 of the Bharatiya Nyaya
    Sanhita, 2023.

    10.04.2026

    ata

    Note:

    1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official
    Website of this Court.

    2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official
    Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To
    be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this
    Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code.

    To

    1. The Sessions Judge, Principal POCSO Court, Salem.

    2. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Salem.

    3. The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Mettur, Salem.

    4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

    4/5

    https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
    C.KUMARAPPAN,J.

    ata

    Crl.O.P.No.9140 of 2026

    10.04.2026

    5/5

    https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here