has supported the findings arrived at by the learned Single Judge.
He submits that the Hon’ble Supreme Court in a similar case of
State of West Bengal Vs. Baishakhi Bhattacharya
(Chatterjee) and Ors. (supra) has submitted that while
untainted appointments are required to be protected and their
invalidation would lead to heartburn and anguish, but the purity of
selection process is paramount and has to be given highest
priority.
75. He submits that the factual finding arrived at by the learned
Single Judge who has gone into the details relating to involvement
of the two RPSC Members, one of whom was already found to be
involved in selling paper of another competitive examination
conducted by the RPSC, but was still allowed to be part of the
interview process is sufficient to hold that there has been a
systemic failure in maintaining the purity of the examination and
therefore, the entire examination deserves to be quashed.
