Tata Capital Limited vs Anjura Bibi And Anr on 6 April, 2026

    0
    52
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Calcutta High Court

    Tata Capital Limited vs Anjura Bibi And Anr on 6 April, 2026

    OC-1
                                   ORDER SHEET
    
                        IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                             COMMERCIAL DIVISION
                                 ORIGINAL SIDE
    
    
                                 AP-COM/23/2026
    
                              TATA CAPITAL LIMITED
                                       VS
                              ANJURA BIBI AND ANR.
    
    
    BEFORE:
    THE HON'BLE JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH
    Date: 6th April, 2026.
                                                                           Appearance:
                                                             Mr. Avishek Guha, Adv.
                                                         Mr. Ankush Majumdar, Adv.
                                                                    Ms. A. Dutta, Adv.
                                                                 . . .for the petitioner.
    
                                                                   Ms. Gargi Roy, Adv.
                                                              Mr. Subrata Saha, Adv.
                                                              Mr. Abhik Biswas, Adv.
                                                               . . .for the respondents

    The Court: The petitioner has filed the present application under

    Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension

    SPONSORED

    of the mandate of the arbitral tribunal for conclusion of the arbitral

    proceedings and publication of the arbitral award.

    Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that this Court vide order

    dated 02.03.2023 set aside the arbitral award passed by the earlier arbitrator

    and with the consent of the parties appointed Mr. Sk. Sariful Haque,

    Advocate as a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.

    The pleadings were completed on 09.07.2024. Thereafter, with the consent of

    the parties the mandate of the arbitral tribunal was extended by six months

    till 08.01.2026.

    2

    Learned Counsel for the petitioner further submits that the matter is

    listed for publication of the award.

    Learned Counsel for the respondents states that he has no objection to

    the extension of the mandate of the arbitral tribunal.

    Upon consideration of the submissions of the parties and the materials

    placed on record, this Court is satisfied that there has been no undue and

    unwarranted delay on the part of the learned sole arbitrator in conducting

    the proceedings.

    Having regard to the advanced stage of the proceedings and in the

    interest of justice, the mandate of the arbitral tribunal is extended further for

    a period of two months from today to enable the arbitrator to publish the

    award.

    The learned sole arbitrator is requested to make all reasonable

    endeavours to publish the arbitral award within the extended time period.

    With the aforesaid observations, the present application stands

    disposed of.

    (GAURANG KANTH, J.)

    S. A.
    AR (CR)

    [ad_1]

    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here