Become a member

Get the best offers and updates relating to Liberty Case News.

― Advertisement ―

The State Of Andhra Pradesh vs Gollamudi Nagasatyanarayana on 24 February, 2026

Heard Sri G. Naga Satyanarayana, learned counsel for the appellant/A-1, and Sri Neelothpal Ganji, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing...
HomeHigh CourtKarnataka High CourtChandan T J vs The State Of Karnataka on 25 January, 2025

Chandan T J vs The State Of Karnataka on 25 January, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Chandan T J vs The State Of Karnataka on 25 January, 2025

Author: S.R.Krishna Kumar

Bench: S.R.Krishna Kumar

                                                   -1-
                                                                    NC: 2025:KHC:3308
                                                          CRL.P No. 13121 of 2024




                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                                DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025

                                                BEFORE
                               THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
                                   CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 13121 OF 2024


                   BETWEEN:

                   CHANDAN T J,
                   S/O JAYACHANDREGOWDA,
                   AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,
                   R/O THIRUMALAHALLY VILLAGE,
                   MADIHALLY HOBLI, BELUR TALUK,
                   HASSAN DISTRICT, PIN-573 216.
                                                                         ...PETITIONER
                   (BY SRI SUYOG HERELE .E, ADVOCATE)

                   AND:

                   1.     THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
                          THROUGH HALEBEEDU,
                          POLICE STATION, HASSAN DISTRICT,
                          REP. BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
                          HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001.

                   2.     SMT. SHOBHARANI,
Digitally signed          W/O SHIVAKUMARA,
by LEELAVATHI
SR                        AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,
Location: High            R/O THIRUMALAHALLY VILLAGE,
Court of                  MADIHALLY HOBLI, BELUR TALUK,
Karnataka                 HASSAN DISTRICT, PIN-573 216.
                                                                      ...RESPONDENTS
                   (BY SRI VINAY MAHADEVIAH, HCGP FOR R-1)

                         THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.P.C (U/S 528 BNSS) TO SET
                   ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 10.07.2024 PASSED BY THE LEARNED II
                   ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT HASSAN IN SC.NO.108/2023
                   SO FAR AS FRAMING CHARGE NO.4 IS CONCERNED, FOR THE ALLEGED
                   OFFENCES P/U/S 302 R/W 34 OF IPC, AGAINST THE PETITIONER.

                        THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER
                   WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
                                  -2-
                                             NC: 2025:KHC:3308
                                       CRL.P No. 13121 of 2024




CORAM:     HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR


                         ORAL ORDER

In this petition, the petitioner seeks the following

reliefs:

“Set aside the order dated 10.07.2024
passed by the learned II Additional District and
Sessions Judge at Hassan in S.C.No.108/2023
insofar as framing charge no.4 is concerned
for the alleged offences punishable under
Sections 302 r/w 34 IPC against the petitioner
in the ends of justice.”

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

High Court Government Pleader for the respondent-State

and perused the material on record.

3. After arguing the matter for sometime, the

learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner is

arraigned as accused no.1 in S.C.No.108/2023, which is

posted before the learned Sessions Judge on 27.01.2025.
-3-

NC: 2025:KHC:3308
CRL.P No. 13121 of 2024

4. It is submitted that the petitioner shall make an

application under Section 216 Cr.P.C., on 27.01.2025

seeking alteration / modification / amendment of the

charge already framed and before proceeding further, the

trial court may be directed to dispose off the said

application in accordance with law.

5. The submission is placed on record.

6. The petition stands disposed of reserving liberty

to the petitioner to file an application under Section

216 Cr.P.C., before the learned Sessions Court in

S.C.No.108/2023 on 27.01.2025.

7. In the event if the petitioner files such an

application, the trial court shall defer all further

proceedings including recording of evidence and the Trial

Court in the first instance consider and pass appropriate

orders on the said application to be filed by the petitioner

and dispose off the same by passing appropriate orders, in
-4-
NC: 2025:KHC:3308
CRL.P No. 13121 of 2024

accordance with law and thereafter, proceed further in the

matter.

8. Subject to the aforesaid directions and liberty

reserved in favour of the petitioner petition stands

disposed of.

Sd/-

(S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR)
JUDGE

NP
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13



Source link