Nusrat Bibi & Anr vs Union Territory Of J&K And Others on 3 April, 2026

    0
    32
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Jammu & Kashmir High Court – Srinagar Bench

    Nusrat Bibi & Anr vs Union Territory Of J&K And Others on 3 April, 2026

                                                                 Sr. no. 172
                                                                     supple
    
          HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
                         AT SRINAGAR
    
    
                                   WP(C) 662/2026
    
    Nusrat Bibi & Anr.                                                    ...Petitioner(s)
               Through:               Mr. Usman Gani Lone, Adv. with
                                      Mr. Amir Ishtiyaq Malik, Advocate
    
    VS.
    Union Territory of J&K and Others.                              ...Respondent(s)
               Through:
    
    CORAM:
               Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd. Yousuf Wani, Judge.
                                          ORDER
    

    03.04.2026

    01. Petitioners are present in person.

    SPONSORED

    02. Through the medium of the instant petition, filed under Article 226
    of the Constitution of India, the petitioners seek issuance of
    writs/directions in the nature of:

    (i) “Mandamus for commanding upon the official
    respondents 1 to 4 to provide them the necessary
    protection as they are apprehending threat to their
    lives at the hands of private respondent 5 for
    contracting marriage out of their own free will and
    choice;

    (ii) Prohibition for restraining official respondents 1 to
    4 to make unnecessary arrest of the petitioner No.2
    being the husband of the petitioner No.1 and for
    restraining all the respondents from interfering into
    their matrimonial life.”

    03. It is the case of the petitioners that they being major have
    solemnized marriage out of their own free will and choice in
    accordance with the Muslim Personal Law guaranteeing them on
    20.03.2026. That they have placed on record photocopy of
    “Nikah Nama” forming annexure-I to their petition. That the
    father i.e., respondent No. 5 of petitioner No.1 wanted to get the
    petitioner No.1 married somewhere else without her consent.
    That the petitioners also apprehend the private respondent No. 5
    may lodge a false and frivolous complaint before the police
    concerned to get an FIR registered against the petitioner No.2.

    04. The petitioners who are present in person and whose
    identification was checked, corroborated the contents of their
    petition. Their statements were got recorded by the Learned
    Registrar Judicial of this court in attestation of this petition.

    05. The petitioners have placed on record the scanned copies of
    their Adhaar Cards, Date of Birth Certificates as also of the
    alleged “Nikah Nama”. Perusal of the copies of the Date of Birth
    Certificates reveals the Date of Birth of the petitioner No.1 Nusrat
    Bibi as 13/10/2004, while as that of petitioner No.2 Saif Ali is
    14/01/2004.

    06. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that
    since the petitioners being major have contracted marriage out of
    their own free will and choice, as such the instant writ petition be
    disposed of at this thresh-hold stage in view of the law laid down
    by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in case “Lata Singh vs.
    State of UP and ors
    (2006) 5 SCC 475″;and “Arumugam Servia
    v. State of Tamil Nadu (2011) 6 SCC 405” decided on 19th April
    2011, by passing the appropriate directions upon the respondents
    to safe guard the life and liberty of the petitioners, to prevent any
    sort of undue harassment to them, and also interference with their
    matrimonial life.

    07. In the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is of the
    opinion that the instant matter can be disposed of at this threshold
    stage by passing of appropriate orders in accordance with the law.

    08. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of at this thresh
    hold stage with the following directions:

    i) The official respondents 1 to 4 shall ensure that no
    unjustified harassment is being caused to the petitioners
    and they shall be provided the protection as and when
    asked for the same;

    ii) The private respondent No. 5 shall also desist from
    causing any illegal and unjustified harassment to the
    petitioners, so that their right to life and personal liberty
    is not interfered with.

    ,

    09. However, in view of the ratio decidendi of the law laid down
    by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Doly Rani vs. Manish
    Kumar Chanchal
    [ 2024 Live Law (SC) 334 =2024 SCC Online
    SC 754] decided on 19.04.2024, this order shall not be construed as
    any opinion of this Court regarding the validity of marriage as per
    Personal Law guaranteeing the parties.

    10. Disposed of along with connected CM.

    (Mohd. Yousuf Wani)
    Judge
    SRINAGAR:

    03.04.26
    “Ayaz”



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here