Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur
Joga Ram vs State Of Rajasthan on 6 April, 2026
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2805/2026
Joga Ram S/o Bharu Ram, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Godaron Ka
Tala, Leelsar, P.s. Chouhatan, District Barmer. (At Present Lodged
Dist. Jail Barmer)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.J. Poonia
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Hanuman Prajapati, PP with
Mr. Ravindra Singh Bhati
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Order
06/04/2026
1. The present bail application has been preferred under
Section 483 B.N.S.S., 2023, on behalf of the petitioner. The
requisite details of the matter are tabulated herein below:
S.No. Particulars of the Case 1. FIR Number 149/2021 2. Concerned Police Station Chouhatan 3. District Barmer 4. Offences alleged in the FIR Under Sections 143, 323, 341, 447, 427, 382, 458 of IPC, 1860 5. Offence(s) added, if any, Under Sections 147, 148, 149, 354, 395 of IPC, 1860
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner
has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that
(Uploaded on 06/04/2026 at 05:42:40 PM)
(Downloaded on 06/04/2026 at 08:48:50 PM)
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-2805/2026]
the police have not made out a case against the petitioner in the
charge-sheet, which was filed against other accused persons. He
also submits that the FIR is a result of a sudden quarrel over
boundary dispute and there was no intention to commit any
offence. He further submitted that the other co-accused have
already been enlarged on bail by Co-ordinate Benches of this
Court vide order dated 14.07.2021 in S.B. CRLMB No. 8960/2021
(Jasu Ram) and order dated 29.06.2021 in S.B. CRLMB No.
8285/2021 (Jassa Ram), and the case of the petitioner stands on
better footing to enlarge on bail. He also submits that the
petitioner is in judicial custody since 19.02.2026 and the trial of
the case will take long time to conclude, therefore, the bail
application of the petitioner may kindly be allowed.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor and the counsel for the
complainant vehemently opposed the bail application and the
benefit of bail should not be granted to the petitioner.
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
material available on record.
5. Considering the facts of the case, more particularly that the
that the FIR is a result of a sudden quarrel over boundary dispute
and there was no intention to commit any offence; that the other
co-accused have already been enlarged on bail by Co-ordinate
Benches of this Court vide order dated 14.07.2021 in S.B. CRLMB
No. 8960/2021 (Jasu Ram) and order dated 29.06.2021 in S.B.
CRLMB No. 8285/2021 (Jassa Ram), and the case of the petitioner
stands on better footing; the petitioner is in judicial custody since
19.02.2026 and there is high probability that the trial of the case
(Uploaded on 06/04/2026 at 05:42:40 PM)
(Downloaded on 06/04/2026 at 08:48:50 PM)
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-2805/2026]
will take considerable time to conclude, therefore, I deem it
appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the present matter.
6. Considering the total facts and circumstances of the case. I
deem it appropriate to enlarge the petitioner in the present
matter.
7. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Section 483
B.N.S.S., 2023 is allowed and it is ordered that the accused- Joga
Ram S/o Bharu Ram, shall be enlarged on bail provided he
furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two
sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial
Court for his appearance before the court concerned on all the
dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
8. The petitioner shall also not tamper with any evidence nor
would he directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or
promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as
to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any
police officer.
9. It is made it clear that the observations made hereinabove
are only for deciding the present bail application without
commenting on the merits/de-merits of the case, and shall not
influence the trial of the case in any manner.
(MANEESH SHARMA),J
29-simran/-
(Uploaded on 06/04/2026 at 05:42:40 PM)
(Downloaded on 06/04/2026 at 08:48:50 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
