Shri. Michael Marak vs . State Of Meghalaya & Anr. on 7 April, 2026

    0
    39
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Meghalaya High Court

    Shri. Michael Marak vs . State Of Meghalaya & Anr. on 7 April, 2026

    Author: W. Diengdoh

    Bench: W. Diengdoh

      Serial No. 02
      Regular List
    
    
    
                            HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
                                AT SHILLONG
    
    Crl.A. No. 25 of 2026
                                                        Date of Order: 07.04.2026
    Shri. Michael Marak               Vs.         State of Meghalaya & Anr.
    Coram:
                  Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge
    
    Appearance:
    For the Petitioner/Appellant(s)   :     Mr. K.C. Gautam, Adv. with
                                            Ms. B. Syiem, Adv.
                                            Mr. M. Halder, Adv.
    For the Respondent(s)                   Mr. H. Kharmih, Addl. PP.

    Mr. S. Sengupta, Addl. PP.

    Heard K.C. Gautam, learned counsel for the appellant, who has
    submitted that the appellant, being aggrieved and dissatisfied by the impugned
    judgment dated 27.02.2026 and order of sentence dated 02.03.2026 passed by
    the Court of the learned Additional Deputy Commissioner (Judicial), East
    Khasi Hills District, Shillong in Sessions Case No. 20 (T) 2014, whereby, the
    appellant was directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of
    3(three) years with fine of ₹ 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) only, and in
    default thereof, to undergo further simple imprisonment of 2(two) months for
    the offence punishable under Section 304 para II IPC, has now approached
    this Court with this instant appeal with a prayer for quashing and setting aside
    the said impugned judgment and related sentence.

    SPONSORED

    1

    The learned counsel has also read through the facts and
    circumstances of the case, and has submitted that there are good grounds for
    this appeal to be admitted and to be finally heard on merits. As such, prayer is
    made for admission of this appeal.

    Mr. H. Kharmih, learned Addl. PP appearing on behalf of the State
    respondent has no objection to the admission of this appeal.

    On consideration of the submission made, this Court is convinced
    that the appeal is required to be heard on merits, the same is accordingly
    admitted.

    The Trial Court records are hereby called for, on receipt of the said
    records, appellant is directed to prepare the paper book.

    List this matter after 3(three) weeks.

    Judge
    Meghalaya
    07.04.2026
    “D. Nary, PS”

    2



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here