Nirmaljit Singh @ Nimma vs State Of Punjab on 2 April, 2026

    0
    42
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Supreme Court – Daily Orders

    Nirmaljit Singh @ Nimma vs State Of Punjab on 2 April, 2026

    Author: Sanjay Karol

    Bench: Sanjay Karol

                                        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
                                       CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
    
                                  CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.           OF 2026
                                (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) NO.3853/2026)
    
    
                          NIRMALJIT SINGH @ NIMMA                      APPELLANT(S)
    
                                                            VERSUS
    
                          STATE OF PUNJAB                              RESPONDENT(S)
    
                                                      O R D E R
    

    1. Leave granted.

    2. The appellant challenges the judgment and

    SPONSORED

    order dated 23.02.2026 in CRM-M No.21790/2024

    titled “Nirmaljit Singh @ Nimma vs. State of

    Punjab” passed by the High Court of Punjab and

    Haryana at Chandigarh.

    3. The appellant was in custody in connection

    with FIR No.77/2017 dated 07.09.2017, registered

    at P.S. Banur, District-Patiala for the offences

    punishable under Sections 302, 148, 149, 473,

    201 & 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
    Signature Not Verified

    Digitally signed by
    Considering the medical condition of the
    RAJNI MUKHI
    Date: 2026.04.07
    17:03:44 IST
    Reason:
    SLP (Crl.) NO.3853/2026 1
    appellant, he was enlarged on interim bail vide

    order dated 07.11.2024 in CRM-M No.21790/2024

    (fifth petition for regular bail) by the High

    Court. Subsequently, the bail granted was

    extended. Later, considering the report filed

    along with the affidavit dated 28.10.2025, the

    High Court dismissed the said petition on merits

    and directed the appellant to surrender within a

    period of one (01) week from today. Challenging

    the same, the present appeal is filed.

    4. This Court, vide order dated 27.02.2026,

    protected the appellant against surrender until

    further orders.

    5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties

    and perused the material placed on record, we

    are of the considered view that the appellant

    has made out a case for interference with the

    impugned order dated 23.02.2026.

    6. Considering the totality of circumstances,

    SLP (Crl.) NO.3853/2026 2
    we are inclined to grant bail to the appellant

    on such terms and conditions as may be fixed by

    the Trial Court. Ordered accordingly.

    7. Since the appellant has not surrendered, we

    direct the appellant to appear before the Trial

    Court on 10.04.2026 to furnish fresh bail bonds.

    8. Trial expedited. The appellant shall fully

    cooperate during the trial and shall not misuse

    the liberty in any manner. It shall be open to

    the Trial Court to take all steps, including

    cancellation of bail, should the necessity

    arise.

    9. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed.

    10. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand

    disposed of.

    ………………………J.
    (SANJAY KAROL)

    ………………………J.
    (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH)

    NEW DELHI;

    2nd APRIL, 2026
    
    SLP (Crl.) NO.3853/2026                          3
    ITEM NO.17          COURT NO.11           SECTION II-B
    
                    S U P R E M E C O U R T O F     I N D I A
                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
    
    

    Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)No.3853/2026
    [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated
    23-02-2026 in CRMM No. 21790/2024 passed by the High
    Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh]

    NIRMALJIT SINGH @ NIMMA PETITIONER(S)

    VERSUS

    STATE OF PUNJAB RESPONDENT(S)

    (FOR ADMISSION, I.R., IA No. 66916/2026 – EXEMPTION FROM
    FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND I.A. NO.
    98623/2026-APPLICATION FOR IMPLEADMENT)

    Date : 02-04-2026 This matter was called on for hearing
    today.

    CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KAROL
    HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH

    For Petitioner(s) :Mr. Ajay Pal, AOR
    Ms. Sugandh Rathor, Adv.

    Mr. Mayank Dahiya, Adv.

    Ms. Bhupinder, Adv.

    For Respondent(s) :Mr. Siddhant Sharma,AOR
    Mr. Vikram Choudhary, Adv.

    Mr. Mahir Sood, Adv.

    Mr. Arun William, Adv.

    Mr. Harleen Singh, Adv.

    Mr. Shikhar Narwal, Adv.

    Mr. Nisarg P. Khatri, Adv.

    Mr. Arunava Mukherjee, AOR

    UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
    O R D E R

    1. Application for impleadment is allowed.

    SLP (Crl.) NO.3853/2026 4

    2. Leave granted.

    3. Bail is granted to the appellant on such terms and

    conditions as may be fixed by the Trial Court. The

    appellant is directed to appear before the Trial Court

    on 10.04.2026 to furnish fresh bail bonds.

    4. The appeal is allowed in terms of signed order.

    5. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand

    disposed of.

    (RAJNI MUKHI)                           (ANU BHALLA)
    ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS                COURT MASTER (NSH)
    
    
    
    
    SLP (Crl.) NO.3853/2026                       5
    

    [ad_1]

    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here