Jammu & Kashmir High Court – Srinagar Bench
Balbir Singh vs Gurneet Kour on 7 April, 2026
Serial No. 17
Regular Cause List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
CRM(M) 483/2024
CrlM(1110/2024)
Balbir Singh ...Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Syed Wasiq Ahmad, Advocate.
Vs.
Gurneet Kour. ...Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Rizwan Ul Zaman, Advocate.
CORAM:
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal, Judge.
ORDER
07.04.2026
01. The petitioner through the medium of the instant petition
has challenged the order dated 28th May, 2024 passed by the
learned Principal Sessions Judge, Anantnag in a revision titled
“Balbir Singh vs Gurmeet Kour.” The petitioner has also challenged
the order dated 25th July, 2017 passed by the Court of learned
Special Mobile Magistrate, Anantnag in File No. 199/Meem.
02. From a bare perusal of the order passed by the learned
Special Mobile Magistrate, Anantnag, it is apparent that the shop
in question has been ordered to be attached and stock lying
therein worth Rs. 52,000/- has been directed to be sold and the
sale proceeds thereof have been directed to be deposited with the
court below and for compliance of the said order, warrant to
enforce the attachment has been issued and entrusted to the
Station House Officer Police Station, Anantnag for carrying into
effect the said attachment order.
03. The order dated 25th July, 2017 so passed by the learned
Special Mobile Magistrate, Anantnag came to be challenged by the
petitioner by way of a revision before the learned Principal
Sessions Judge, Anantnag, however, the said revision came to be
dismissed by the learned Revisional Court by virtue of a detailed
judgment dated 24th May, 2024 and the order passed by the Court
of learned Special Mobile Magistrate, Anantnag has been upheld.
Being aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Principal
Sessions Judge, Anantnag, the petitioner has preferred the instant
petition. The primary ground which has been raised in the instant
petition is that the order dated 25th July, 2017 passed by the
learned court below would not stand the test of law, more
specifically for the reason that in the basic proceedings filed by the
respondent against the son of the petitioner, the petitioner herein
was not arrayed as a party and the proceedings for grant of
maintenance had been initiated against Gurmeet Singh (son of the
petitioner) in his individual capacity.
04. With a view to clinch the controversy in question, this
Court deems it proper to array “Gurmeet Singh S/o Balbir Singh R/o
Bongund Hatmurrah, Anantnag” as party respondent in the instant
petition, as he was also party before the learned trial court.
Ordered accordingly.
05. Registry to update the cause title and issue notice to
Gurmeet Singh S/o Balbir Singh R/o Bongund Hatmurrah,
Anantnag for his personal appearance in the matter on the next
date of hearing, so that the issue which has been projected in this
petition is resolved once for all.
06. In addition, the petitioner is also directed to take steps for
service of notice upon the newly added respondent.
07. List again on 28th April, 2026.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal)
Judge
SRINAGAR:
07.04.2026
“HAMID”
Abdul Hamid Bhat
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document
08.04.2026
